Advanced search
Publication Cover
Clinical Ophthalmology Volume 17, 2023 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
178
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Influence of Preoperative Parameters on the Ratio of Keratometric Change per Diopter of Attempted Spherical Equivalent (∆K/∆SEQ) for Myopic Correction Within LASIK, PRK, and SMILE

Majid Moshirfar1 Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA;2 John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA;3 Utah Lions Eye Bank, Murray, UT, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1024-6250
ORCID Icon,
Joshua S Theis4 University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
,
David S Cha5 Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
,
Kaiden B Porter4 University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
,
Carter J Payne1 Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA;6 Department of Ophthalmology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-7033
ORCID Icon &
Phillip C Hoopes1 Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2567-8331
ORCID Icon
Pages 2563-2573 | Received 15 Jun 2023, Accepted 21 Aug 2023, Published online: 29 Aug 2023

References

  • Calculation for LASIK ablation – eyeWiki; n.d. Available from: https://eyewiki.aao.org/Calculation_for_LASIK_Ablation. Accessed April 28, 2023.
  • Moshirfar M, Christiansen SM, Kim G. Comparison of the ratio of keratometric change to refractive change induced by myopic ablation. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(10):675–682. PMID: 23061996. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20120921-01
  • Yang SH, Van Gelder RN, Pepose JS. Neural network computer program to determine photorefractive keratectomy nomograms. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24(7):917–924. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80043-6
  • Arba Mosquera S, de Ortueta D, Verma S. The art of nomograms. Eye Vis. 2018;5(1):1–13. doi:10.1186/S40662-018-0096-Z/TABLES/3
  • Lee WS, Manche EE. Comparison of simulated keratometric changes following wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:613–619. PMID: 29636597; PMCID: PMC5880184. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S161387
  • Moshirfar M, Brown TW, Heiland MB, Rosen DB, Ronquillo YC, Hoopes PC. Comparative analysis of LASIK flap diameter and its centration using two different femtosecond lasers. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2019;8(3):241–249.
  • Mifflin MD, Betts BS, Frederick PA, et al. Efficacy and safety of a 3-month loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel taper for routine prophylaxis after photorefractive keratectomy compared to a 3-month prednisolone acetate 1% and fluorometholone 0.1% taper. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1113–1118. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S138272
  • Payne CJ, Webster CR, Moshirfar M, Handlon JJ, Ronquillo YC, Hoopes PC. One-year visual outcomes and corneal higher-order aberration assessment of small-incision lenticule extraction for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. J Clin Med. 2022;11(21):6294. doi:10.3390/jcm11216294
  • Guo H, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Hodge W. Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1). doi:10.1186/S12886-019-1165-3
  • Ivarsen A, Fledelius W, Hjortdal JØ. Three-year changes in epithelial and stromal thickness after PRK or LASIK for high myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(5):2061–2066. PMID: 19151379. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2853
  • Mohamed Mostafa E. Effect of flat cornea on visual outcome after LASIK. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:1–7. doi:10.1155/2015/794854
  • Ghanem RC, de la Cruz J, Tobaigy FM, Ang LPK, Azar DT. LASIK in the presbyopic age group: safety, efficacy, and predictability in 40- to 69-year-old patients. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(7):1303–1310. doi:10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2006.10.026
  • Xin Y, Lopes BT, Wang J, et al. Biomechanical Effects of tPRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE on the Cornea. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:834270. PMID: 35433653; PMCID: PMC9009506. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.834270
  • Zhang H, Xu L, Chen C, et al. Central corneal thickness in adult Chinese. Association with ocular and general parameters. The Beijing Eye Study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246:587–592. doi:10.1007/s00417-007-0760-9
  • Almazrou AA, Abualnaja WA, Abualnaja AA, Alkhars AZ. Central corneal thickness of a Saudi population in relation to age, gender, refractive errors, and corneal curvature. Cureus. 2022;14(10). doi:10.7759/CUREUS.30441
  • Valdez-García JE, Hernandez-Camarena JC, Lozano-Ramírez JF, Zavala J, Loya-García D, Merayo-Lloves J. Correlation of age, corneal curvature and spherical equivalent with central corneal thickness. Rev Mex de Oftalmol. 2017;91(4):172–176. doi:10.1016/J.MEXOFT.2016.05.005
  • Chow SSW, Chow LLW, Lee CZ, Chan TCY. Astigmatism correction using SMILE. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2019;8(5):391–396. doi:10.1097/01.APO.0000580140.74826.F5
  • Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Correction of myopic astigmatism with small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(4):240–247. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20140320-02

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.