Accuracy of the Lacrimal Syringing Test in Relation to Dacryocystography and Dacryoendoscopy

References

• Conway ST. Evaluation and management of ‘functional’ nasolacrimal blockage: results of a survey of the American society of ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;10(3):185–7; discussion 188. doi:10.1097/00002341-199409000-00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuthbertson FM, Webber S. Assessment of functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction—a survey of ophthalmologists in the southwest. Eye. 2004;18(1):20–23. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6700522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh GM, Gauba V, Tsangaris P, et al. Digital subtraction dacryocystography and syringing in the management of epiphora. Orbit. 2007;26(4):249–253. doi:10.1080/01676830600987375
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shapira Y, Juniat V, Macri C, et al. Syringing has limited reliability in differentiating nasolacrimal duct stenosis from functional delay. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260(9):3037–3042. doi:10.1007/s00417-022-05654-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlin S, Chen E. Evaluation of the lacrimal drainage function by the drop test. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122(5):701–708. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(14)70490-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montecalvo RM, Zegel HG, Barnett FJ, et al. Evaluation of the lacrimal apparatus with digital subtraction macrodacryocystography. RadioGraphics. 1990;10(3):483–490. doi:10.1148/radiographics.10.3.2188309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Ali MJ, Paulsen F. Dacryocystography: from theory to current practice. Ann Anat. 2019;224:33–40. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2019.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapira Y, Macri C, Usmani E, et al. Outcomes of intubation and endoscopic DCR in functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Rhinology. 2022;60(4):308–312. doi:10.4193/Rhin22.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzek JP, Ching AS, Hoang T-A, et al. Clinical and radiologic lacrimal testing in patients with epiphora. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(11):1875–1881. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30013-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshi S, Tasaki K, Maruo K, et al. Improvement in dacryoendoscopic visibility after image processing using comb-removal and image-sharpening algorithms. J Clin Med. 2022;11(8):2073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javate RM, Pamintuan FG, Cruz RT Jr. Efficacy of endoscopic lacrimal duct recanalization using microendoscope. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26(5):330–333. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181c7577a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamao T, Zheng X, Shiraishi A. Outcomes of bicanalicular nasal stent inserted by sheath-guided dacryoendoscope in patients with lacrimal passage obstruction: a retrospective observational study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021;21(1):103. doi:10.1186/s12886-020-01678-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SE, Beak JU, Paik J-S, et al. Long-term efficacy of dacryoendoscopy-guided recanalization and silicone tube intubation. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2022;36(3):185–193. doi:10.3341/kjo.2021.0117
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee SM, Lew H. Transcanalicular endoscopic dacryoplasty in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259(1):173–180. doi:10.1007/s00417-020-04833-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitnall SE. Anatomy of the Human Orbit and Accessory Organs of Vision. Huntington, NY: Krieger Publishing; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura J, Kamao T, Mitani A, et al. Analysis of lacrimal duct morphology from cone-beam computed tomography dacryocystography in a Japanese population. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:2057–2067. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S370800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmerich KH, Meyer-Rüsenberg HW, Simko P. Endoscopy of the lacrimal drainage system. Ophthalmologe. 1997;94(10):732–735. doi:10.1007/s003470050195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki T. Transcanalicular lacrimal surgery with a miniature caliber endoscope. Jpn J Ophthalmic Surg. 2003;16(4):485–491.
   Google Scholar
• Kominek P, Della Rocca R, Rosenbaum S. Diagnostics. In: Atlas of Lacrimal Surgery. Springer; 2007:29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Patrinely JR, Anderson RL. A review of lacrimal drainage surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;2(2):97–102. doi:10.1097/00002341-198601050-00008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae SH, Park J, Lee JK. Comparison of digital subtraction dacryocystography and dacryoendoscopy in patients with epiphora. Eye. 2021;35(3):877–882. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-0990-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon J, Birchall IWJ, Virjee J. The role of dacryocystography in the management of patients with epiphora. Br J Radiol. 1990;63(749):337–339. doi:10.1259/0007-1285-63-749-337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beigi B, Uddin JM, McMullan TFW, et al. Inaccuracy of diagnosis in a cohort of patients on the waiting list for dacryocystorhinostomy when the diagnosis was made by only syringing the lacrimal system. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17(4):485–489. doi:10.1177/112067210701700401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapira Y, Macri C, Usmani E, et al. DCR for nasolacrimal duct stenosis may be less effective than for complete obstruction. Eye. 2023;37(4):760–763. doi:10.1038/s41433-022-02048-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgit ET, Yüksel D, Unal M, et al. Transluminal balloon dilatation of the lacrimal drainage system for the treatment of epiphora. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(6):1517–1524. doi:10.2214/ajr.165.6.7484599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen FP, Thale AB, Maune S, et al. New insights into the pathophysiology of primary acquired dacryostenosis. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(12):2329–2336. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00946-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar