Refractive Predictability and Biometry Agreement of a Combined Swept Source Optical Coherence and Reflectometry Biometer Compared to an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer and an SS-OCT Biometer

References

• de Vries NE, Webers CA, Touwslager WR, et al. Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(5):859–865. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.11.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons A, Ali TK, Waren DP, Donaldson KE. Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1965–1970. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S114890
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epitropoulos AT, Matossian C, Berdy GJ, Malhotra RP, Potvin R. Effect of tear osmolarity on repeatability of keratometry for cataract surgery planning. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(8):1672–1677. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(5):472–485. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2007.00879.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Hacker P, Pfeiffer N, Dick HB. Capsular bag shrinkage after implantation of a capsular bending or capsular tension ring. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(10):1915–1920. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.06.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18(2):125–129. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80917-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(3):368–376. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini G, Hoffer KJ. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery. Eye Vis. 2018;5:18. doi:10.1186/s40662-018-0110-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fam HB, Lim KL. Improving refractive outcomes at extreme axial lengths with the IOLMaster: the optical axial length and keratometric transformation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(5):678–683. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.148452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Shirayama M, Ma XJ, Kohnen T, Koch DD. Optimizing intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with axial lengths above 25.0 mm. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(11):2018–2027. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Koch DD. Modified axial length adjustment formulas in long eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(11):1396–1397. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.07.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C, Chonpimai P, Loket S. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography–based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography–based optical biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(10):2224–2232. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.03.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisus AD, Hirnschall ND, Ruiss M, Pilwachs C, Georgiev S, Findl O. Repeatability of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and one optical low coherence reflectometry biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(10):1302–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Cao D, Weikert MP, Koch DD. Calculation of axial length using a single group refractive index versus using different refractive indices for each ocular segment: theoretical study and refractive outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(5):663–670. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shammas HJ, Ortiz S, Shammas MC, Kim SH, Chong C. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):50–61. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Koch DD, Hill W, Abulafia A. Pursuing perfection in intraocular lens calculations: III. Criteria for analyzing outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(8):999–1002. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson MJ, Charman WN. The effect of testing distance on intraocular lens power calculation. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(11):726. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20141021-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill WE, Abulafia A, Wang L, Koch DD. Pursuing perfection in IOL calculations. II. Measurement foibles: measurement errors, validation criteria, IOL constants, and lane length. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(7):869–870. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SY, Feng Z, Yi X. A general introduction to adjustment for multiple comparisons. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(6):1725–1729. doi:10.21037/jtd.2017.05.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer KJ, Aramberri J, Haigis W, et al. Protocols for studies of intraocular lens formula accuracy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160(3):403–405.e401. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2015.05.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omoto MK, Torii H, Masui S, Ayaki M, Tsubota K, Negishi K. Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6557. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42968-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke DL, Cooke TL. A comparison of two methods to calculate axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(3):284–292. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.10.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shammas HJ, Shammas MC, Jivrajka RV, Cooke DL, Potvin R. Effects on IOL power calculation and expected clinical outcomes of axial length measurements based on multiple vs single refractive indices. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:1511–1519. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S256851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett GD. An improved universal theoretical formula for intraocular lens power prediction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(6):713–720. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80339-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shammas HJ, Taroni L, Pellegrini M, Shammas MC, Jivrajka RV. Accuracy of newer intraocular lens power formulas in short and long eyes using sum-of-segments biometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(10):1113–1120. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goss DA, Grosvenor T. Reliability of refraction--a literature review. J Am Optom Assoc. 1996;67(10):619–630.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatinel D, Haouat M, Hoang-Xuan T. Etude des paramètres permettant la description mathématique de l'asphéricite cornéenne [A review of mathematical descriptors of corneal asphericity]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2002;25(1):81–90. French.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerdrum B, Gundersen KG, Lundmark PO, Aakre BM. Repeatability of OCT-based versus scheimpflug- and reflection-based keratometry in patients with hyperosmolar and normal tear film. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:3991–4003. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S280868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar