The Effect of Caudal Ropivacaine and Morphine on Postoperative Analgesia in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

References

• Farquhar CM, Steiner CA. Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990–1997. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(2):229–234. doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01723-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laberge PY, Singh SS. Surgical approach to hysterectomy: introducing the concept of technicity. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009;31(11):1050–1053. doi:10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34350-X
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, et al. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures. BJOG. 2009;116(4):492–500. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01966.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luchristt D, Brown O, Kenton K, et al. Trends in operative time and outcomes in minimally invasive hysterectomy from 2008 to 2018. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(2):202.e1–202.e12. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang CC, Lo TS, Huang YT, et al. Surgical trends and time frame comparison of surgical types of hysterectomy: a nationwide, population-based 15-year study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(1):65–73.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoller N, Wertli MM, Zaugg TM, et al. Regional variation of hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases in Switzerland. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233082. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Oh SR, Cho YJ, et al. Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Women Health. 2019;19(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s12905-019-0784-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghezzi F, Uccella S, Cromi A, et al. Postoperative pain after laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(2):118.e1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, et al. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiol. 2013;118(4):934–944. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Hao LJ, Hou XL, et al. Preoperative anxiety and postoperative pain in patients with laparoscopic hysterectomy. Front Psych. 2021;12:727250. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JB, Kang K, Song MK, et al. Pain characteristics after total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Med Sci. 2016;13(8):562–568. doi:10.7150/ijms.15875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lirk P, Thiry J, Bonnet MP, et al. PROSPECT Working Group. Pain management after laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of literature and PROSPECT recommendations. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44(4):425–436. doi:10.1136/rapm-2018-100024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen C, Dam M, Nielsen MV, et al. Transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46(1):25–30. doi:10.1136/rapm-2020-101931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netter FH. Section 6 pelvis and perineum. In: Machado CAG, Hansen JT, Benninger B, Brueckner-Collins J, Hoagland TM, Tubbs RS, editors. Atlas of Human Anatomy. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018:397.
   Google Scholar
• Apan A, Cuvas O. Caudal block in adults: new horizons with ultrasound. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79(12):1332–1333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao SC, Lin CS. Caudal epidural block: an updated review of anatomy and techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9217145. doi:10.1155/2017/9217145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecoffey C, Lacroix F, Giaufré E, et al. Association des Anesthésistes Réanimateurs Pédiatriques d’Expression Française (ADARPEF). Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: a follow-up one-year prospective survey of the French-Language Society of Paediatric Anaesthesiologists (ADARPEF). Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20(12):1061–1069. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03448.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nestor CC, Ng C, Sepulveda P, et al. Pharmacological and clinical implications of local anaesthetic mixtures: a narrative review. Anaesth. 2022;77(3):339–350. doi:10.1111/anae.15641
   Google Scholar
• Boezaart AP, Smith CR, Chembrovich S, et al. Visceral versus somatic pain: an educational review of anatomy and clinical implications. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46(7):629–636. doi:10.1136/rapm-2020-102084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gali B, Whalen FX, Schroeder DR, et al. Identification of patients at risk for postoperative respiratory complications using a preoperative obstructive sleep apnea screening tool and postanesthesia care assessment. Anesthesiol. 2009;110(4):869–877. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819b5d70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tas B, Kalk NJ, Lozano-García M, et al. Undetected respiratory depression in people with opioid use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022;234:109401. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark NV, Moore K, Maghsoudlou P, et al. Superior hypogastric plexus block to reduce pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(4):648–656. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy DT, Kavanagh EC, Poynton A, et al. MR epidurography: distribution of injectate at caudal epidural injection. Skelet Radiol. 2015;44(4):565–571. doi:10.1007/s00256-014-1963-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, et al. Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(3):424–429. doi:10.1093/bja/aew466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato M, Iida T, Kikuchi C, et al. Comparison of caudal ropivacaine-morphine and paravertebral catheter for major upper abdominal surgery in infants. Paediatr Anaesth. 2017;27(5):524–530. doi:10.1111/pan.13104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato M, Bosenberg A. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block compared to caudal ropivacaine/morphine in children undergoing surgery for vesicoureteric reflex. Paediatr Anaesth. 2019;29(7):738–743. doi:10.1111/pan.13650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh S, Ecoffey C, Bosenberg A, et al. The European society of regional anaesthesia and pain therapy/American society of regional anesthesia and pain medicine recommendations on local anesthetics and adjuvants dosage in pediatric regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(2):211–216. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer C, Blanié P, Jaouën E, et al. Ropivacaine, 0.1%, plus sufentanil, 0.5 microg/mL, versus bupivacaine, 0.1%, plus sufentanil, 0.5 microg/mL, using patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor: a double-blind comparison. Anesthesiol. 2000;92(6):1588–1593. doi:10.1097/00000542-200006000-00015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson PS, Liu SS. A comparison of ropivacaine with fentanyl to bupivacaine with fentanyl for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2001;92(4):1024–1028. doi:10.1097/00000539-200104000-00041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roofthooft E, Joshi GP, Rawal N, et al. PROSPECT working group* of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and pain therapy and supported by the Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association. PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anesth. 2021;76:665–680. doi:10.1111/anae.15339
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen H, Wetterslev J, Møiniche S, et al. Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV, and pain after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;4:CD001893. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001893
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lanz E, Kehrberger E, Theiss D. Epidural morphine: a clinical double-blind study of dosage. Anesth Analg. 1985;64:786–791. doi:10.1213/00000539-198508000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuchiya M, Kyoh Y, Mizutani K, et al. Ultrasound-guided single shot caudal block anesthesia reduces postoperative urinary catheter-induced discomfort. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79(12):1381–1388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacassie HJ, Columb MO, Lacassie HP, et al. The relative motor blocking potencies of epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine in labor. Anesth Analg. 2002;95(1):204–208. doi:10.1097/00000539-200207000-00036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamber EA, Viscomi CM. Intrathecal lipophilic opioids as adjuncts to surgical spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24(3):255–263. doi:10.1097/00115550-199924030-00015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham AC, McClure JH. Quantitative assessment of motor block in labouring women receiving epidural analgesia. Anesth. 2001;56(5):470–476. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01524-6.x
   Google Scholar