Randomized Trial Comparing Prediction Accuracy of Two Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometers

References

• Vogel A, Dick BH, Krummenauer F. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1961–1968. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01214-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:644–648. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G, Huang J. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:62–67. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes-Mico R, Pastor-Pascual F, Ruiz-Mesa R, Tana-Rivero P. Ocular biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47:802–814. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CM, Lim DH, Kim HJ, Chung TY. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0223114. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HK, Kim MK. Comparison of a new swept-source optical biometer with a partial coherence interferometry. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18:269. doi:10.1186/s12886-018-0936-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C, Chonpimai P, Loket S. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2224–2232. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.03.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akman A, Asena L, Gungor SG. Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:1201–1205. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch DD, Ali SF, Weikert MP, Shirayama M, Jenkins R, Wang L. Contribution of posterior corneal astigmatism to total corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:2080–2087. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.08.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Yuan F, Wu L. Metaanalysis of intraocular lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery in myopic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:163–170. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha-de-Lossada C, Rodriguez-Vallejo M, Rachwani-Anil R, Burguera N, Fernandez J. Predicted refraction variability due to reliability of nine optical biometers for intraocular lens power calculation. J Refract Surg. 2022;38:120–127. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20211122-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes-Mico R. Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48:16–25. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higashiyama T, Mori H, Nakajima F, Ohji M. Comparison of a new biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a conventional biometer using partial coherence interferometry. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0196401. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shammas HJ, Ortiz S, Shammas MC, Kim SH, Chong C. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:50–61. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Chen M, Ning R, et al. The precision of a new anterior segment optical coherence tomographer and its comparison with a swept-source OCT-based optical biometer in patients with cataract. J Refract Surg. 2021;37:616–622. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20210610-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shammas HJ, Taroni L, Pellegrini M, et al. Accuracy of newer intraocular lens power formulas in short and long eyes using sum-of-segments biometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48:1113–1120. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omoto MK, Torii H, Masui S, Ayaki M, Tsubota K, Negishi K. Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices. Sci Rep. 2019;9:6557. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42968-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini G, Hoffer KJ. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery. Eye Vis. 2018;5:18. doi:10.1186/s40662-018-0110-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundstrom M, Dickman M, Henry Y, et al. Risk factors for refractive error after cataract surgery: analysis of 282 811 cataract extractions reported to the European registry of quality outcomes for cataract and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:447–452. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabian E, Wehner W. Prediction accuracy of total keratometry compared to standard keratometry using different intraocular lens power formulas. J Refract Surg. 2019;35:362–368. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190422-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JY, Choi A, Kwon H, Jeon S. Accuracy of IOL power calculation formulas for quadrifocal AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT implantation in patients with previous corneal refractive surgery: comparison of SS-OCT-based biometers. J Refract Surg. 2021;37:836–841. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20210812-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamaoki A, Kojima T, Hasegawa A, et al. Clinical Evaluation of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Biometer That Uses Individual Refractive Indices to Measure Axial Length in Cataract Patients. Ophthalmic Res. 2019;62:11–23. doi:10.1159/000496690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar