Advanced search
Publication Cover
Clinical Ophthalmology Volume 17, 2023 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
234
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Study Between Non-Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses

Rom Kandavel1 Colvard-Kandavel Eye Center, Encino, CA, 91316, USACorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Michael Colvard1 Colvard-Kandavel Eye Center, Encino, CA, 91316, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4615-7543View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Justin Dredge1 Colvard-Kandavel Eye Center, Encino, CA, 91316, USAView further author information
,
Michael Bayle1 Colvard-Kandavel Eye Center, Encino, CA, 91316, USAView further author information
,
Tamanna Alam1 Colvard-Kandavel Eye Center, Encino, CA, 91316, USAView further author information
,
James Snyder1 Colvard-Kandavel Eye Center, Encino, CA, 91316, USAView further author information
&
Brad Hall2 Sengi, Penniac, NB, E3A 8X8, CanadaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4097-6310View further author information
ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1161-1168 | Received 20 Dec 2022, Accepted 30 Mar 2023, Published online: 14 Apr 2023

References

  • Gatinel D, Houbrechts Y. Comparison of bifocal and trifocal diffractive and refractive intraocular lenses using an optical bench. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(7):1093–1099. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.048
  • Kohnen T, Marchini G, Alfonso JF, et al. Innovative trifocal (quadrifocal) presbyopia-correcting IOLs: 1-year outcomes from an international multicenter study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(8):1142–1148. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000232
  • Chow SSW, Chan TCY, Ng ALK, Kwok AKH. Outcomes of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after laser in situ keratomileusis. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39:1199–1204. doi:10.1007/s10792-018-0908-0
  • Schallhorn JM. Multifocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses: a comparison of data from the United States food and drug administration premarket approval trials. J Refract Surg. 2021;37(2):98–104. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20201111-02
  • Hovanesian JA, Jones M, Allen Q. The PanOptix trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 active focus and ReSTOR 3.0-add multifocal lenses: a study of patient satisfaction, visual disturbances, and uncorrected visual performance. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:983–990. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S285628
  • Cao K, Friedman DS, Jin S, et al. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses for age-related cataract patients: a system review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019;64(5):647–658. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.02.012
  • Kohnen T. Nondiffractive wavefront-shaping extended range-of-vision intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(9):1312–1313. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000247
  • Grabner G, Ang RE, Vilupuru S. The small-aperture IC-8 intraocular lens: a new concept for added depth of focus in cataract patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160(6):1176–1184 e1171. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2015.08.017
  • Bellucci R, Cargnoni M, Bellucci C. Clinical and aberrometric evaluation of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens based on spherical aberration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(7):919–926. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.02.023
  • Cochener B, Concerto Study G. Clinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens: international multicenter concerto study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(9):1268–1275. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.033
  • Ozulken K, Kiziltoprak H, Yuksel E, Mumcuoglu T. A comparative evaluation of diffractive trifocal and new refractive/extended depth of focus intraocular lenses for refractive lens exchange. Curr Eye Res. 2021;46(6):811–817. doi:10.1080/02713683.2020.1833347
  • Hovanesian JA, Jones M, Allen Q. The vivity extended range of vision IOL vs the PanOptix trifocal, ReSTOR 2.5 active focus and ReSTOR 3.0 multifocal lenses: a comparison of patient satisfaction, visual disturbances, and spectacle Independence. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:145–152. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S347382
  • Pedrotti E, Carones F, Talli P, et al. Comparative analysis of objective and subjective outcomes of two different intraocular lenses: trifocal and extended range of vision. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020;5:e000497. doi:10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000497
  • US FDA. AcrySofTM IQ VivityTM extended vision Intraocular Lens (IOL): summary of safety and effectiveness data; 2022. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/P930014S126B.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2023.
  • McCabe C, Berdahl J, Reiser H, et al. Clinical outcomes in a United States registration study of a novel extended depth of focus intraocular lens with a nondiffractive design. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(11):1297–1304. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000978
  • Bala C, Poyales F, Guarro M, et al. Multicountry clinical outcomes of a new nondiffractive presbyopia-correcting IOL. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(2):136–143. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000712
  • Kohnen T, Petermann K, Bohm M, et al. Nondiffractive wavefront-shaping extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens: visual performance and patient-reported outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(2):144–150. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000826
  • Guarro M, Sararols L, Londono GJ, et al. Visual disturbances produced after the implantation of three extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses versus one monofocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(12):1354–1359. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000988

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.