Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Diagnosis Using Pattern Electroretinogram Parameters

References

• Shon K, Wollstein G, Schuman JS, Sung KR. Prediction of glaucomatous visual field progression: pointwise analysis. Curr Eye Res. 2014;39(7):705–710. doi:10.3109/02713683.2013.867353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson EC, Morrison JC. Friend or foe? Resolving the impact of glial responses in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(5):341. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31818c6ef6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin Z, Gao Y, Tang Y, Tian X, Zheng Y, Han Q. Aqueous humor cytokine levels are associated with the severity of visual field defects in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023;23(1):1. doi:10.1186/s12886-023-02875-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baniasadi N, Paschalis EI, Haghzadeh M, et al. Patterns of retinal nerve fiber layer loss in different subtypes of open angle glaucoma using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(10):865–872. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onua AA, Awoyesuku EA, Briggs DE. Profile of primary open angle glaucoma patients attending a tertiary health institution in Niger Delta, Nigeria–a case study of 1000 patients. J Dent Med Sci. 2023;22(2):42–49. doi:10.9790/0853-2202024249
   Google Scholar
• Bastola P, Bastola S, Koirala S. Prevalence, types and risk factors of glaucoma among patients attending department of ophthalmology in a tertiary care hospital: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Med Balear. 2023;38(5):84–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapetanakis VV, Chan MP, Foster PJ, Cook DG, Owen CG, Rudnicka AR. Global variations, and time trends in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(1):86–93. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettin P, Di Matteo F. Glaucoma: present challenges and future trends. Ophthalmic Res. 2013;50(4):197–208. doi:10.1159/000348736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA. 2014;311(18):1901–1911. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.3192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreb RN, Khaw PT. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Lancet. 2004;363(9422):1711–1720. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16257-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuz AC, Oyamada MK, Hatanaka M, Monteiro ML. The role of pattern-reversal electroretinography in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014;77:403–410. doi:10.5935/0004-2749.20140101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura LM, Sorokac N, De Los Santos R, Feuer WJ, Porciatti V. The relationship between retinal ganglion cell function and retinal nerve fiber thickness in early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3904–3911. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Mansouri K, Weinreb RN. The structure and function relationship in glaucoma: implications for detection of progression and measurement of rates of change. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(11):6939–6946. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-10345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung KI, Park CK. Detection of functional change in preperimetric and perimetric glaucoma using 10–2 matrix perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;182:35–44. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao HL, Januwada M, Hussain RS, et al. Comparing the structure–function relationship at the macula with standard automated perimetry and microperimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(13):8063–8068. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-17922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung Y, Park HL, Park YR, Park CK. Usefulness of 10–2 matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry for detecting central visual field defects in preperimetric glaucoma patients. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14622. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15329-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jung Y, Park HY, Jeong HJ, Choi SY, Park CK. The ability of 10–2 short-wavelength perimetry in detecting functional loss of the macular area in preperimetric glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(13):7708–7714. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-17819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldebasi YH, Drasdo N, Morgan JE, North RV. S-cone, L + M-cone, and pattern, electroretinograms in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Vision Res. 2004;44:2749–2756. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.06.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach M, Unsoeld AS, Philippin H, et al. Pattern ERG as an early glaucoma indicator in ocular hypertension: a long-term, prospective study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(11):4881–4887. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-0875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood DC, Xu L, Thienprasiddhi P, et al. The pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma patients with confirmed visual field deficits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2411–2418. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-0238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgarello T, Colotto A, Falsini B, et al. Correlation of pattern electroretinogram with optic disc cup shape in ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(9): 1989–1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG. The uniform field and pattern ERG in macaques with experimental glaucoma: removal of spiking activity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(9):2797–2810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirsi A, Orshan D, Wong B, et al. Associations between steady-state pattern electroretinography and estimated retinal ganglion cell count in glaucoma suspects. Doc Ophthalmol. 2022;145(1):11–25. doi:10.1007/s10633-022-09869-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chansangpetch S, Rojanapongpun P, Lin SC. Anterior segment imaging for angle closure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;188:xvi–xxix. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorentini A, Maffei L, Pirchio M, Spinelli D, Porciatti V. The ERG in response to alternating gratings in patients with diseases of the peripheral visual pathway. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;21:490–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeman M, Kestelyn P. Glaucoma, and blood pressure. Hypertension. 2019;73(5):944–950. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgohary AM, Elbedewy HA, Saad HA, Eid TM. Pattern electroretinogram changes in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma in correlation with visual field and optical coherence tomography changes. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020;30(6):1362–1369. doi:10.1177/1120672119872606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode SF, Jehle T, Bach M. Pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma suspects: new findings from a longitudinal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(7):4300–4306. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR, Maumenee AE. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma: II. The site of injury and susceptibility to damage. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99(4):635–649. doi:10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010635009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meredith SP, Swift L, Eke T, Broadway DC. The acute morphologic changes that occur at the optic nerve head induced by medical reduction of intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma. 2007;16(6):556–561. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3180575229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon SJ, Park HY, Jung KI, Park CK. Relationship between pattern electroretinogram and optic disc morphology in glaucoma. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):0220992. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussel II, Wollstein G, Schuman JS. OCT for glaucoma diagnosis, screening, and detection of glaucoma progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(2):15–19. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304326
   Google Scholar
• Moreno PA, Konno B, Lima VC, et al. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for early glaucoma assessment: analysis of macular ganglion cell complex versus peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011;46(6):543–547. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2011.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North RV, Jones AL, Drasdo N, Wild JM, Morgan JE. Electrophysiological evidence of early functional damage in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(2):1216–1222. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-3409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porciatti V, Burr DC, Morrone MC, Fiorentini A. The effects of ageing on the pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential in humans. Vision Res. 1992;32(7):1199–1209. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(92)90214-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvenkel B, Sustar M, Perovšek D. Ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma, as assessed by photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Doc Ophthalmol. 2017;135:17–28. doi:10.1007/s10633-017-9595-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir ST, Oba ME, Erdoğan ET, et al. Comparison of pattern electroretinography and optical coherence tomography parameters in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2015;45(6):229. doi:10.4274/tjo.39260
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bach M, Hoffmann MB. Update on the pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(6):386–395. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318177ebf3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafarzadehpour E, Radinmehr F, Pakravan M, Mirzajani A, Yazdani S. Pattern electroretinography in glaucoma suspects and early primary open angle glaucoma. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2013;8(3):199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parisi V, Miglior S, Manni G, Centofanti M, Bucci MG. Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(2):216–228. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi V, Manni G, Centofanti M, Gandolfi SA, Olzi D, Bucci MG. Correlation between optical coherence tomography, pattern electroretinogram, and visual evoked potentials in open-angle glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(5):905–912. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00644-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowd C, Vizzeri G, Tafreshi A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(3):437–444. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadilla AM, Zaragoza P, Zato MÁ, et al. Pattern electroretinogram and ganglionar cells suffering in ocular hypertensive patients. JSM Ophthalmol. 2016;4(2):1054.
   Google Scholar
• Sponsel WE, Johnson SL, Trevino R, et al. Pattern electroretinography and visual evoked potentials provide clinical evidence of CNS modulation of high- and low-contrast VEP latency in glaucoma. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2017;6(6):6. doi:10.1167/tvst.6.6.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung KI, Jeon S, Shin DY, Lee J, Park CK. Pattern electroretinograms in preperimetric and perimetric glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;215:118–126. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurysheva NI, Maslova EV, Zolnikova IV, Fomin AV, Lagutin MB. A comparative study of structural, functional, and circulatory parameters in glaucoma diagnostics. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0201599. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colotto A, Salgarello T, Giudiceandrea A, et al. Pattern electroretinogram in treated ocular hypertension: a cross-sectional study after timolol maleate therapy. Ophthalmic Res. 1995;27:168–177. doi:10.1159/000267663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura LM, Porciatti V, Ishida K, Feuer WJ, Parrish RK. Pattern electroretinogram abnormality and glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(1):10–19. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura LM, Feuer WJ, Porciatti V. Progressive loss of retinal ganglion cell function is hindered with IOP-lowering treatment in early glaucoma. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:659–663. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar