Use of Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane During Pterygium Excision: Health Economic Analysis

References

• Rezvan F, Khabazkhoob M, Hooshmand E, Yekta A, Saatchi M, Hashemi H. Prevalence and risk factors of pterygium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2018;63:719–735. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacioglu D, Erdol H. Developments and current approaches in the treatment of pterygium. Int Ophthalmol. 2017;37:1073–1081. doi:10.1007/s10792-016-0358-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prajna NV, Devi L, Seeniraj SK, Keenan JD. Conjunctival autograft versus amniotic membrane transplantation after double pterygium excision: a randomized trial. Cornea. 2016;35:823–826. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucukerdonmez C, Akova YA, Altinors DD. Comparison of conjunctival autograft with amniotic membrane transplantation for pterygium surgery: surgical and cosmetic outcome. Cornea. 2007;26:407–413. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e318033b3d4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbari M, Soltani-Moghadam R, Elmi R, Kazemnejad E. Comparison of free conjunctival autograft versus amniotic membrane transplantation for pterygium surgery. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017;29:282–286. doi:10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma DH, See LC, Liau SB, Tsai RJ. Amniotic membrane graft for primary pterygium: comparison with conjunctival autograft and topical mitomycin C treatment. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:973–978. doi:10.1136/bjo.84.9.973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munnich EL, Parente ST. Procedures take less time at ambulatory surgery centers, keeping costs down and ability to meet demand up. Health Aff. 2014;33:764–769. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Report. 2009;2009:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Desai NR, Adams B. Cryopreserved amniotic membrane using the tissuetuck technique: a sutureless approach for pterygium surgery. Cornea. 2022;42(2):181–185. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000003111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakmak HB, Dereli Can G, Can ME, Cagil N. A novel graft option after pterygium excision: platelet-rich fibrin for conjunctivoplasty. Eye. 2017;31:1606–1612. doi:10.1038/eye.2017.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong J, Fan J, Shen T, Jiang J. Comparison of self-made cryopreservative fibrin glue and commercial fibrin glue kit in pterygium surgery: 1-year follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96:e152–e155. doi:10.1111/aos.13478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Singh R. Pterygium excision and conjunctival autograft: a comparative study of techniques. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2018;11:124–128. doi:10.4103/ojo.OJO_6_2017
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang N, Xing Y, Zhao Q, Zeng S, Yang J, Du L. Application of platelet-rich fibrin grafts following pterygium excision. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75:e14560. doi:10.1111/ijcp.14560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil M, Dasar LV. Study of efficacy of fibrin glue versus sutures in pterygium. IJBAMR. 2020;9:226–232.
   Google Scholar
• Singh TA, Mamota N, Uday V, et al. Comparative study of conjunctival autograft with suture and fibrin glue in primary progressive pterygium. IJCB. 2019;34(2):230–233. doi:10.1007/s12291-017-0728-4
   Google Scholar
• Suryaa MA, Prasanth HR, Nirmale SD, Hansdak A. A randomized control trial comparing the efficacy of fibrin glue with sutures in primary pterygium surgery. Int J Ocul Oncol Oculoplasty. 2017;3:36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Sutyawan E, Niti S, Widiana R. Effect of conjunctiva-limbus transplantation with fibrin glue compare to suture technique on stability of the graft attachment in pterygium surgery. Bali Med J. 2021;2:27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wadgaonkar S, Tiwari R, Patil P, Kamble B. Fibrin glue versus suture technique for pterygium excision: a prospective study in tertiary-based rural hospital. J Clin Ophthalmol Res. 2017;5:23–27. doi:10.4103/2320-3897.195305
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zhang Y, Zhou L, Wei R, Dong L. Comparison of fibrin glue and Vicryl sutures in conjunctival autografting for pterygium surgery. Mol Vis. 2017;23:275–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alamdari DH, Sedaghat M-R, Alizadeh R, Zarei-Ghanavati S, Naseri H, Sharifi F. Comparison of autologous fibrin glue versus nylon sutures for securing conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38:1219–1224. doi:10.1007/s10792-017-0585-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sati A, Banerjee S, Kumar P, Kaushik J, Khera A. Mini-simple limbal epithelial transplantation versus conjunctival autograft fixation with fibrin glue after pterygium excision: a randomized controlled trial. Cornea. 2019;38:1345–1350. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000002007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha A, Simba A. Conjunctival autograft versus combined amniotic membrane and mini-simple limbal epithelial transplant for primary pterygium excision. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2022;17:4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrivastava S, Patkar P, Ramakrishnan R, Kanhere M, Riaz Z. Comparison of fibrin glue and autologous serum for conjunctival autograft fixation in pterygium. Delta J Ophthalmol. 2017;18:133–137. doi:10.4103/DJO.DJO_18_17
   Google Scholar
• Sune M, Sune P. Comparison between autologous blood and fibrin glue for adhering conjunctival autografts after pterygium excision- a randomised clinical trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2021;15:NC1–NC4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang H, Li S, Zhong J, et al. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a low-temperature plasma surgical system for pterygium. Cornea. 2020;39:1581–1587. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000002487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik T. In situ blood coagulum versus sutures for autograft fixation after pterygium excision. Curr Eye Res. 2018;43:977–980. doi:10.1080/02713683.2018.1470247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan B, Peng L, Peng H, Zhou S, Chen B. Modified sutureless and glue-free method versus conventional sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in primary pterygium surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Cornea. 2019;38:1351–1357. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000002137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhargava R, Kumar P, Sharma SK, Arora Y. Phacoemulsification versus manual small incision cataract surgery in patients with fuchs heterochromic iridocyclitis. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2016;5:330–334. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Degenring RF, Vey S, Kamppeter B, Budde W, Sauder G, Jonas JB. Central retinal thickness after uncomplicated small–incision cataract surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogate P, Deshpande M, Nirmalan PK. Why do phacoemulsification? Manual small-incision cataract surgery is almost as effective, but less expensive. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:965–968. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogate PM, Deshpande M, Wormald RP. Is manual small incision cataract surgery affordable in the developing countries? A cost comparison with extracapsular cataract extraction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:843–846. doi:10.1136/bjo.87.7.843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig A, Kumar J, Yorston D, Foster A. Sutureless cataract surgery with nucleus extraction: outcome of a prospective study in Nepal. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:266–270. doi:10.1136/bjo.87.3.266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kongsap P. Central corneal thickness changes following manual small incision cataract surgery versus phacoemulsification for white cataract. Rom J Ophthalmol. 2019;63:61. doi:10.22336/rjo.2019.10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parajuli S, Shrestha R, Chapagain S, Singh P, Shrestha R. Changes in central corneal thickness (CCT) and central macular thickness (CMT) following uncomplicated small-incision cataract surgery (SICS). medRxiv. 2020;2020(11):20228932.
   Google Scholar
• Ruit S, Tabin G, Chang D, et al. A prospective randomized clinical trial of phacoemulsification vs manual sutureless small-incision extracapsular cataract surgery in Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(32–38):e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.023
   Google Scholar
• Singh P, Singh S, Bhargav G, Singh M. Conjunctival flap in manual sutureless small-incision cataract surgery: a necessity or dogmatic. Int Ophthalmol. 2012;32:349–355. doi:10.1007/s10792-012-9569-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh S, Winter I, Surin L. Phacoemulsification versus small incision cataract surgery (SICS): which one is a better surgical option for immature cataract in developing countries? Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2009;1:95–100. doi:10.3126/nepjoph.v1i2.3682
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Venkatesh R, Tan CSH, Sengupta S, Ravindran RD, Krishnan KT, Chang DF. Phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery for white cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1849–1854. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillif S, Roure-Sobas C, Le-Duff F, Kodjikian L. Aqueous humor contamination during phacoemulsification in a university teaching hospital. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2012;35:153–156. doi:10.1016/j.jfo.2011.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day AC, Burr JM, Bennett K, et al. Femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification cataract surgery: randomized noninferiority trial with 1-year outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46:1360–1367. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funatsu H, Yamashita H, Noma H, Shimizu E, Mimura T, Hori S. Prediction of macular edema exacerbation after phacoemulsification in patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1355–1363. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01243-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi RS. Phacoemulsification without preoperative mydriasis in patients with age-related cataract associated with type 2 diabetes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:2427–2432. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S122107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liyanage SE, Angunawela RI, Wong SC, Little BC. Anterior chamber instability caused by incisional leakage in coaxial phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1003–1005. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perone JM, Boiche M, Lhuillier L, et al. Correlation between postoperative central corneal thickness and endothelial damage after cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. Cornea. 2018;37:587–590. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin E, Paula JS, Cruz AAV, Coelho RP. Effect of bevel position on the corneal endothelium after phacoemulsification. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2010;73:508–510. doi:10.1590/S0004-27492010000600008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengaraj V, Radhakrishnan M, Eong K-GA, et al. Visual experience during phacoemulsification under topical versus retrobulbar anesthesia: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:782–787. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.06.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts HW, Wagh VK, Sullivan DL, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45:11–20. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.08.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titiyal JS, Kaur M, Ramesh P, et al. Impact of clear corneal incision morphology on incision-site Descemet membrane detachment in conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification. Curr Eye Res. 2018;43:293–299. doi:10.1080/02713683.2017.1396616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuneoka H, Shiba T, Takahashi Y. Ultrasonic phacoemulsification using a 1.4 mm incision: clinical results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:81–86. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01235-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugurbas SC, Caliskan S, Alpay A, Ugurbas SH. Impact of intelligent phacoemulsification software on torsional phacoemulsification surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:1493–1498. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S35283
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cioba C, Marafon SB, Fortes BGB, et al. Autologous fibrin glue versus suture for conjunctival autograft in primary pterygium: a randomized clinical trial. Res Square. 2022;2022:1.
   Google Scholar
• Koranyi G, Seregard S, Kopp ED. Cut and paste: a no suture, small incision approach to pterygium surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:911–914. doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.032854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishant K, Prasad V, Shahnawaz A, Akbar MA. Comparison of ‘cut and paste (using fibrin glue)’ vs ‘cut and suture (using 8-0 vicryl sutures)’ techniques of pterygium surgery. Int J Curr Res Rev. 2014;6:64–76.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdamar Y, Mutevelli S, Han U, et al. A comparative study of tissue glue and vicryl suture for closing limbal-conjunctival autografts and histologic evaluation after pterygium excision. Cornea. 2008;27:552–558. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e318165b16d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parekh K, Patil MS, Balwir D. Fibrin glue vs vicryl (10-0) suture in limbo conjunctival autograft in the management of primary pterygium: a prospective comparative study. MVP J Med Sci. 2017;2017:4.
   Google Scholar
• Patkar P, Muley S. A comparative study of fibrin glue vs vicryl sutures for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery. Indian J Res. 2019;8:36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Priya VR, Hegde SS. A prospective comparative study to evaluate the outcome of fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting after primary pterygium excision. Int J Health Sci Res. 2015;5:93–99.
   Google Scholar
• Qi-Feng L, Wei C. Clinical observation on fibrin glue application during pterygium surgery. Int Eye Sci. 2015;2015:364–366.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin MR, Dantas PE, Nishiwaki-Dantas MC, Felberg S. Eficácia do adesivo tecidual de fibrina na fixação de enxerto conjuntival autógeno em cirurgias de pterígio primário [Efficacy of fibrin tissue adhesive in the attachment of autogenous conjuntival graft on primary pterygium surgery]. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2011;74:123–126. Portuguese. doi:10.1590/S0004-27492011000200011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar KC, Sarkar P, Mondal S, Saha RN. Comparison between fibrin glue and polyglactin sutures in limbal based conjunctival autograft technique in primary pterygium surgery in adults- A randomised controlled trial. IJCEO. 2020;6:35–40. doi:10.18231/j.ijceo.2020.009
   Google Scholar
• Vichare N, Choudhary T, Arora P. A comparison between fibrin sealant and sutures for attaching conjunctival autograft after pterygium excision. Med J Armed Forces India. 2013;69:151–155. doi:10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.09.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yüksel B, Unsal SK, Onat S. Comparison of fibrin glue and suture technique in pterygium surgery performed with limbal autograft. Int J Ophthalmol. 2010;3:316–320. doi:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2010.04.09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron E, Knoble JK. Ambulatory surgery offers quality, savings. Hospitals. 1980;54:74–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fan YP, Boldy D, Bowen D. Comparing patient satisfaction, outcomes and costs between cataract day surgery and inpatient surgery for elderly people. Aust Health Rev. 1997;20:27–39. doi:10.1071/AH970027
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stagg BC, Talwar N, Mattox C, Lee PP, Stein JD. Trends in use of ambulatory surgery centers for cataract surgery in the United States, 2001–2014. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136:53–60. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.5101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcinko DE, Hetico HR. Economic outcomes analysis from an ambulatory surgical center. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;35:544–549. doi:10.1016/S1067-2516(96)80128-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Usmani B, Iftikhar M, Latif A, Shah SMA. Epidemiology of primary ophthalmic procedures performed in the United States. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019;54:727–734. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2019.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Wu J, Geng J, Yuan Z, Huang D. Geographical prevalence and risk factors for pterygium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2013;3:e003787. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunin G, Khan K, Biggerstaff KS, Wang L, Koch DD, Khandelwal SS. Outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery performed by surgeons-in-training. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255:805–809. doi:10.1007/s00417-016-3581-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen MS, Hardten DR. Financially efficient cataract surgery in today’s healthcare environment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26:61–65. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng H, Clymer JW, Po-Han Chen B, et al. Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2018;229:134–144. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badlani N. Ambulatory surgery center ownership models. J Spine Surg. 2019;5:S195–S203. doi:10.21037/jss.2019.04.20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouhout S, Kam J, Robert MC, Harissi-Dagher M. Cost-effectiveness analysis: fibrin glue versus sutures for conjonctival fixation during pterygion surgery. Can J Ophthalmol. 2022;57:41–46. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2021.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar