References
- Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C, Chonpimai P, et al. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2224–2232.
- Akman A, Asena L, Güngör SG. Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(9):1201–1205. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307779
- Kunert KS, Peter M, Blum M, et al. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):76–83. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.039
- Shajari M, Cremonese C, Petermann K, Singh P, Müller M, Kohnen T. Comparison of axial length, corneal curvature, and anterior chamber depth measurements of 2 recently introduced devices to a known biometer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;178:58–64. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.02.027
- Lee HK, Kim MK. Comparison of a new swept-source optical biometer with a partial coherence interferometry. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):269. doi:10.1186/s12886-018-0936-6
- Bullimore MA, Slade S, Yoo P, Otani T. An evaluation of the IOLMaster 700. Eye Contact Lens. 2019;45(2):117–123. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000552
- Yang CM, Lim DH, Kim HJ, Chung TY, Grulkowski I. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0223114. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223114
- Huang J, Zhao Y, Savini G, et al. Reliability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer in healthy children, adults, and cataract patients. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:8946364. doi:10.1155/2020/8946364
- Shi Q, Wang GY, Cheng YH, Pei C. Comparison of IOL-master 700 and IOL-master 500 biometers in ocular biological parameters of adolescents. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(7):1013–1017. doi:10.18240/ijo.2021.07.08
- Jiang J, Pan X, Zhou M, Wang X, Zhu H, Li D. A comparison of IOLMaster 500 and IOLMaster 700 in the measurement of ocular biometric parameters in cataract patients. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):12770. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-16985-8
- McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K. Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(4):330–338. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x
- McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) studies and sample-size calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(12):2598–2604. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.06.029
- Mohamed A, Nankivil D, Pesala V, et al. The precision of ophthalmic biometry using calipers. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013;48(6):506–511. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.07.007
- Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(3):368–376. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.031
- Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(5):472–485. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2007.00879.x