44
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Real-World Evidence of the Long-Term Effectiveness of 0.2 μg/Day Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Persistent and Recurrent Diabetic Macular Edema – A Single Center Study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 1057-1066 | Received 10 Dec 2023, Accepted 15 Feb 2024, Published online: 16 Apr 2024

References

  • Ding J, Wong TY. Current epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. Curr Diab Rep. 2012;12(4):346–354. doi:10.1007/s11892-012-0283-6
  • Adan A, Cabrera F, Figueroa MS, et al. Clinical-decision criteria to identify recurrent diabetic macular edema patients suitable for fluocinolone acetonide implant therapy (ILUVIEN((R))) and follow-up considerations/recommendations. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:2091–2107. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S252359
  • Coelho J, Malheiro L, Melo Beirao J, Meireles A, Pessoa B. Real-world retrospective comparison of 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide and 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized eyes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1751–1759. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S201611
  • Bressler NM, Beaulieu WT, Glassman AR, et al. Persistent macular thickening following intravitreous aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for central-involved diabetic macular edema with vision impairment: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(3):257–269. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6565
  • Estebainha R, Goldhardt R, Falcao M. A new approach for diabetic macular edema treatment: review of clinical practice results with 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant including vitrectomized eyes. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2020;8(1):1–10. doi:10.1007/s40135-020-00225-1
  • Boyer DS, Yoon YH, Belfort R, et al. Three-year, randomized, sham-controlled trial of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(10):1904–1914. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.024
  • Campochiaro PA, Brown DM, Pearson A, et al. Sustained delivery fluocinolone acetonide vitreous inserts provide benefit for at least 3 years in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(10):2125–2132. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.04.030
  • Das A, McGuire PG, Rangasamy S. Diabetic macular edema: pathophysiology and novel therapeutic targets. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(7):1375–1394. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.024
  • Wells JA, Glassman AR; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research N. Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(13):1193–1203.
  • Deuchler SK, Schubert R, Singh P, et al. Vitreous cytokine levels following the administration of a single 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide (ILUVIEN®) implant in patients with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME)-results from the ILUVIT study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260(8):2537–2547. doi:10.1007/s00417-00022-05564-00412
  • Habib MS. ILUVIEN((R)) technology in the treatment of center-involving diabetic macular edema: a review of the literature. Ther Deliv. 2018;9(8):547–556. doi:10.4155/tde-2018-0006
  • Messenger WB, Beardsley RM, Flaxel CJ. Fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013;7:425–434. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S44427
  • Alimera Sciences Limited. Iluvien summary of product characteristics. Available from: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/3061/smpc. Accessed March 19, 2024.
  • Campochiaro PA, Hafiz G, Shah SM, et al. Sustained ocular delivery of fluocinolone acetonide by an intravitreal insert. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(7):1393–1399 e1393. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.11.024
  • Campochiaro PA, Nguyen QD, Hafiz G, et al. Aqueous levels of fluocinolone acetonide after administration of fluocinolone acetonide inserts or fluocinolone acetonide implants. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(3):583–587. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.014
  • Alfaqawi F, Lip PL, Elsherbiny S, Chavan R, Mitra A, Mushtaq B. Report of 12-months efficacy and safety of intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant for the treatment of chronic diabetic macular oedema: a real-world result in the United Kingdom. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(4):650–656. doi:10.1038/eye.2016.301
  • Bertelmann T, Schulze S. Long-term follow-up of patient with diabetic macular edema receiving fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant. Ophthalmol Ther. 2015;4(1):51–58. doi:10.1007/s40123-015-0028-0
  • Fusi-Rubiano W, Mukherjee C, Lane M, et al. Treating diabetic macular oedema (DMO): real world UK clinical outcomes for the 0.19mg Fluocinolone Acetonide intravitreal implant (Iluvien) at 2 years. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):62. doi:10.1186/s12886-018-0726-1
  • Meireles A, Goldsmith C, El-Ghrably I, et al. Efficacy of 0.2 mug/day fluocinolone acetonide implant (ILUVIEN) in eyes with diabetic macular edema and prior vitrectomy. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(5):684–690. doi:10.1038/eye.2016.303
  • Pessoa B, Coelho J, Correia N, Ferreira N, Beirao M, Meireles A. Fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant 190 mug (ILUVIEN(R)) in vitrectomized versus nonvitrectomized eyes for the treatment of chronic diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmic Res. 2018;59(2):68–75. doi:10.1159/000484091
  • Bailey C, Chakravarthy U, Lotery A, Menon G, Talks J, Medisoft Audit G. Real-world experience with 0.2 mug/day fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN) in the United Kingdom. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(12):1707–1715. doi:10.1038/eye.2017.125
  • Rehak M, Busch C, Unterlauft JD, Jochmann C, Wiedemann P. Outcomes in diabetic macular edema switched directly or after a dexamethasone implant to a fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant following anti-VEGF treatment. Acta Diabetol. 2020;57(4):469–478. doi:10.1007/s00592-019-01439-x
  • Carneiro A, Meireles A, Castro Sousa JP, Teixeira C. Clinical impact of the 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant: outcomes from the ILUVIEN(®) clinical evidence study in Portugal. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2020;12:2515841420917768. doi:10.1177/2515841420917768
  • Campochiaro PA, Brown DM, Pearson A, et al. Long-term benefit of sustained-delivery fluocinolone acetonide vitreous inserts for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(4):626–635 e622. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.028
  • Singer MA, Sheth V, Mansour SE, Coughlin B, Gonzalez VH. Three-year safety and efficacy of the 0.19-mg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant for diabetic macular edema: the PALADIN study. Ophthalmology. 2022;129(6):605–613. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.01.015
  • Bailey C, Chakravarthy U, Lotery A, Menon G, Talks J. Extended real-world experience with the ILUVIEN® (fluocinolone acetonide) implant in the United Kingdom: 3-year results from the Medisoft® audit study. Eye (Lond). 2022;36(5):1012–1018. doi:10.1038/s41433-021-01542-w
  • Quhill H, Quhill F. Real-Life ILUVIEN (Fluocinolone Acetonide) case study: rapid drying of the macula and improved vision within 2 years after therapy initiation. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2016;7(3):301–307. doi:10.1159/000452883
  • Pessoa B, Castro C, Ferreira A, et al. Changes in Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness after Treatment with the 0.2 microg/day fluocinolone acetonide implant in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmic Res. 2022;65(3):310–320. doi:10.1159/000520411
  • Amoaku WM, Saker S, Stewart EA. A review of therapies for diabetic macular oedema and rationale for combination therapy. Eye (Lond). 2015;29(9):1115–1130. doi:10.1038/eye.2015.110
  • Chakravarthy U, Taylor SR, Koch FHJ, Castro de Sousa JP, Bailey C; Group IRSSI. Changes in intraocular pressure after intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide (ILUVIEN): real-world experience in three European countries. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(8):1072–1077. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312284
  • Khoramnia R, Peto T, Koch F, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN): 3-year results from the European IRISS registry study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022;15(321415):2022–321415.
  • Nurozler Tabakci B, Unlu N. Corticosteroid Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2017;47(3):156–160. doi:10.4274/tjo.56338