Comparing Predictive Accuracy of a Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer

References

• Vogel A, Dick BH, Krummenauer F. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1961–1968. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01214-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G, Huang J. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:62–67. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes-Mico R, Pastor-Pascual F, Ruiz-Mesa R, Tana-Rivero P. Ocular biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47:802–814. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CM, Lim DH, Kim HJ, Chung TY. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0223114. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:644–648. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes-Mico R. Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48:16–25. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitblat O, Levy A, Kleinmann G, Assia EI. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using three optical biometry measurement devices: the OA-2000, Lenstar-LS900 and IOLMaster-500. Eye. 2018;32:1244–1252. doi:10.1038/s41433-018-0063-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty N, Kaweri L, Koshy A, Shetty R, Nuijts RM, Sinha Roy A. Repeatability of biometry measured by three devices and its impact on predicted intraocular lens power. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47:585–592. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shammas HJ, Ortiz S, Shammas MC, Kim SH, Chong C. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:50–61. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasavada SA, Patel P, Vaishnav VR, et al. Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and swept-source OCT-based biometry devices in dense cataracts. J Refract Surg. 2020;36:557–564. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20200612-03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Chen M, Ning R, et al. The precision of a new anterior segment optical coherence tomographer and its comparison with a swept-source OCT-based optical biometer in patients with cataract. J Refract Surg. 2021;37:616–622. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20210610-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omoto MK, Torii H, Masui S, Ayaki M, Tsubota K, Negishi K. Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices. Sci Rep. 2019;9:6557. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42968-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauvin M, Wallerstein A. AstigMATIC: an automatic tool for standard astigmatism vector analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18:255. doi:10.1186/s12886-018-0920-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom M, Dickman M, Henry Y, et al. Risk factors for refractive error after cataract surgery: analysis of 282,811 cataract extractions reported to the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for cataract and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:447–452. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings AB, Naughton S, Coen AM, Brennan E, Kelly GE. Comparative analysis of swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry biometers in the prediction of cataract surgery refractive outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:4209–4220. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S278589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabian E, Wehner W. Prediction accuracy of total keratometry compared to standard keratometry using different intraocular lens power formulas. J Refract Surg. 2019;35:362–368. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190422-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamaoki A, Kojima T, Hasegawa A, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new swept-source optical coherence biometer that uses individual refractive indices to measure axial length in cataract patients. Ophthalmic Res. 2019;62:11–23. doi:10.1159/000496690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JY, Choi A, Kwon H, Jeon S. Accuracy of IOL power calculation formulas for quadrifocal acrysof IQ PanOptix TFNT implantation in patients with previous corneal refractive surgery: comparison of SS-OCT-based biometers. J Refract Surg. 2021;37:836–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitblat O, Assia EI, Kleinmann G, Levy A, Barrett GD, Abulafia A. Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;43:328–334. doi:10.1111/ceo.12478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song JS, Yoon DY, Hyon JY, Jeon HS. Comparison of ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using IOL Master 500, IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS900. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020;34:126–132. doi:10.3341/kjo.2019.0102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehmann RP, Houtman DM. Visual performance in cataract patients with low levels of postoperative astigmatism: full correction versus spherical equivalent correction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:333–338. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S28241
   PubMedGoogle Scholar