Comparison of Primary Duet Lens Procedures: In-The-Bag Monofocal with Sulcus Multifocal, and Standard Single Multifocal Lens for Cataract Surgery

References

• Rementería-Capelo LA, García-Pérez JL, Gros-Otero J, et al. Visual and refractive outcomes of cataract surgeries performed in one year in a private practice setting: review of 2714 procedures. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:2421816. doi:10.1155/2020/2421816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, et al. Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(1):63–71. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behndig A, Montan P, Stenevi U, et al. Aiming for emmetropia after cataract surgery: Swedish National Cataract Register study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(7):1181–1186. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.02.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomino-Bautista C, Sánchez-Jean R, Carmona Gonzalez D, et al. Spectacle independence for pseudophakic patients - experience with a trifocal supplementary add-on intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:1043–1054. doi:10.2147/opth.S238553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javitt JC, Wang F, Trentacost DJ, et al. Outcomes of cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: functional status and quality of life. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(4):589–599. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30265-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdev GS, Sachdev M. Optimizing outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65(12):1294–1300. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1072_17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Javaloy J, et al. Comparison of a new refractive multifocal intraocular lens with an inferior segmental near add and a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(3):555–563. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagres E, Khan MA, Kyle GM, et al. Perioperative complications of intraocular lens exchange in patients with opacified Aqua-Sense lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(12):2569–2573. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.04.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Buenaga R, Alió JL, Pinilla-Cortés L, et al. Perioperative complications and clinical outcomes of intraocular lens exchange in patients with opacified lenses. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(9):2141–2146. doi:10.1007/s00417-013-2411-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altaie R, Loane E, O’Sullivan K, et al. Surgical and visual outcomes following exchange of opacified Hydroview intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:299–302. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.095414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzouri B, Dari M-L, Claoué C. Supplementary IOLs: monofocal and multifocal, their applications and limitations. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2017;6:358–363. doi:10.22608/apo.2017110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baur ID, Auffarth GU, Yildirim TM, et al. Reversibility of the duet procedure: bilateral exchange of a supplementary trifocal sulcus-fixated intraocular lens for correction of a postoperative refractive error. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020;20:100957. doi:10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100957
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gayton JL, Sanders VN. Implanting two posterior chamber intraocular lenses in a case of microphthalmos. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(6):776–777. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80349-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habot-Wilner Z, Sachs D, Cahane M, et al. Refractive results with secondary piggyback implantation to correct pseudophakic refractive errors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(11):2101–2103. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.05.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundersen KG, Potvin R. A review of results after implantation of a secondary intraocular lens to correct residual refractive error after cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1791–1796. doi:10.2147/opth.S144675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masket S, Fram NR, Cho A, et al. Surgical management of negative dysphotopsia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(1):6–16. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.10.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council. Statement ethical considerations in quality assurance and evaluation activities (NHMRC); 2014. Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/resources/ethical-considerations-quality-assurance-and-evaluation-activities. Accessed June 6, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter N, Werner L, Guan J, et al. Assessment of a new hydrophilic acrylic supplementary IOL for sulcus fixation in pseudophakic cadaver eyes. Eye. 2017;31(5):802–809. doi:10.1038/eye.2016.310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albayrak S, Comba ÖB, Karakaya M. Visual performance and patient satisfaction following the implantation of a novel trifocal supplementary intraocular lens. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(5):2346–2352. doi:10.1177/1120672120969042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman G, Dragostinoff N, Brezna W, et al. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after bilateral sequential implantation of a capsular bag IOL and a Supplementary Sulcus-Fixated Trifocal IOL. J Refract Surg. 2021;37(2):105–111. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20201215-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundersen KG, Potvin R. Refractive and Visual Outcomes After Implantation of a Secondary Toric Sulcus Intraocular Lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:1337–1342. doi:10.2147/opth.S255725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Łabuz G, Auffarth GU, Knorz MC, et al. Trifocality achieved through polypseudophakia: optical quality and light loss compared with a single trifocal intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2020;36(9):570–577. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20200715-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrecker J, Feith A, Langenbucher A. Comparison of additional pseudophakic multifocal lenses and multifocal intraocular lens in the capsular bag. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(7):915–919. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz G, Albarrán-Diego C, Belda L, et al. Add-on sulcus-based versus primary in-The-bag multifocal intraocular lens: intraindividual study. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(5):320–325. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20140422-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwase T, Tanaka N. Elevated intraocular pressure in secondary piggyback intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(9):1821–1823. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.06.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karjou Z, Jafarinasab MR, Seifi MH, et al. Secondary piggyback intraocular lens for management of residual ametropia after cataract surgery. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2021;16:12–20. doi:10.18502/jovr.v16i1.8244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Scharioth G, Riehl A. Implantation of Scharioth macula lens in patients with age-related macular degeneration: results of a prospective European multicentre clinical trial. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2019;4:e000322. doi:10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharioth GB. New add-on intraocular lens for patients with age-related macular degeneration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1559–1563. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basarir B, Kaya V, Altan C, et al. The use of a supplemental sulcus fixated IOL (HumanOptics Add-On IOL) to correct pseudophakic refractive errors. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22(6):898–903. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerten G, Kermani O, Schmiedt K, et al. Dual intraocular lens implantation: monofocal lens in the bag and additional diffractive multifocal lens in the sulcus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(12):2136–2143. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar