Combined MIGS: Comparing Additive Effects of Phacoemulsification, Endocyclophotocoagulation, and Kahook Dual Blade

References

• Mai DD, Ingram Z, Oberfeld B, Solá-Del Valle D. Combined microinvasive glaucoma surgery - a review of the literature and future directions. Semin Ophthalmol. 2023;1–8. doi:10.1080/08820538.2023.2181665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klug E, Chachanidze M, Nirappel A, et al. Outcomes of phacoemulsification and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation performed with dual blade ab interno trabeculectomy or trabecular micro-bypass stent insertion. Eye Lond Eng. 2021. doi:10.1038/s41433-021-01475-4
   Google Scholar
• Uram M. Combined phacoemulsification, endoscopic ciliary process photocoagulation, and intraocular lens implantation in glaucoma management. Ophthalmic Surg. 1995;26(4):346–352.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Netland PA, Mansberger SL, Lin S. Uncontrolled intraocular pressure after endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation. J Glaucoma. 2007;16(2):265–267. doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000243475.36213.41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold LK, SooHoo JR, Kahook MY. Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015;22(1):18–24. doi:10.4103/0974-9233.148344
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anand N, Klug E, Nirappel A, Solá-Del Valle D. A review of cyclodestructive procedures for the treatment of glaucoma. Semin Ophthalmol. 2020;35(5–6):261–275. doi:10.1080/08820538.2020.1810711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorairaj SK, Seibold LK, Radcliffe NM, et al. 12-month outcomes of goniotomy performed using the kahook dual blade combined with cataract surgery in eyes with medically treated glaucoma. Adv Ther. 2018;35(9):1460–1469. doi:10.1007/s12325-018-0755-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElMallah MK, Seibold LK, Kahook MY, et al. 12-month retrospective comparison of kahook dual blade excisional goniotomy with istent trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucomatous eyes at the time of cataract surgery. Adv Ther. 2019;36(9):2515–2527. doi:10.1007/s12325-019-01025-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieck EG, Epstein RS, Kennedy JB, et al. Outcomes of Kahook Dual Blade goniotomy with and without phacoemulsification cataract extraction. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2018;1(1):75–81. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2018.06.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Le C, Kazaryan S, Hubbell M, Zurakowski D, Ayyala RS. Surgical outcomes of phacoemulsification followed by istent implantation versus goniotomy with the kahook dual blade in patients with mild primary open-angle glaucoma with a minimum of 12-month follow-up. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(5):411–414. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura-Abreu N, García-Feijoo J, Pazos M, Biarnés M, Morales-Fernández L, Martínez-de-la-casa JM. Twelve-month results of ab interno trabeculectomy with Kahook Dual Blade: an interventional, randomized, controlled clinical study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259(9):2771–2781. doi:10.1007/s00417-021-05213-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwasaki K, Takamura Y, Orii Y, Arimura S, Inatani M. Performances of glaucoma operations with Kahook Dual Blade or iStent combined with phacoemulsification in Japanese open angle glaucoma patients. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020;13(6):941–945. doi:10.18240/ijo.2020.06.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki R, Hirooka K, Goda E, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between microhook ab interno trabeculotomy and goniotomy with the Kahook Dual Blade in combination with phacoemulsification: a retrospective, comparative case series. Adv Ther. 2021;38(1):329–336. doi:10.1007/s12325-020-01543-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari E, Loganathan D. 12-month clinical outcomes of combined phacoemulsification and ab interno trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma in the United Kingdom. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0252826. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkenberry S, Singh IP, Crane CJ, et al. Excisional goniotomy vs trabecular microbypass stent implantation: a prospective randomized clinical trial in eyes with mild to moderate open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(8):1165–1171. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter M, Garza A, Gallardo M. Excisional goniotomy in latino patients with open-angle glaucoma: outcomes through 24 months. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:3619–3625. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S271923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izquierdo JC, Agudelo N, Rubio B, et al. Combined phacoemulsification and 360-degree endocyclophotocoagulation with and without a Kahook Dual Blade in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:11–17. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S282440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEcK. Phacoemulsification, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation, & dual blade Ab-interno trabeculectomy; 2020. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHJpGjc5wsA. Accessed April 18, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Gedde SJ, Vinod K, Wright MM, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma preferred practice pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(1):P71–P150. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho D, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA. MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw. 2011;42(1):1–28. doi:10.18637/jss.v042.i08
   Google Scholar
• Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67(1):1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzmaurice GM. Longitudinal Data Analysis. CRC Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Molenberghs G, Verbeke G. Models for Discrete Longitudinal Data. Springer Science & Business Media; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard AE, Ahern J, Fleischer NL, et al. To GEE or not to GEE: comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health. Epidemiol Camb Mass. 2010;21(4):467–474. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181caeb90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassambara A, Kosinski M, Biecek P, Fabian S. Survminer: drawing Survival Curves using “ggplot2.”; 2021. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survminer. Accessed August 23, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto FJ, Coresh J. Adjusting survival curves for confounders: a review and a new method. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143(10):1059–1068. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. Springer Science & Business Media; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Sng CCA, Barton K. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery. Springer Nature; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Shaarawy T, Grehn F, Sherwood M, Ebrary I. WGA Guidelines on Design and Reporting of Glaucoma Surgical Trials. Kugler Publications; 2009.
   Google Scholar