Advanced search
Publication Cover
Clinical Ophthalmology Volume 17, 2023 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
314
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Visual Outcomes, Quality of Vision, Patient Satisfaction and Spectacle Independence After Bilateral Implantation of the Synergy™ Intraocular Lens

Joaquin O De Rojas1 Center for Sight/US Eye, Sarasota, FL, USACorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Helga P Sandoval2 Carolina Eyecare Physicians/US Eye, Mt. Pleasant, SC, USAView further author information
,
Richard Potvin3 Science in Vision, Bend, OR, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0964-5035View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Kerry D Solomon2 Carolina Eyecare Physicians/US Eye, Mt. Pleasant, SC, USAView further author information
Pages 2277-2285 | Received 13 May 2023, Accepted 26 Jun 2023, Published online: 09 Aug 2023

References

  • de Silva SR, Evans JR, Kirthi V, Ziaei M, Leyland M. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12(12):CD003169. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub4
  • Steinmüller LN, Greve D, Rua Amaro D, Bertelmann E, von Sonnleithner C. Analysis of higher-order aberrations in relation to the clinical outcome of an enhanced monofocal IOL. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022;11206721221134171. doi:10.1177/11206721221134171
  • Garzón N, Poyales F, Albarrán-Diego C, Rico-Del-Viejo L, Pérez-Sanz L, García-Montero M. Visual and optical quality of enhanced intermediate monofocal versus standard monofocal intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260:3617–3625. doi:10.1007/s00417-022-05700-y
  • Wan KH, Au ACK, Kua WN, et al. Enhanced monofocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens in cataract surgery: a meta-analysis. J Refract Surg. 2022;38:538–546. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20220707-01
  • Kohnen T, Petermann K, Böhm M, et al. Nondiffractive wavefront-shaping extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens: visual performance and patient-reported outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48:144–150. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000826
  • Ruiz-Mesa R, Blanch-Ruiz J, Ruiz-Santos M, Montés-Micó R. Optical and visual quality assessment of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens based on spherical aberration of different sign. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41:1019–1032. doi:10.1007/s10792-020-01659-z
  • Sakisaka T, Minami K, Takada K, Mori Y, Miyata K. Functional visual acuity after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using an echelett optics. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021;21(1):418. doi:10.1186/s12886-021-02189-7
  • Rodov L, Reitblat O, Levy A, Assia EI, Kleinmann G. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction for trifocal, extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2019;35:434–440. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190618-01
  • Cho JY, Won YK, Park J, et al. Visual outcomes and optical quality of accommodative, multifocal, extended depth-of-focus, and monofocal intraocular lenses in presbyopia-correcting cataract surgery: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022;140:1045–1053. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.3667
  • Johnson & Johnson Vision. TECNIS Synergy IOL with TECNIS Simplicity Delivery System. 05/2021. Santa Ana, CA: Johnson & Johnson Vision; 2021.
  • Nakano S, Miyata A, Kizawa J, Kurosaka D, Miyata K, Oshika T. Blue light-filtering and violet light-filtering hydrophobic acrylic foldable intraocular lenses: intraindividual comparison. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45:1393–1397. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.05.027
  • Shin DE, Lee H, Koh K. Comparative analysis of a presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens that combines extended depth-of-focus and bifocal profiles with a standard monofocal intraocular lens. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22:302. doi:10.1186/s12886-022-02516-6
  • Ribeiro FJ, Ferreira TB, Silva D, Matos AC, Gaspar S. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantation of a presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens that combines extended depth-of-focus and multifocal profiles. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47:1448–1453. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000659
  • Ozturkmen C, Kesim C, Karadeniz PG, Sahin A. Visual acuity, defocus curve and patient satisfaction of a new hybrid EDOF-multifocal diffractive intraocular lens. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022;32:2988–2993. doi:10.1177/11206721211057338
  • Fernández J, Ribeiro FJ, Rodríguez-Vallejo M. Standard for collecting and reporting outcomes of IOL–based refractive surgery: update for enhanced monofocal, EDOF, and multifocal IOLs. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(11):1235–1241. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001013
  • Dick HB, Ang RE, Corbett D, et al. Comparison of 3-month visual outcomes of a new multifocal intraocular lens vs a trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(11):1270–1276. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000971
  • Benyoussef AA, Reboux N, Cochener B. Comparison of bilateral reading performance among two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2022;38:428–434. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20220516-02
  • Gabrić N, Gabrić I, Gabrić K, Biščević A, Piñero DP, Bohač M. Clinical outcomes with a new continuous range of vision presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2021;37:256–262. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20210209-01
  • Ferreira TB, Ribeiro FJ, Silva D, Matos AC, Gaspar S, Almeida S. Comparison of refractive and visual outcomes of 3 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48:280–287. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000743

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.