Ex-PRESS Implantation versus Trabeculectomy for Long-Term Maintenance in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma

References

• Borisuth NS, Phillips B, Krupin T. The risk profile of glaucoma filtration surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1999;10(2):112–116. doi:10.1097/00055735-199904000-00006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sugimoto Y, Mochizuki H, Ohkubo S, Higashide T, Sugiyama K, Kiuchi Y. Intraocular pressure outcomes and risk factors for failure in the collaborative bleb-related infection incidence and treatment study. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(11):2223–2233. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong L, Lafuma A, Aguadé AS, Berdeaux G. Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:527–533. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S18565
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gonzalez-Rodriguez JM, Trope GE, Drori-Wagschal L, Jinapriya D, Buys YM. Comparison of trabeculectomy versus Ex-PRESS: 3-year follow-up. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(9):1269–1273. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagschal LD, Trope GE, Jinapriya D, Jin YP, Buys YM. Prospective randomized study comparing Ex-PRESS to trabeculectomy: 1-year Results. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(8):624–629. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Moraes CG, Liebmann JM, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Management of advanced glaucoma: characterization and monitoring. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016;61(5):597–615. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2016.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters D, Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Factors associated with lifetime risk of open-angle glaucoma blindness. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92(5):421–425. doi:10.1111/aos.12203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(4):429–440. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00538-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husain R, Clarke JCK, Seah SKL, Khaw PT. A review of trabeculectomy in East Asian people--the influence of race. Eye. 2005;19(3):243–252. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1641–1648. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaarawy T, Sherwood M, Grehn F. Guidelines on Design and Reporting of Glaucoma Surgical Trials. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Gedde SJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC. Surgical complications in the tube versus trabeculectomy study during the first year of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(1):23–31. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuasa Y, Sugimoto Y, Hirooka K, et al. Effectiveness of trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C for glaucomatous eyes with low intraocular pressure on treatment eye drops. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98(1):e81–e87. doi:10.1111/aos.14195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz SK, Iverson SM, Shi W, Greenfield DS. Safety and efficacy of achieving single-digit intraocular pressure targets with filtration surgery in eyes with progressive normal-tension glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(2):217–222. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moisseiev E, Zunz E, Tzur R, Kurtz S, Shemesh G. Standard trabeculectomy and ex-press miniature glaucoma shunt: a comparative study and literature review. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(6):410–416. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arimura S, Miyake S, Iwasaki K, et al. Randomised clinical trial for postoperative complications after EX-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy with 2-year follow-up. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16168. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34627-w
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Netland PA, Sarkisian SR, Moster MR, et al. Randomized, prospective, comparative trial of EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device versus trabeculectomy (XVT study). Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(2):433–440.e3. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahan E, Ben Simon GJ, Lafuma A. Comparison of trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS implantation in fellow eyes of the same patient: a prospective, randomised study. Eye. 2012;26(5):703–710. doi:10.1038/eye.2012.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto Y, Michihata N, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H, Aihara M. Reoperation rates after Ex-PRESS versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle or normal-tension glaucoma: a national database study in Japan. Eye. 2020;34(6):1069–1076. doi:10.1038/s41433-019-0641-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltran-Agullo L, Trope GE, Jin Y, Wagschal LD, Jinapriya D, Buys YM. Comparison of visual recovery following ex-press versus trabeculectomy: results of a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(3):181–186. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829e1b68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawa M. Laser flare-cell photometer: principle and significance in clinical and basic ophthalmology. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2017;61(1):21–42. doi:10.1007/s10384-016-0488-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishida K, Moroto N, Murata K, Yamamoto T. Effect of glaucoma implant surgery on intraocular pressure reduction, flare count, anterior chamber depth, and corneal endothelium in primary open-angle glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2017;61(4):334–346. doi:10.1007/s10384-017-0512-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inatani M, Ogata-Iwao M, Takihara Y, et al. A prospective study of postoperative aqueous flare in trabeculectomy alone versus phacotrabeculectomy. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2012;116(9):856–861.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang W, Zhang X. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing EX-PRESS implantation with trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e100578. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto M, Matsumoto Y, Mori S, et al. Excessive scleral shrinkage, rather than choroidal thickening, is a major contributor to the development of hypotony maculopathy after trabeculectomy. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0191862. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issa de Fendi L, Cena de Oliveira T, Bigheti Pereira C, Pereira Bigheti C, Viani GA. Additive effect of risk factors for trabeculectomy failure in glaucoma patients: a risk-group from a cohort study. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(10):e879–e883. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landers J, Martin K, Sarkies N, Bourne R, Watson P. A twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: risk factors and outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(4):694–702. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood MB, Grierson I, Millar L, Hitchings RA. Long-term morphologic effects of antiglaucoma drugs on the conjunctiva and Tenon’s capsule in glaucomatous patients. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(3):327–335. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(89)32888-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadway DC, Grierson I, Hitchings RA. Local effects of previous conjunctival incisional surgery and the subsequent outcome of filtration surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(6):805–818. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00045-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar