Corneal Outcomes Following Cataract Surgery Using Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices Composed of Chondroitin Sulfate-Hyaluronic Acid: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

References

• Meek KM, Knupp C. Corneal structure and transparency. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015;49:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuft SJ, Coster DJ. The corneal endothelium. Eye. 1990;4(Pt 3):389–424. doi:10.1038/eye.1990.53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ventura AC, Wälti R, Böhnke M. Corneal thickness and endothelial density before and after cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(1):18–20. doi:10.1136/bjo.85.1.18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feizi S. Corneal endothelial cell dysfunction: etiologies and management. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2018;10:2515841418815802. doi:10.1177/2515841418815802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho JW, Afshari NA. Advances in cataract surgery: preserving the corneal endothelium. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26(1):22–27. doi:10.1097/icu.0000000000000121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mencucci R, Ponchietti C, Virgili G, Giansanti F, Menchini U. Corneal endothelial damage after cataract surgery: microincision versus standard technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(8):1351–1354. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien PD, Fitzpatrick P, Kilmartin DJ, Beatty S. Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification surgery by a junior resident. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(4):839–843. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00648-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki T, Kitazawa K, Inatomi T, et al. Risk Factors for Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss in Patients with Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7260. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64126-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamdad S, Bolkheir A, Sedaghat MR, Motamed M. Changes in corneal thickness and corneal endothelial cell density after phacoemulsification cataract surgery: a double-blind randomized trial. Electron Physician. 2018;10(4):6616–6623. doi:10.19082/6616
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arshinoff SA, Hofman I. Prospective, randomized trial comparing Micro Visc Plus and Healon GV in routine phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24(6):814–820. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80137-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvankar-Mehta MS, Fu A, Subramanian Y, Hutnik C. Impact of Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices in Cataract Surgery. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:7801093. doi:10.1155/2020/7801093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bruel A, Gailly J, Devriese S, Welton NJ, Shortt AJ, Vrijens F. The protective effect of ophthalmic viscoelastic devices on endothelial cell loss during cataract surgery: a meta-analysis using mixed treatment comparisons. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(1):5–10. doi:10.1136/bjo.2009.158360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshinoff SA, Albiani DA, Taylor-Laporte J. Intraocular pressure after bilateral cataract surgery using Healon, Healon5, and Healon GV. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(4):617–625. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01262-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis EA, Lindstrom RL. Corneal thickness and visual acuity after phacoemulsification with 3 viscoelastic materials. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(10):1505–1509. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00436-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer MP, Tetz MR, Auffarth GU, Welt R, Völcker HE. Effect of Healon5 and 4 other viscoelastic substances on intraocular pressure and endothelium after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(2):213–218. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00568-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshinoff SA, Jafari M. New classification of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices--2005. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(11):2167–2171. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.08.056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshinoff SA. Dispersive-cohesive viscoelastic soft shell technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(2):167–173. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(99)80121-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkenstein AF, Borkenstein EM, Malyugin B. Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices (OVDs) in Challenging Cases: a Review. Ophthalmol Ther. 2021;10(4):831–843. doi:10.1007/s40123-021-00403-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tram NK, Swindle-Reilly KE. Rheological Properties and Age-Related Changes of the Human Vitreous Humor. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:199. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2018.00199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Majumdar S, Ma G, et al. Chondroitin Sulfate-Based Biocompatible Crosslinker Restores Corneal Mechanics and Collagen Alignment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(10):3887–3895. doi:10.1167/iovs.16-21292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcon. DuoVisc. Fort Worth, Texas; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Long Y, Zhao X, Liu S, et al. Collagen-Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Membranes for Corneal Regeneration. ACS Omega. 2018;3(1):1269–1275. doi:10.1021/acsomega.7b01511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera UC, Sivakumar RR, Prajna L, Agrawal N, Rajan RP. Epiretinal deposits post cataract extraction. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2013;7(4):359–361. doi:10.1097/ICB.0b013e3182964f91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vallières M, du Souich P. Modulation of inflammation by chondroitin sulfate. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18 Suppl 1:S1–6. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2010.02.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins TJ, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed July 13, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta PK, Berdahl JP, Chan CC, et al. The corneal endothelium: clinical review of endothelial cell health and function. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(9):1218–1226. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg B, Jonsson M, Behndig A. Postoperative corneal swelling correlates strongly to corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139(6):1035–1041. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.12.080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenn O, Dick HB, Krummenauer F, Christmann S, Vogel A, Pfeiffer N. Healon5 versus Viscoat during cataract surgery: intraocular pressure, laser flare and corneal changes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238(10):861–867. doi:10.1007/s004170000192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maár N, Graebe A, Schild G, Stur M, Amon M. Influence of viscoelastic substances used in cataract surgery on corneal metabolism and endothelial morphology: comparison of Healon and Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(11):1756–1761. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00985-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyata K, Nagamoto T, Maruoka S, Tanabe T, Nakahara M, Amano S. Efficacy and safety of the soft-shell technique in cases with a hard lens nucleus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(9):1546–1550. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01323-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss B, Findl O, Menapace R, et al. Corneal endothelial cell protection with a dispersive viscoelastic material and an irrigating solution during phacoemulsification: low-cost versus expensive combination. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(4):733–740. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01745-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yachimori R, Matsuura T, Hayashi K, Hayashi H. Increased intraocular pressure and corneal endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2004;35(6):453–459.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perone JM, Popovici A, Ouled-Moussa R, Herasymyuk O, Reynders S. Safety and efficacy of two ocular anesthetic methods for phacoemulsification: topical anesthesia and viscoanesthesia (VisThesia). Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17(2):171–177. doi:10.1177/112067210701700204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarnawska D, Wylegała E. Effectiveness of the soft-shell technique in patients with Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(11):1907–1912. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.06.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshika T, Bissen-Miyajima H, Fujita Y, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of DisCoVisc and Healon5 in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Eye. 2010;24(8):1376–1381. doi:10.1038/eye.2010.47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modi SS, Davison JA, Walters T. Safety, efficacy, and intraoperative characteristics of DisCoVisc and Healon ophthalmic viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:1381–1389. doi:10.2147/opth.S22243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moschos MM, Chatziralli IP, Sergentanis TN. Viscoat versus Visthesia during phacoemulsification cataract surgery: corneal and foveal changes. BMC Ophthalmol. 2011;11:9. doi:10.1186/1471-2415-11-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espíndola RF, Castro EF, Santhiago MR, Kara-Junior N. A clinical comparison between DisCoVisc and 2% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose in phacoemulsification: a fellow eye study. Clinics. 2012;67(9):1059–1062. doi:10.6061/clinics/2012(09)13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auffarth GU, Auerbach FN, Rabsilber T, et al. Comparison of the performance and safety of 2 ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(1):87–94. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.10.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshinoff SA, Norman R. Tri-soft shell technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(8):1196–1203. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang HB, Lyu B, Yim HB, Lee NY. Endothelial Cell Loss after Phacoemulsification according to Different Anterior Chamber Depths. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:210716. doi:10.1155/2015/210716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pricopie S, Istrate S, Voinea L, Leasu C, Paun V, Radu C. Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Rom J Ophthalmol. 2017;61(2):90–94. doi:10.22336/rjo.2017.17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price MO, Mehta JS, Jurkunas UV, Price FW. Corneal endothelial dysfunction: evolving understanding and treatment options. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;82:100904. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin Group I. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Corneal Transplant: final Report. Prepared for Eye Bank Association of America; 2013. Available from: http://www.lewin.com/content/dam/Lewin/Resources/Site_Sections/Publications/EBAARpt.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon HA, Chalk D, Stein K, Frost NA. Cost effectiveness of collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus in the UK NHS. Eye. 2015;29(11):1504–1511. doi:10.1038/eye.2015.151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong KL, Nguyen HV, Cajucom-Uy HY, et al. Cost Minimization Analysis of Precut Cornea Grafts in Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty. Medicine. 2016;95(8):e2887. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000002887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gain P, Jullienne R, He Z, et al. Global Survey of Corneal Transplantation and Eye Banking. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(2):167–173. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar