247
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparison of Efficacy of Combined Phacoemulsification and iStent Inject versus Combined Phacoemulsification and Hydrus Microstent

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1151-1159 | Received 26 Jan 2023, Accepted 24 Mar 2023, Published online: 14 Apr 2023

References

  • The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS). 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:4290–4440.
  • SooHoo JR, Seibold LK, Radcliffe NM, Kahook MY. Minimally invasive Glaucoma Surgery: current Implants and Future Innovations. Canadian J Ophthalmol. 2014;49(6):528–533. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2014.09.002
  • Jablonska J, Lewczuk K, Koponiska J, Mariak Z, Rekas M. Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery: a Review and Classification of Implant- dependent Procedures and Techniques. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022;100(2):e327–e338. doi:10.1111/aos.14906
  • Laspas P, Pfeiffer N. Hydrus Microstent. In: Sng CCA, Barton K, editors. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery. Singapore: Springer; 2021.
  • Le K, Saheb H. iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent for open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:1397–1945.
  • Young CE, Seibold LK, Kahook MY. Cataract Surgery and Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma. Current Opinion in Ophthalmolog. 2020;31(1):15–22. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000623
  • Mansberger SL, Gordon MO, Jampel H, et al. Reduction in intraocular pressure after cataract extraction. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Ophthalmol. 2012;119(9):1826–1831. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.050
  • Ahmed I, Fea A, Au L, et al. A prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Hydrus and iStent Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery Implants for Standalone Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma- The COMPARE Study. Ophthalmology. 2020;127:52–61. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.034
  • Corbett MC, Hingorani M, Boulton JE, Shilling JS. Factors predisposing to postoperative intraocular inflammation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1995;5(1):40–47. doi:10.1177/112067219500500107
  • Wang N, Chintala SK, Fini ME, Schuman JS. Ultrasound activates the TM ELAM-1/IL-1/NF-κB response: a potential mechanism for intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(5):1977–1981. doi:10.1167/iovs.02-0631
  • Poley BJ, Lindstrom RL, Samuelson TW, Schulze R. Intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes: evaluation of a causal relationship between the natural lens and open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1946–1955. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.061
  • Laroche D, Oseni J, Nkrumah G, Ng C. Clear Lensectomy with Hydrus Stent in Black and AfroLatino Patients: a 1-Year Retrospective Study. J Ophthalmol. 2022;2022:8011745. doi:10.1155/2022/8011745
  • Shaarawy T, Grehn F, Sherwood M. WGA Guidelines on Design and Reporting of Glaucoma Surgical Trials. The Hague: Kugler Publications; 2009.
  • Samuelson TW, Chang DF, Marquis R, et al. A Schlemm canal microstent for intraocular pressure reduction in primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: the HORIZON study. Ophthalmology. 2018;126(1):29–37. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.012
  • PfeiNer N, Garcia-Feijoo J, et al. A randomized trial of a Schlemm’s canal microstent with phacoemulsification for reducing intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(7):1283–1293. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.031
  • Dorairaj S, Kahook MY, Williamson BK, et al. Comparison of Goniotomy versus Trabecular Bypass Device Implantation in Glaucoma Patients Undergoing Cataract Extraction. Clin Ophthalmology. 2018;12:791. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S158403
  • Tan SZ, Au L. Manchester iStent Study: 3-year results and cost analysis. Eye. 2016;30:1365–1370. doi:10.1038/eye.2016.139
  • Fea AM, Rekas M, Au L. Evaluation of a Schlemm Canal Scaffold microstent combined with Phacoemulsification in Routine Clinical Practice: two-year Multicentre Study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;4397:886–891. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.04.039
  • Ganofi SA, Ungaro N, Ghirardini S, Tardini MG, Mora P. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Canaloplasty and Schlemm’s Canal Scaffold at 24 months’ follow up. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:3410469. doi:10.1155/2016/3410469
  • Lowe RF. Clinical types of primary angle closure glaucoma, Aust NZ. J Ophthalmol. 1988;16:245–250.
  • Wang D, He M, Weu L, Yaplee S, Singh K, Lin S. Differences in iris structural measurements among American Caucasians, American Chinese and mainland Chinese. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;40(2):162–169. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02658.x