142
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Evaluation of the Efficiency and Safety of a 27-Gauge 20,000 Cuts per Minute Vitreous Cutter

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2037-2043 | Received 10 May 2023, Accepted 23 Jun 2023, Published online: 18 Jul 2023

References

  • Machemer R, Buettner H, Norton EW., et al. Vitrectomy: a pars plana approach. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1971;75:813–820.
  • Eckardt C. Transconjunctival sutureless 23-gauge vitrectomy. Retina. 2005;25:208–211. doi:10.1097/00006982-200502000-00015
  • Fujii GY, De Juan E, Humayun MS, et al. Initial experience using the transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy system for vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1814–1820. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01119-3
  • Fujii GY, De Juan E, Humayun MS, et al. A new 25-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1807–1812. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01179-X
  • Rizzo S, Genovesi-Ebert F, Murri S, et al. 25-gauge, sutureless vitrectomy and standard 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative pilot study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:472–479. doi:10.1007/s00417-005-0173-6
  • Inoue Y, Kadonosono K, Yamakawa T, et al. Surgically- induced inflammation with 20-, 23-, and 25-gauge vitrectomy systems. Retina. 2009;29:477–480. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e31819a6004
  • Kadonosono K, Yamakawa T, Uchio E, et al. Comparison of visual function after epiretinal membrane removal by 20-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:513–515. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.03.060
  • Sandali O, El Sanharawi M, Lecuen N, et al. 25-, 23-, and 20-gauge vitrectomy in epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative study of 553 cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:1811–1819. doi:10.1007/s00417-011-1752-3
  • Oshima Y, Wakabayashi T, Sato T, et al. A 27-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless microincision vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:93–102. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.043
  • Ma J, Wang Q, Niu H. Comparison of 27-gauge and 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery for the treatment of vitreoretinal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:6149692. doi:10.1155/2020/6149692
  • Inoue M, Koto T, Hirakata A. Comparisons of flow dynamics of dual-blade to single-blade beveled-tip vitreous cutters. Ophthalmic Res. 2022;65:216–228. doi:10.1159/000521468
  • Lubiński W, Gosławski W, Podborączyńska–Jodko K, et al. Comparison of 27-gauge versus 25-gauge vitrectomy results in patients with epiretinal membrane: 6-month follow-up. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40:867–875. doi:10.1007/s10792-019-01250-1
  • Nepita I, Repetto R, Dodero A, et al. Experimental assessment of the performance of vitreous cutters with fluids with different rheological properties. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259(5):1113–1121. doi:10.1007/s00417-020-05061-4
  • Inoue M, Koto T, Hirakata A. Flow dynamics of beveled-tip and flat-tip vitreous cutters. Retina. 2021;41:445–453. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002811
  • Tabandeh H, Sullivan PM, Smahliuk P, Flynn HW, Schiffman J. Suprachoroidal hemorrhage during pars plana vitrectomy. Risk factors and outcomes. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(2):236–242. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90062-3
  • Khan MA, Shahlaee A, Toussaint B, et al. Outcomes of 27 augemicroincision vitrectomy surgery for posterior segment disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;161:36–43. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2015.09.024
  • Watanabe A, Tsuzuki A, Arai K, Gekka T, Tsuneoka H. Treatment of dropped nucleus with a 27-gauge twin duty cycle vitreous cutter. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2016;7(1):44–48. doi:10.1159/000443721
  • Rizzo S, Barca F, Caporossi T, Mariotti C. Twenty-seven–gauge vitrectomy for various vitreoretinal diseases. Retina. 2015;35(6):1273–1278. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000545
  • Mitsui K, Kogo J, Takeda H, et al. Comparative study of 27-gauge vs 25- gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane. Eye. 2016;30(4):538–544. doi:10.1038/eye.2015.275