159
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparison Between Pulsed and Continuous Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking Protocols

, ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 1407-1413 | Received 18 Feb 2023, Accepted 10 May 2023, Published online: 16 May 2023

References

  • Romero-Jiménez M, Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS. Keratoconus: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33(4):157–166. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2010.04.006
  • Gomes JAP, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, et al. Global consensus on Keratoconus and ectatic diseases. Cornea. 2015;34(4):359–369. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000408
  • Mohammadpour M, Heidari Z, Hashemi H. Updates on managements for Keratoconus. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018;30(2):110–124. doi:10.1016/j.joco.2017.11.002
  • Jhanji V, Sharma N, Vajpayee RB. Management of keratoconus: current scenario. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(8):1044–1050. doi:10.1136/bjo.2010.185868
  • Vohra V, Tuteja S, Chawla H. Collagen cross linking for Keratoconus. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright; 2021.
  • Kobashi H, Rong SS. Corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8145651. doi:10.1155/2017/8145651
  • Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Stress-strain measurements of human and porcine corneas after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A-induced cross-linking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(9):1780–1785. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00407-3
  • Santhiago MR, Randleman JB. The biology of corneal cross-linking derived from ultraviolet light and riboflavin. Exp Eye Res. 2021;202:108355. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2020.108355
  • Koller T, Mrochen M, Seiler T. Complication and failure rates after corneal crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(8):1358–1362. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.035
  • Moramarco A, Mastrofilippo V, Romano MG, et al. Efficacy and safety of accelerated corneal cross-linking for progressive Keratoconus: a 5-year follow-up study. J Refract Surg. 2020;36(11):724–730. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20200819-01
  • Sherif AM. Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen cross-linking in the treatment of mild keratoconus: a comparative study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:1435–1440. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S59840
  • Chan C. Corneal cross-linking for Keratoconus: current knowledge and practice and future trends. Asia-Pacific J Ophthalmol. 2020;9(6):557–564. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000335
  • Moramarco A, Iovieno A, Sartori A, et al. Corneal stromal demarcation line after accelerated crosslinking using continuous and pulsed light. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(11):2546–2551. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.04.033
  • Seiler T, Hafezi F. Corneal cross-linking-induced stromal demarcation line. Cornea. 2006;25(9):1057–1059. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000225720.38748.58
  • Ng ALK, Chan TCY, Lai JSM, et al. Comparison of the central and peripheral corneal stromal demarcation line depth in conventional versus accelerated collagen cross-linking. Cornea. 2015;34(11):1432–1436. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000626
  • Salah Y, Omar K, Sherif A, et al. Study of demarcation line depth in transepithelial versus epithelium-off accelerated cross-linking (AXL) in Keratoconus. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:3904565. doi:10.1155/2019/3904565
  • Ozek D, Kemer OE, Ozer PA. Corneal stromal depth of the demarcation line in ‘accelerated corneal cross-linking’ with different concentrations of riboflavin solutions. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(6):1329–1335. doi:10.1007/s10792-018-0951-x
  • Thorsrud A, Sandvik GF, Hagem AM, et al. Measuring the depth of crosslinking demarcation line in vivo: comparison of methods and devices. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(2):255–262. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.01.003
  • Tzamalis A, Vinciguerra R, Romano V, et al. Intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver agreement of demarcation line depth measurements following corneal cross linking. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020;30(4):635–642. doi:10.1177/1120672119835116
  • Pircher N, Lammer J, Holzer S, et al. Correlation between central stromal demarcation line depth and changes in K values after corneal cross-linking (CXL). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(4):759–764. doi:10.1007/s00417-018-3922-z
  • Mesen A, Bozkurt B, Kamis U, et al. Correlation of demarcation line depth with medium-term efficacy of different corneal collagen cross-linking protocols in Keratoconus. Cornea. 2018;37(12):1511–1516. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001733
  • Abdel-Radi M, Eldaly Z, Abdelmotaal H, et al. Correlation between corneal demarcation line depth in epithelium-off and trans-epithelium accelerated corneal cross linking and keratoconus progression. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020;13(6):907–912. doi:10.18240/ijo.2020.06.08
  • Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Paradiso AL, et al. Pulsed light accelerated crosslinking versus continuous light accelerated crosslinking: one-year results. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:604731. doi:10.1155/2014/604731
  • Peyman A, Nouralishahi A, Hafezi F, et al. Stromal demarcation line in pulsed versus continuous light accelerated corneal cross-linking for Keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(3):206–208. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160204-03
  • Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Caragiuli S, et al. Pulsed vs continuous light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking: in vivo qualitative investigation by confocal microscopy and corneal OCT. Eye. 2014;28(10):1179–1183. doi:10.1038/eye.2014.163
  • Gatzioufas Z, Balidis M, Kozeis N. Is the corneal stromal demarcation line depth a true indicator of corneal collagen crosslinking efficacy? J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(5):804. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.02.043