Intraocular Implantable Collamer Lens with a Central Hole Implantation: Safety, Efficacy, and Patient Outcomes

References

• Lovisolo CF, Reinstein DZ. Phakic intraocular lenses. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50(6):549–587. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Wang Z, Zhang D, et al. Visual outcomes and corneal biomechanics after V4c implantable collamer lens implantation in subclinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(10):1339–1345. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güell JL, Morral M, Kook D, Kohnen T. Phakic intraocular lenses part 1: historical overview, current models, selection criteria, and surgical techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(11):1976–1993. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders DR, Doney K, Poco M. ICL in treatment of myopia study group. united states food and drug administration clinical trial of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) for moderate to high myopia: three-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1683–1692. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders DR, Schneider D, Martin R, et al. Toric implantable collamer lens for moderate to high myopic astigmatism. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(1):54–61. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen E, Gore C. Staar Collamer posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens to correct myopia and hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24(5):596–606. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80253-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assetto V, Benedetti S, Pesando P. Collamer intraocular contact lens to correct high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22(5):551–556. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80007-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison JA. Positive and negative dysphotopsia in patients with acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(9):1346–1355. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00611-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cambrodí RJ, Piñero DP, Ferrer-Blasco T, Cerviño A, Brautaset R. The posterior chamber phakic refractive lens (PRL): a review. Eye. 2013;27(1):14–21. doi:10.1038/eye.2012.235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Care Group. IPCL V2.0. Available from: http://caregroupiol.com/products/phakic-lenses/ipcl/. Accessed February 16, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Biotech. Eyecryl Phakic. Available from: https://biotechhealthcare.com/ophthalmology/refractive-product-range/eyecryl-phakic/. Accessed February 16, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Schallhorn S, Tanzer D, Sanders DR, Sanders ML. Randomized prospective comparison of visian toric implantable collamer lens and conventional photorefractive keratectomy for moderate to high myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg Thorofare NJ. 2007;23(9):853–867. doi:10.3928/1081-597X-20071101-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goes S, Delbeke H. Posterior chamber toric implantable collamer lenses vs LASIK for myopia and astigmatism: systematic review. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(10):1204–1210. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Wang H, Luo DQ, Chen J. Optical and visual quality comparison of implantable collamer lens and femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia correction. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(5):737–743. doi:10.18240/ijo.2021.05.15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HT, Zhou Z, Luo WQ, et al. Comparison of optical quality after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(4):656–661. doi:10.18240/ijo.2018.04.20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Guo L, Han T, Wu L, Wang X, Zhou X. Contralateral eye comparison of the long‐term visual quality and stability between implantable collamer lens and laser refractive surgery for myopia. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(3):e471–e478. doi:10.1111/aos.13846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh S, Brar S, Pawar A. Matched population comparison of visual outcomes and patient satisfaction between 3 modalities for the correction of low to moderate myopic astigmatism. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1253–1263. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S127101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siedlecki J, Schmelter V, Mayer WJ, et al. SMILE versus implantable collamer lens implantation for high myopia: a matched comparative study. J Refract Surg. 2020;36(3):150–159. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20200210-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Zhao J, Han T, et al. Investigation of contrast sensitivity and disk halo in high myopia treated with SMILE and EVO implantable collamer lens implantation. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022;11(4):23. doi:10.1167/tvst.11.4.23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuck RS, Jacobs DS, Lee JK, et al. Refractive errors & refractive surgery preferred practice pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(1):P1–P104. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German Society of Ophthalmology (Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft DOG), Professional Association of German Ophthalmologists (Berufsverband der Augenärzte Deutschlands e. V., BVA). Evaluation and quality assurance of refractive surgery by the German Society of Ophthalmology and the Professional Association of German Ophthalmologists-Commission for refractive surgery recommendations. Ophthalmol Z Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges. 2020;117(Suppl1):25–35. doi:10.1007/s00347-019-00986-6
   Google Scholar
• Alhamzah A, Alharbi SS, Alfardan F, Aldebasi T, Almudhaiyan T. Indications for exchange or explantation of phakic implantable collamer lens with central port in patients with and without keratoconus. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(11):1714–1720. doi:10.18240/ijo.2021.11.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders DR. Anterior subcapsular opacities and cataracts 5 years after surgery in the visian implantable collamer lens FDA trial. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiratani T, Shimizu K, Fujisawa K, Uga S, Nagano K, Murakami Y. Crystalline lens changes in porcine eyes with implanted phakic IOL (ICL) with a central hole. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(5):719–728. doi:10.1007/s00417-007-0759-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamorita T, Uozato H, Shimizu K. Fluid dynamics simulation of aqueous humour in a posterior-chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central perforation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250(6):935–939. doi:10.1007/s00417-011-1850-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamorita T, Shimizu K, Shoji N. Effect of hole size on fluid dynamics of a posterior-chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central perforation by using computational fluid dynamics. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(4):739–744. doi:10.1007/s00417-016-3304-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujisawa K, Shimizu K, Uga S, et al. Changes in the crystalline lens resulting from insertion of a phakic IOL (ICL) into the porcine eye. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;245(1):114–122. doi:10.1007/s00417-006-0338-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Vives C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D, García-Lázaro S, Montés-Micó R. Optical quality comparison of conventional and hole-visian implantable collamer lens at different degrees of decentering. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(1):69–76.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Vives C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D, García-Lázaro S, Montés-Micó R. Visual quality comparison of conventional and Hole-Visian implantable collamer lens at different degrees of decentering. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(1):59–64. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shiratani T. Intraindividual comparison of visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole implantation for moderate to high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154(3):486–494.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Kobashi H. Long-term comparison of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) implantation for moderate to high myopia and myopic astigmatism: consort-compliant article. Medicine. 2016;95(14):e3270. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000003270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packer M. Evaluation of the EVO/EVO+ sphere and toric visian ICL: six month results from the United States food and drug administration clinical trial. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:1541–1553. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S369467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EVO/EVO+ VISIAN implantable collamer lens – P030016/S035. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/recently-approved-devices/evoevo-visian-implantable-collamer-lens-p030016s035. Accessed September 23, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• STAAR Surgical Company. Approved expanded uses for EVO visian ICLTM and changes to DFU; 2018. Available from: https://www.facoelche.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ICL-Age-Range-and-ACD-Expansion-Announcement-2018_Final-II.pdf. Accessed February 13, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, et al. Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in eyes with an anterior chamber depth of less than 3 mm: a multicenter study. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13322. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31782-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, et al. A nationwide multicenter study on 1-year outcomes of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for low myopia. Front Med. 2022;9:762153. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.762153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto C, Monteiro T, Franqueira N, Faria-Correia F, Mendes J, Vaz F. Posterior chamber collamer phakic intraocular lens implantation: comparison of efficacy and safety for low and moderate-to-high myopia. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022;32(2):894–901. doi:10.1177/11206721211012861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, et al. Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation: comparative, multicentre study in 351 eyes with low-to-moderate or high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(2):177–181. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shiratani T. Early clinical outcomes of implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central hole (Hole ICL) for moderate to high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(3):409–412. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega-Cueto L, Alfonso-Bartolozzi B, Montés-Micó R, Fernández-Vega L. Five-year follow-up of correction of myopia: posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central port design. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(3):169–176. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190118-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Vega-Cueto L, Alfonso-Bartolozzi B, Lisa C, Madrid-Costa D, Alfonso JF. Seven-year follow-up of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with central port design. Eye Vis. 2021;8(1):23. doi:10.1186/s40662-021-00247-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei R, Li M, Niu L, et al. Comparison of visual outcomes after non‐toric and toric implantable collamer lens V4c for myopia and astigmatism. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(5):511–518. doi:10.1111/aos.14652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshirfar M, Bundogji N, Tukan AN, et al. Toric implantable collamer lens for the treatment of myopic astigmatism. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:2893–2906. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S321095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano-Ortiz A, Sánchez-Ventosa Á, Membrillo A, et al. Astigmatism correction with toric implantable collamer lens in low and high astigmatism groups. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022;32(1):183–192. doi:10.1177/1120672121999991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Zhao J, Yang W, et al. Influence of ocular residual astigmatism and target-induced astigmatism on the efficacy of the implantation of a toric implantable collamer lens with central hole for myopic astigmatism correction. Front Med. 2022;8:737358. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.737358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packer M. The Implantable Collamer Lens with a central port: review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:2427–2438. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S188785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu L, Miao H, Tian M, Fu D, Wang X, Zhou X. One‐year visual outcomes and optical quality of femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction and Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL V4c) implantation for high myopia. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98:6. doi:10.1111/aos.14344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aruma A, Li M, Choi J, et al. Visual outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction and implantable collamer lens V4c for moderate myopia: 1-year results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259(8):2431–2440. doi:10.1007/s00417-020-04982-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Juárez E, Velázquez-Villoria D. Low diopter phakic implantable collamer lens: refractive and visual outcomes in low myopia and myopic astigmatism. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:2969–2977. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S373378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Wang X, Xu Y, et al. Five-year outcomes of EVO implantable collamer lens implantation for the correction of high myopia and super high myopia. Eye Vis. 2021;8(1):40. doi:10.1186/s40662-021-00264-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Takahashi M, Ando W, Hayakawa H, Shoji N. Eight-year outcomes of implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central port for moderate to high ametropia. Front Med. 2021;8:799078. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.799078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papa-Vettorazzi MR, Güell JL, Cruz-Rodriguez JB, Moura-Coelho N, Elies D. Long-term efficacy and safety profiles after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in eyes with more than 10 years of follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(7):813–818. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Chen Z, Miao H, Wang X, Wang X, Zhou X. One-year analysis of the refractive stability, axial elongation and related factors in a high myopia population after Implantable Collamer Lens implantation. Int Ophthalmol. 2022;42(11):3295–3302. doi:10.1007/s10792-022-02328-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohac M, Biscevic A, Gabric I, Gabric K, Shijakova V, Patel S. A critical evaluation of longitudinal changes of astigmatism following implantation of toric implantable collamer lens (TICL): a comparison between treated and untreated cases over 4 years. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260(4):1377–1386. doi:10.1007/s00417-021-05449-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K, Hu Z, Zhou J, et al. Vector Analysis of the Effects of FS-LASIK and Toric ICL for Moderate to High Astigmatism Correction. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:1–6. doi:10.1155/2018/6952710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei R, Li M, Zhang H, et al. Comparison of objective and subjective visual quality early after implantable collamer lens V4c (ICL V4c) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia correction. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98(8). doi:10.1111/aos.14459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packer M. Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;1059. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S111620
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kato S, Shimizu K, Igarashi A. Assessment of low-vault cases with an implantable collamer lens. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0241814. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Lisa C, Fernandes P, González-Meijome J, Montés-Micó R. Long-term evaluation of the central vault after phakic Collamer® lens (ICL) implantation using OCT. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250(12):1807–1812. doi:10.1007/s00417-012-1957-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi KH, Chung SE, Chung TY, Chung ES. Ultrasound biomicroscopy for determining visian implantable contact lens length in phakic IOL implantation. J Refract Surg Thorofare NJ. 2007;23(4):362–367. doi:10.3928/1081-597X-20070401-08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Lopez F, Bouza-Miguens C, Tejerina V, Mompean B, Ortega-Usobiaga J, Bilbao-Calabuig R. Long-term assessment of crystalline lens transparency in eyes implanted with a central-hole phakic collamer lens developing low postoperative vault. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(2):204–210. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Lopez F, Bouza-Miguens C, Tejerina V, et al. Dynamic assessment of variations in pupil diameter using swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography after phakic collamer lens implantation. Eye Vis. 2021;8(1):39. doi:10.1186/s40662-021-00262-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gonzalez-Lopez F, Bilbao-Calabuig R, Mompean B, Luezas J, Ortega-Usobiaga J, Druchkiv V. Determining the potential role of crystalline lens rise in vaulting in posterior chamber phakic collamer lens surgery for correction of myopia. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(3):177–183. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190204-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthil S, Choudhari NS, Vaddavalli PK, Murthy S, Reddy J, Garudadri CS. Etiology and management of raised intraocular pressure following posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in myopic eyes. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0165469. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanbour W, Cherfan C, Jarade E, Khoury J. Unilateral malignant glaucoma postbilateral implantable collamer lens: effect of miotics. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2019;26(3):181. doi:10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_197_18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover IG, Senthil S, Murthy S, Reddy JC. A rare case of pupillary block glaucoma following centraflow implantable collamer lens surgery. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(8):694–696. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niruthisard D, Kasetsuwan N. UnilateralUrrets-Zavalia syndrome after implantable collamer lens implantation: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Reports. 2021;15(1):467. doi:10.1186/s13256-021-03063-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu Z, Chen C, Sun M, Yuan R, Ye J. The relationship between anterior chamber angle and intraocular pressure early after V4c implantable collamer lens implantation. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:1–6. doi:10.1155/2020/4014512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packer KT, Vlasov A, Greenburg DL, et al. U.S. military implantable collamer lens surgical outcomes: 11-year retrospective review. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(6):649–656. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goukon H, Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell density and morphology after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation with and without a central hole. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(11):1461–1465. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisa C, Naveiras M, Alfonso-Bartolozzi B, Belda-Salmerón L, Montés-Micó R, Alfonso JF. Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole to correct myopia: one-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(6):1153–1159. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.10.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Wang X, Xu Y, et al. Long-term comparison of vault and complications of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole for high myopia correction: 5 years. Curr Eye Res. 2022;47(4):540–546. doi:10.1080/02713683.2021.2012202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Zhao J, Sun L, et al. Four-year observation of the changes in corneal endothelium cell density and correlated factors after Implantable Collamer Lens V4c implantation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105(5):625–630. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohac M, Jagic M, Biscevic A, Shijakova V, Gabric N, Patel S. Changes in endothelial cell count up to three years after implantation of toric implantable collamer lenses. Cornea. 2019;38(7):873–879. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Shen Y, Xu H, Wang X, Zhou X. One-year natural course of corneal densitometry in high myopic patients after implantation of an implantable collamer lens (model V4c). BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):50. doi:10.1186/s12886-020-1320-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Luo D, Sun Y, et al. Implanting a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens in highly myopic eyes with peripheral primary iris and ciliary body cysts. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019;29(2):171–177. doi:10.1177/1120672118766445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Vega-Cueto L, Lisa C, Esteve-Taboada JJ, Montés-Micó R, Alfonso J. Implantable collamer lens with central hole: 3-year follow-up. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:2015–2029. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S171576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan Z, Miao H, Zhao F, et al. Two-year outcomes of visian implantable collamer lens with a central hole for correcting high myopia. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:1–9. doi:10.1155/2018/8678352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayakawa H, Kamiya K, Ando W, Takahashi M, Shoji N. Etiology and outcomes of current posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens extraction. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):21686. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-78661-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moya T, Javaloy J, Montés-Micó R, Beltrán J, Muñoz G, Montalbán R. Implantable collamer lens for myopia: assessment 12 years after implantation. J Refract Surg. 2015;31(8):548–556. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20150727-05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igarashi A, Kamiya K, Ichikawa K, et al. Multicenter clinical outcomes of hole implantable collamer lens implantation in middle-aged patients. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):4236. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08298-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimbel HV, LeClair BM, Jabo B, Marzouk H. Incidence of implantable Collamer lens–induced cataract. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018;53(5):518–522. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.11.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonvers M, Bornet C, Othenin-Girard P. Implantable contact lens for moderate to high myopia: relationship of vaulting to cataract formation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(5):918–924. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00065-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Li J, Song H. Short-time evaluation on intraocular scattering after implantable collamer lens implantation for correcting high myopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):235. doi:10.1186/s12886-020-01482-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He T, Zhu Y, Zhou J. Optical quality after posterior chamber Phakic implantation of an intraocular Lens with a central hole (V4c implantable Collamer Lens) under different lighting conditions. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):82. doi:10.1186/s12886-020-01340-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao H, Chen X, Tian M, Chen Y, Wang X, Zhou X. Refractive outcomes and optical quality after implantation of posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lens with a central hole (ICL V4c). BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(4):141. doi:10.1186/s12886-018-0805-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Saito A, Igarashi A, Kobashi H. Comparison of optical quality and intraocular scattering after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole (hole ICL and Conventional ICL) implantation using the double-pass instrument. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66846. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iijima A, Shimizu K, Yamagishi M, Kobashi H, Igarashi A, Kamiya K. Assessment of subjective intraocular forward scattering and quality of vision after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central hole (Hole ICL) implantation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(8):e716–e720. doi:10.1111/aos.13092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Jiang HB, Jiang J, Wen D, Xia XB, Song WT. Comparison of Implantable Collamer Lens Visian ICL V4 and ICL V4c for high myopia: a cohort study. Medicine. 2017;96(25):e7294. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000007294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom Y, Kim DW, Ryu D, et al. Ring-shaped dysphotopsia associated with posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lenses with a central hole. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(3):e170–e178. doi:10.1111/aos.13248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Plaza E, López-Miguel A, López-de la Rosa A, et al. Effect of the EVO+ visian phakic implantable collamer lens on visual performance and quality of vision and life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;226:117–125. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2021.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Plaza E, López-Miguel A, la Rosa AL, McAlinden C, Fernández I, Maldonado MJ. EVO+ implantable collamer lens KS-aquaPORT location, stability, and impact on quality of vision and life. J Refract Surg. 2022;38(3):177–183. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20220106-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ieong A, Hau SCH, Rubin GS, Allan BDS. Quality of life in high myopia before and after implantable collamer lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(12):2295–2300. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STAAR Surgical. STAAR Surgical Investor Presentation; 2022. Available from: https://investors.staar.com/home/default.aspx. Accessed October 29, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Ye Y, Zhao J, Niu L, Shi W, Wang X, Zhou X. Long-term evaluation of anterior lens density after implantable collamer lens V4c implantation in patients with myopia over 40 years old. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;bjophthalmol-2021–319205. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Zhao J, Zhao J, et al. Changes in anterior lens density after Implantable Collamer Lens V4c implantation: a 4‐year prospective observational study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(3):326–333. doi:10.1111/aos.14584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Yang W, Zhao J, et al. A four-year observation of corneal densitometry after implantable collamer lens V4c implantation. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(7):536. doi:10.21037/atm-20-6628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan T, Yin H, Wu Z, Yang Y. Comparative study of implantable collamer lens implantation in treating four degrees of myopia: six-month observation of visual results, higher-order aberrations, and amplitude of accommodation. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45(7):839–846. doi:10.1080/02713683.2019.1701690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tañá-Rivero P, Pastor-Pascual F, Crespo M, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Muñoz-Tomás JJ, Montés-Micó R. Posterior-chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in patients over 40 years of age. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:1–8. doi:10.1155/2020/7457902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaitanya S, Anitha V, Ravindran M, Ghorpade A, Rengappa R, Uduman M. Safety and efficacy of toric implantable collamer lens V4c model – a retrospective South Indian study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(12):3006. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1492_20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstein D, Vida R, Archer T. Visual outcomes, footplate position and vault achieved with the visian implantable collamer lens for myopic astigmatism. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:4485–4497. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S330879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdev G, Singh S, Ramamurthy S, Rajpal N, Dandapani R. Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between two types of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67(7):1061. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1501_18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar