180
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Clinical Evaluation of a Hydrophobic Intraocular Lens Using a Preloaded Automated Injector in a Korean Population

, ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 3353-3363 | Received 16 Jun 2023, Accepted 09 Oct 2023, Published online: 02 Nov 2023

References

  • Grzybowski A. Recent developments in cataract surgery. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(22):1540. doi:10.21037/atm-2020-rcs-16
  • Mencucci R, Cennamo M, Venturi D, Vignapiano R, Favuzza E. Visual outcome, optical quality, and patient satisfaction with a new monofocal IOL, enhanced for intermediate vision: preliminary results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(3):378–387. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000061
  • de Silva SR, Evans JR, Kirthi V, Ziaei M, Leyland M. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:CD003169. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub4
  • Oshika T, Sasaki N, Clinical Study Group on New Intraocular Lens and Delivery System. One-year multicenter evaluation of a new hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens with hydroxyethyl methacrylate in an automated preloaded delivery system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(3):275–279. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000746
  • Lehmann R, Maxwell A, Lubeck DM, Fong R, Walters TR, Fakadej A. Effectiveness and safety of the Clareon monofocal intraocular lens: outcomes from a 12-month single-arm clinical study in a large sample. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:1647–1657. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S295008
  • Werner L, Thatthamla I, Ong M, et al. Evaluation of clarity characteristics in a new hydrophobic acrylic IOL in comparison to commercially available IOLs. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(10):1490–1497. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.05.017
  • Miyata A, Uchida N, Nakajima K, Yaguchi S. Clinical and experimental observation of glistening in acrylic intraocular lenses. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2001;45(6):564–569. doi:10.1016/s0021-5155(01)00429-4
  • Titiyal JS, Basak SK, Shetty N, et al. Twelve-months follow-up postmarket study of a hydrophobic intraocular lens using a preloaded automated injector in an Indian population. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:4215–4225. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S379054
  • Mendicute J, Bascaran L, Pablo L, et al. Multicenter evaluation of time, operational, and economic efficiencies of a new preloaded intraocular lens delivery system versus manual intraocular lens delivery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:591–599. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S263658
  • Wang L, Wolfe P, Chernosky A, Paliwal S, Tjia K, Lane S. In vitro delivery performance assessment of a new preloaded intraocular lens delivery system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(12):1814–1820. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.10.014
  • Jones JJ, Chu J, Graham J, Zaluski S, Rocha G. The impact of a preloaded intraocular lens delivery system on operating room efficiency in routine cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1123–1129. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S107726
  • Black D, Corbett D, Roberts TV, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel preloaded intraocular lens delivery system during routine cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:2291–2300. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S260925
  • Wu Y, Yan H, Yan W. Preloaded vs manually loaded IOL delivery systems in cataract surgery in the largest ambulatory surgery center of northwestern China: an efficiency analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):469. doi:10.1186/s12886-020-01721-5
  • Nanavaty MA, Kubrak-Kisza M. Evaluation of preloaded intraocular lens injection systems: ex vivo study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(4):558–563. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.02.019
  • Mastropasqua L, Toto L, D’Ugo E, et al. In vivo and in vitro results of an automated preloaded delivery system for IOL implantation in cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40(1):125–134. doi:10.1007/s10792-019-01154-0
  • Dada T, Muralidhar R. Insertion of the Sensar IOL via the Monarch II delivery system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(9):1684. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.09.008
  • Weston K, Nicholson R, Bunce C, Yang YF. An 8-year retrospective study of cataract surgery and postoperative endophthalmitis: injectable intraocular lenses may reduce the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(10):1377–1380. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306372
  • Chung B, Lee H, Choi M, Seo KY, Kim EK, Kim TI. Preloaded and non-preloaded intraocular lens delivery system and characteristics: human and porcine eyes trial. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(1):6–11. doi:10.18240/ijo.2018.01.02
  • Khoramnia R, Yildirim TM, Weindler J, Naujokaitis T, Dzhambazova M, Auffarth GU. Preloaded injectors used in a clinical study: videographic assessment and laboratory analysis of injector nozzle damage. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(10):1338–1344. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000587
  • Negishi K, Masui S, Torii H, Nishi Y, Tsubota K. Refractive stability of a new single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens and corneal wound repair after implantation using a new automated intraocular lens delivery system. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0238366. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238366
  • Liu J, Wolfe P, Hernandez V, Kohnen T. Comparative assessment of the corneal incision enlargement of 4 preloaded IOL delivery systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(7):1041–1046. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000214
  • Cennamo M, Favuzza E, Salvatici MC, Giuranno G, Buzzi M, Mencucci R. Effect of manual, preloaded, and automated preloaded injectors on corneal incision architecture after IOL implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(10):1374–1380. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000295
  • Fang H, Zhang L, Schickhardt S, et al. A laboratory evaluation of nozzle tip damage in four generations of intraocular lens injector systems using a self-developed damage scale. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):2723. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06696-5
  • Bedar MS, Kellner U. Clinical experience with the Clareon® IOL and the AutonoMe® implantation system. Ophthalmologe. 2020;117(11):1100–1104. doi:10.1007/s00347-020-01075-9
  • Stanojcic N, O’Brart D, Hull C, et al. Visual and refractive outcomes and glistenings occurrence after implantation of 2 monofocal, aspheric, hydrophobic acrylic IOLs. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(7):986–994. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000201
  • Oshika T, Fujita Y, Inamura M, Miyata K. Mid-term and long-term clinical assessments of a new 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL with hydroxyethyl methacrylate. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(5):682–687. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000142
  • Chung JK, Lee HK, Kim MK, et al. Cataract surgery practices in the Republic of Korea: a survey of the Korean Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2018. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2019;33(5):451–457. doi:10.3341/kjo.2019.0064
  • Rho CR, Kim JH, Chung IK, et al. Cataract surgery practice in the Republic of Korea: a survey of the Korean Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2020. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2021;35(4):272–279. doi:10.3341/kjo.2020.0001
  • Masket S, Wang L, Belani S. Induced astigmatism with 2.2- and 3.0-mm coaxial phacoemulsification incisions. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(1):21–24. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20090101-04
  • Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Hayashi H. Postoperative corneal shape changes: microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(2):233–239. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.031
  • Yildirim TM, Labuz G, Baur ID, et al. Corneal incision enlargement in two preloaded intraocular lens injectors: an intraindividual in vivo study. J Refract Surg. 2021;37(5):331–336. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20210204-01