IRIS^® Registry (Intelligent Research In Sight) Analysis of the Incidence of Monovision in Cataract Patients with Bilateral Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation

References

• Fricke TR, Tahhan N, Resnikoff S, et al. Global prevalence of presbyopia and vision impairment from uncorrected presbyopia: systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(10):1492–1499. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden BA, Fricke TR, Ho SM, et al. Global vision impairment due to uncorrected presbyopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(12):1731–1739. doi:10.1001/archopht.126.12.1731
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frick KD, Joy SM, Wilson DA, Naidoo KS, Holden BA. The global burden of potential productivity loss from uncorrected presbyopia. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(8):1706–1710. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy PA, Congdon N, MacKenzie G, et al. Effect of providing near glasses on productivity among rural Indian tea workers with presbyopia (PROSPER): a randomised trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(9):e1019–e1027. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30329-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertz AD, Stewart WC, Burns WR, Stewart JA, Nelson LA. Review of the impact of presbyopia on quality of life in the developing and developed world. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92(6):497–500. doi:10.1111/aos.12308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN. Presbyopia: effectiveness of correction strategies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;68:124–143. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stival LR, Figueiredo MN, Santhiago MR. Presbyopic excimer laser ablation: a review. J Refract Surg. 2018;34(10):698–710. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20180726-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahrous A, Ciralsky JB, Lai EC. Revisiting monovision for presbyopia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29(4):313–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labiris G, Toli A, Perente A, Ntonti P, Kozobolis VP. A systematic review of pseudophakic monovision for presbyopia correction. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(6):992–1000. doi:10.18240/ijo.2017.06.24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remon L, Perez-Merino P, Macedo-de-Araujo RJ, Amorim-de-Sousa AI, Gonzalez-Meijome JM. Bifocal and multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia and myopia control. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:8067657. doi:10.1155/2020/8067657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty R, Brar S, Sharma M, Dadachanji Z, Lalgudi VG. PresbyLASIK: a review of PresbyMAX, Supracor, and laser blended vision: principles, planning, and outcomes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(12):2723–2731. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_32_20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilbao-Calabuig R, Llovet-Osuna F. Non-lens-based surgical techniques for presbyopia correction. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2017;92(9):426–435. doi:10.1016/j.oftal.2017.04.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arlt E, Krall E, Moussa S, Grabner G, Dexl A. Implantable inlay devices for presbyopia: the evidence to date. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:129–137. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S57056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilbao-Calabuig R, Gonzalez-Lopez F, Llovet-Rausell A, Ortega-Usobiaga J, Tejerina Fernandez V, Llovet-Osuna F. Lens-based surgical correction of presbyopia. Where are we in 2020? Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2021;96(2):74–88. doi:10.1016/j.oftal.2020.07.012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sieburth R, Chen M. Intraocular lens correction of presbyopia. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2019;9(1):4–17. doi:10.4103/tjo.tjo_136_18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hipsley A, Hall B, Rocha KM. Scleral surgery for the treatment of presbyopia: where are we today? Eye Vis. 2018;5(1):4. doi:10.1186/s40662-018-0098-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montes-Mico R, Charman WN. Pharmacological strategies for presbyopia correction. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(12):803–814. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20191010-04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerner CF, Thrasher BH. Results of monovision correction in bilateral pseudophakes. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1984;10(1):49–50. doi:10.1016/S0146-2776(84)80077-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelava L, Baric H, Busic M, Cima I, Trkulja V. Monovision versus multifocality for presbyopia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Adv Ther. 2017;34(8):1815–1839. doi:10.1007/s12325-017-0579-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstein S, Pineda R. The quest for spectacle Independence: a comparison of multifocal intraocular lens implants and pseudophakic monovision for patients with presbyopia. Semin Ophthalmol. 2017;32(1):111–115. doi:10.1080/08820538.2016.1228400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito M, Shimizu K, Iida Y, Amano R. Five-year clinical study of patients with pseudophakic monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(8):1440–1445. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Academy of Ophthalmology. IRIS Registry Data Analysis. Available from: https://www.aao.org/iris-registry/data-analysis/requirements. Accessed October 14, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao J, Jiang C, Zhang M. Pseudophakic monovision is an important surgical approach to being spectacle-free. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59(6):481–485. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.86318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Society for Cataract and Refractive Surgery. Clinical Trends Survey 2017; 2017. Available from: https://www.eurotimes.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Clinical_Survey_Supplement-2017Results-12pp-final.pdf. Accessed January 13, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. Clinical Survey 2019; 2019. Available from: https://supplements.eyeworld.org/eyeworld-supplements/ascrs-clinical-survey-2019. Accessed January 13, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. Highlights from the 2022 ASCRS Clinical Survey. Available from: https://supplements.eyeworld.org/i/1483249-ascrs-clinical-survey-2022/0?. Accessed August 31, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell WA, Waycaster CR, D’Souza AO, Meissner BL, Hileman K. A United States cost-benefit comparison of an apodized, diffractive, presbyopia-correcting, multifocal intraocular lens and a conventional monofocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(11):1855–1861. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.07.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song X, Liu X, Wang W, et al. Visual outcome and optical quality after implantation of zonal refractive multifocal and extended-range-of-vision IOLs: a prospective comparison. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(4):540–548. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zvornicanin J, Zvornicanin E. Premium intraocular lenses: the past, present and future. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018;30(4):287–296. doi:10.1016/j.joco.2018.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son HS, Kim SH, Auffarth GU, Choi CY. Prospective comparative study of tolerance to refractive errors after implantation of extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lenses with identical aspheric platform in Korean population. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):187. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1193-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodov L, Reitblat O, Levy A, Assia EI, Kleinmann G. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction for trifocal, extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(7):434–440. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190618-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedrotti E, Chierego C, Talli PM, et al. Extended depth of focus versus monofocal IOLs: objective and subjective visual outcomes. J Refract Surg. 2020;36(4):213–222. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20200212-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhard T, Maier P, Bohringer D, et al. Comparison of two depth of focus intraocular lenses with a monofocal lens: a multi-centre randomized trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259(2):431–442. doi:10.1007/s00417-020-04868-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedrotti E, Neri E, Bonacci E, et al. Extended depth of focus versus monofocal IOLs in patients with high myopia: objective and subjective visual outcomes. J Refract Surg. 2022;38(3):158–166. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20211220-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries NE, Nuijts RM. Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: literature review of benefits and side effects. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(2):268–278. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bala C, Poyales F, Guarro M, et al. Multicountry clinical outcomes of a new nondiffractive presbyopia-correcting IOL. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(2):136–143. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe C, Berdahl J, Reiser H, et al. Clinical outcomes in a U.S. registration study of a new EDOF intraocular lens with a nondiffractive design. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(11):1297–1304. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarro M, Sararols L, Londoño GJ, et al. Visual disturbances produced after the implantation of 3 EDOF intraocular lenses vs 1 monofocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(12):1354–1359. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubinski W, Cholewa M, Podboraczynska-Jodko K. Conventional pseudophakic monovision--visual function, patient satisfaction and complications. Klin Oczna. 2013;115(3):189–193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ito M, Shimizu K, Amano R, Handa T. Assessment of visual performance in pseudophakic monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(4):710–714. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum S. Monovision pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(8):1439–1443. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01218-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Manabe S, Hayashi H. Optimal amount of anisometropia for pseudophakic monovision. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(5):332–338. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20100817-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques FF, Sato RM, Chiacchio BB, Marques DM, Barreiro J, Caetano RL. Evaluation of visual performance and patient satisfaction with pseudophakic monovision technique. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(2):164–168. doi:10.1590/S0004-27492009000200006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelrazek Hafez T, Helaly HA. Spectacle Independence and patient satisfaction with pseudophakic mini-monovision using aberration-free intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:2111–2117. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S215229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull AMJ, Hill WE, Barrett GD. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation methods when targeting low myopia in monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(6):862–866. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Sugar A, Arbisser L, Jacobsen G, Artico J. Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision: patient satisfaction, visual function, and spectacle Independence. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(9):1845–1854. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeser K, Hjortdal JO, Harris WF. Pseudophakic monovision: optimal distribution of refractions. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92(3):270–275. doi:10.1111/aos.12148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg DG, Goldberg MH, Shah R, Meagher JN, Ailani H. Pseudophakic mini-monovision: high patient satisfaction, reduced spectacle dependence, and low cost. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(2):293. doi:10.1186/s12886-018-0963-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayashi K, Ogawa S, Manabe S, Yoshimura K. Binocular visual function of modified pseudophakic monovision. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(2):232–240. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.10.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar