Surgical Time and Postoperative Symptoms Study in Pterygium Excision and Amniotic Membrane Graft Using Celularity Triple Layer Dehydrated Amniotic Membrane

References

• Modenese A, Gobba F. Occupational exposure to solar radiation at different latitudes and pterygium: a systematic review of the last 10 years of scientific literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;15(1):37. doi:10.3390/ijerph15010037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM, Tan D. Pterygium: prevalence, demography and risk factors. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1999;6(3):219–228. doi:10.1076/opep.6.3.219.1504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rezvan F, Khabazkhoob M, Hooshmand E, Yekta A, Saatchi M, Hashemi H. Prevalence and risk factors of pterygium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2018;63(5):719–735. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young AL, Cao D, Chu WK, et al. The Evolving Story of Pterygium. Cornea. 2018;37(Suppl 1):S55–S57. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001744
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rock T, Bramkamp M, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Rock D. A retrospective study to compare the recurrence rate after treatment of pterygium by conjunctival autograft, primary closure, and amniotic membrane transplantation. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:7976–7981. doi:10.12659/MSM.915629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard JD, Mansur A, Comstock TL, Hovanesian JA. An update on the surgical management of pterygium and the role of loteprednol etabonate ointment. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:1105–1118. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S55259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anguria P, Ntuli S, Carmichael T. Young patient’s age determines pterygium recurrence after surgery. Afr Health Sci. 2014;14(1):72–76. doi:10.4314/ahs.v14i1.11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campagna G, Adams M, Wang L, Khandelwal S, Al-Mohtaseb Z. Comparison of pterygium recurrence rates among different races and ethnicities after primary pterygium excision by surgeons in training. Cornea. 2018;37(2):199–204. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodavoor SK, Ramamurthy D, Solomon R. Outcomes of pterygium surgery-glue versus autologous blood versus sutures for graft fixation-an analysis. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(3):227–231. doi:10.4103/ojo.OJO_4_2017
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koranyi G, Seregard S, Kopp ED. Cut and paste: a no suture, small incision approach to pterygium surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(7):911–914. doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.032854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda A, Kumar S, Kumar A, Bansal R, Bhartiya S. Fibrin glue in ophthalmology. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009;57(5):371–379. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.55079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik T. In situ blood coagulum versus sutures for autograft fixation after pterygium excision. Curr Eye Res. 2018;43(8):977–980. doi:10.1080/02713683.2018.1470247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh PK, Singh S, Vyas C, Singh M. Conjunctival autografting without fibrin glue or sutures for pterygium surgery. Cornea. 2013;32(1):104–107. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31824bd1fb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiti R, Mukherjee S, Hota D. Recurrence rate and graft stability with fibrin glue compared with suture and autologous blood coagulum for conjunctival autograft adherence in pterygium surgery: a meta-analysis. Cornea. 2017;36(10):1285–1294. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes M, Sridhar MS, Sangwan VS, Rao GN. Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction. Cornea. 2005;24(6):643–653. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000151501.80952.c5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon HK, Bahadur H, Raj A. A comparative study of tarsorrhaphy and amniotic membrane transplantation in the healing of persistent corneal epithelial defects. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(1):29–33. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_617_19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekaris I, Mravicic I, Barisic A, Draca N, Pauk M. Amniotic membrane transplantation in the treatment of persistent epithelial defect on the corneal graft. Coll Antropol. 2010;34(Suppl 2):15–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dua HS, Said DG, Messmer EM, et al. Neurotrophic keratopathy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018;66:107–131. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekaris I, Gabric N, Mravicic I, et al. Multilayer vs. monolayer amniotic membrane transplantation for deep corneal ulcer treatment. Coll Antropol. 2001;25:23–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen H-J, Pires RTF, Tseng SCG. Amniotic membrane transplantation for severe neurotrophic corneal ulcers. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:826–833. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00918-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Protzman NM, John N, et al. An in vitro comparison of human corneal epithelial cell activity and inflammatory response on differently designed ocular amniotic membranes and a clinical case study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2023;111(3):684–700. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.35186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim-Bon-Siong R, Valluri S, Gordon ME, Pepose JS. Efficacy and safety of the ProTek (Vifilcon A) therapeutic soft contact lens after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(2):169–176. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(99)80087-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu F, Li M, Yan Y, Lu K, Cui L, Chen Q. A novel technique of sutureless and glueless conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery by electrocautery pen. Cornea. 2013;32(3):290–295. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31824f8c15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donepudi GD, Ramesh S, Govindarajulu M, et al. Early postoperative outcomes of pterygium surgery: sutures versus autogenous serum in-situ fixation of limbal conjunctival autograft. Life Sci. 2019;221:93–98. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2019.02.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucukerdonmez C, Karalezli A, Akova YA, Borazan M. Amniotic membrane transplantation using fibrin glue in pterygium surgery: a comparative randomised clinical trial. Eye. 2010;24(4):558–566. doi:10.1038/eye.2009.136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syam PP, Eleftheriadis H, Liu CS. Inferior conjunctival autograft for primary pterygia. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(4):806–810. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01970-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natung T, Keditsu A, Shullai W, Goswami PK. Sutureless, glue-less conjunctival autograft versus conjunctival autograft with sutures for primary, advanced pterygia: an interventional pilot study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(8):NC04–NC07. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2017/23839.10419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uy HS, Reyes JM, Flores JD, Lim-Bon-Siong R. Comparison of fibrin glue and sutures for attaching conjunctival autografts after pterygium excision. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(4):667–671. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.08.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher S, Conlon R, Teja S, et al. Fibrin glue versus autologous blood for conjunctival autograft fixation in pterygium surgery. Can J Ophthalmol. 2015;50(4):269–272. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhasawat P, Barton K, Burkett G, Tseng SC. Comparison of conjunctival autografts, amniotic membrane grafts, and primary closure for pterygium excision. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(6):974–985. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30197-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain AK, Bansal R, Sukhija J. Human amniotic membrane transplantation with fibrin glue in management of primary pterygia: a new tuck-in technique. Cornea. 2008;27(1):94–99. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e318158b47f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirsova K, Jones GLA. Amniotic membrane in ophthalmology: properties, preparation, storage and indications for grafting-a review. Cell Tissue Bank. 2017;18(2):193–204. doi:10.1007/s10561-017-9618-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra C, Jain AK. Human amniotic membrane transplantation: different modalities of its use in ophthalmology. World J Transplant. 2014;4(2):111–121. doi:10.5500/wjt.v4.i2.111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solomon A, Pires RT, Tseng SC. Amniotic membrane transplantation after extensive removal of primary and recurrent pterygia. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(3):449–460. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00567-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholipourmalekabadi M, Farhadihosseinabadi B, Faraji M, Nourani MR. How preparation and preservation procedures affect the properties of amniotic membrane? How safe are the procedures? Burns. 2020;46(6):1254–1271. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia M, Pereira M, Rana H, et al. The mechanism of cell interaction and response on decellularized human amniotic membrane: implications in wound healing. Wounds. 2007;19(8):207–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramuta TZ, Kreft ME. Human amniotic membrane and amniotic membrane-derived cells: how far are we from their use in regenerative and reconstructive urology? Cell Transplant. 2018;27(1):77–92. doi:10.1177/0963689717725528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koob TJ, Lim JJ, Zabek N, Massee M. Cytokines in single layer amnion allografts compared to multilayer amnion/chorion allografts for wound healing. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015;103(5):1133–1140. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.33265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer A, Rogowski W. Systematic review of economic evaluations of human cell-derived wound care products for the treatment of venous leg and diabetic foot ulcers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:115. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar