167
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparison of Short and Long-Tunnel Needle Track for Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation in a Private Eye Center in the Philippines: A Retrospective Study

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1691-1699 | Received 25 Jan 2023, Accepted 17 May 2023, Published online: 21 Jun 2023

References

  • Riva I, Roberti G, Oddone F, Konstas AGP, Quaranta L. Ahmed glaucoma valve implant: surgical technique and complications. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:357–367. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S104220
  • Garcia-Feijoo J, Cuiña-Sardiña R, Méndez-Fernández C, Castillo-Gómez A, García-Sánchez J. Peritubular filtration as cause of severe hypotony after Ahmed valve implantation for glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:571–572. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01057-1
  • Choo J, Chen ZD, Koh V, et al. Outcomes and complications of Ahmed tube implantation in Asian eyes. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:733–738. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001004
  • Eslami Y, Azaripour E, Mohammadi M, et al. Single long scleral tunnel technique for prevention of Ahmed valve tube exposure. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;9(1):52–56.
  • Lama P, Fechtner R. Tube erosion following insertion of a glaucoma drainage device with a pericardial patch graft. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(9):1243–1244. doi:10.1001/archopht.117.9.1243
  • Kalamkar C, Radke N, Mukherjee A, Radke S. A new surgical technique of intra-scleral tube fixation in Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: ‘scleral sleeve method’. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2017;31:234–237. doi:10.1016/j.sjopt.2017.04.002
  • Gdih G, Jiang K. Graft-free Ahmed valve implantation through a 6 mm scleral tunnel. Canad J Ophalmol. 2017;2(1):85–91. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.06.007
  • Wolfe A, Hod Y, Buckman G, Stein N, Geyer O. Use of autologous scleral graft in Ahmed glaucoma valve surgery. J Glaucoma. 2016;25:365–370. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000232
  • Rivera J, Leuenberger E, Veloso MI. A retrospective review of autologous scleral flap versus donor scleral graft. Philipp J Ophthalmol. 2008;33(1):17–21.
  • Valimaki J. Fibrin glue for preventing immediate postoperative hypotony following glaucoma drainage implant surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84:372–374. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00653.x
  • Leong JK, McCluskey P, Lightman S, Towler HM. Outcome of graft free Molteno tube insertion. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:501–505. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.079087
  • Albis-Donado O, Gil-Carrasco F, Romero-Quijada R, Thomas R. Evaluation of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation through a needle- generated scleral tunnel in Mexican children with glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010;58:365–373. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.67039
  • Kim D-H, Park C-K, Ahn M-D. Clinical results of Ahmed valve implantation in the aspects of complications. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003;44:888–895.
  • Huang MC, Netland PA, Coleman AL, Siegner SW, Moster MR, Hill RA. Intermediate term clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:27–33. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00394-8
  • Ayyala RS, Zurakowski D, Smith JA, et al. A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1968–1976. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91049-1
  • Taglia DP, Perkins TW, Gangnon R, Heatley GA, Kaufman PL. Comparison of the Ahmed glaucoma valve, the Krupin eye valve with disk, and the double-plate Molteno implant. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:347–353. doi:10.1097/00061198-200208000-00012
  • Park HY, Lee NY, Park CK. Risk factors of shallow anterior chamber other than hypotony after Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. J Glaucoma. 2009;18:44–48. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31816b2fe7
  • Chow A, Burkemper B, Varma R, Rodger DC, Rao N, Richter GM. Comparison of surgical outcomes of trabeculectomy, Ahmed shunt, and Baerveldt shunt in uveitic glaucoma. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2018;8:9. doi:10.1186/s12348-018-0150-y
  • Jones E, Alaghband P, Cheng J, Beltran-Agullo L, Lim KS. Preimplantation flow testing of Ahmed glaucoma valve and the early postoperative clinical outcome. J Cur Glauco Pract. 2013;7(1):1–5. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1128
  • Chiam PJ, Chen X, Haque MS, Sung V. Outcome of fixed volume intracameral sodium hyaluronate 1.4% injection for early post-operative hypotony after Baerveldt glaucoma implant. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;46(9):1035–1040. doi:10.1111/ceo.13347
  • Stein JD, McCoy AN, Asrani S, et al. Surgical management of hypotony owing to overfiltration in eyes receiving glaucoma drainage devices. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(8):638–641. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31819aa4e0
  • Feinstein M, Moussa K, Han Y. Ab interno tube occlusion for postoperative hypotony in a patient with an Ahmed glaucoma drainage device. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(3):e61–e63. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000869
  • Perez C, Verdaguer S, Khaliliyeh D, Maul M, Ou Y, Han Y. Subconjunctival injections of Mitomycin C are associated with a lower incidence of hypertensive phase in eyes with Ahmed Glaucoma Valve. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2021;4(3):322–329. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2020.10.004
  • Arpa P, Arpa C. Ahmed glaucoma valve in vitrectomized eyes: an implantation technique to minimize early postoperative fluid-loss hypotony. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(5):2759–2764. doi:10.1177/11206721211012200
  • Jeong HJ, Young H, Park L, Park CK. Effects of early postoperative intraocular pressure after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation on long-term surgical outcomes. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018;32(5):391–399. doi:10.3341/kjo.2017.0102
  • Pakravan M, Rad SS, Yazdani S, Ghahari E, Yaseri M. Effect of early treatment with aqueous suppressants on Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation outcome. Ophthalmol Amn Acad Ophthalmol. 2014;121(9):1693–1698.
  • Wishart PK, Choudhary A, Wong D. Ahmed glaucoma valves in refractory glaucoma: a 7-year audit. Clinical Science Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;94:1174e1179.
  • Roy AK, Senthil S. Management of implant plate exposure of silicone Ahmed glaucoma valve: a review of six cases. GMS Ophthalmol Cas. 2016;6. doi:10.3205/oc000047
  • Byun YS, Lee NY, Park CK. Risk factors of implant exposure outside the conjunctiva after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2009;53(2):114–119. doi:10.1007/s10384-008-0630-y