The Role of Preoperative Case Selection in the Training of Surgical Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

References

• Eckardt C, Eckert T, Eckardt U. 27-gauge Twinlight chandelier illumination system for bimanual transconjunctival vitrectomy. Retina. 2008;28(3):518–519. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181607a0f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshima Y, Awh CC, Tano Y. Self-retaining 27-gauge transconjunctival chandelier endoillumination for panoramic viewing during vitreous surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(1):166–167. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano MR, Cennamo G, Ferrara M, et al. Twenty-Seven-Gauge Versus 25-Gauge Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. Retina. 2017;37(4):637–642. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000001215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltgen N, Heimann H, Hoerauf H, et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR study): risk assessment of anatomical outcome. SPR study report no. 7. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(3):282–287. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02344.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N, et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(12):2142–2154. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimann H, Bornfeld N, Bartz-Schmidt U, et al. Analysis of the surgeon factor in the treatment results of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the “scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study”. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2009;226(12):991–998. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1109873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazinani B, Baumgarten S, Schiller P, et al. Vitrectomy with or without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment: a multi-centre, three-arm, randomised clinical trial. VIPER Study Report No. 1--design and enrolment. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(3):405–410. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller J, Haynes RJ, Sparrow JM. Sequential Hypothesis Testing to Characterise the Learning Curve and Monitor Surgical Performance in Retinal Detachment Surgery. Ophthalmologica. 2016;235(3):157–162. doi:10.1159/000443749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazinani BA, Rajendram A, Walter P, et al. Does surgical experience have an effect on the success of retinal detachment surgery? Retina. 2012;32(1):32–37. doi:10.1097/IAE.0B013E3182411CD2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radeck V, Helbig H, Barth T, et al. The learning curve of retinal detachment surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259(8):2167–2173. doi:10.1007/s00417-021-05096-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugas B, Lafontaine P-O, Guillaubey A, et al. The learning curve for primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for pseudophakic retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247(3):319–324. doi:10.1007/s00417-008-0997-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimel AM, Grand MG, H.w. F Jr. Surgery for retinal detachment: does experience matter? Retina. 2012;32(1):1–3. doi:10.1097/IAE.0B013E3182411D04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echegaray JJ, Vanner EA, Zhang L, et al. Outcomes of Pars Plana Vitrectomy Alone versus Combined Scleral Buckling plus Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Primary Retinal Detachment. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021;5(2):169–175. doi:10.1016/j.oret.2020.09.013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lean JS, Stern WH, Irvine AR, et al. Classification of proliferative vitreoretinopathy used in the silicone study. The Silicone Study Group. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(6):765–771. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(89)32821-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miki D, Hida T, Hotta K, et al. Comparison of scleral buckling and vitrectomy for retinal detachment resulting from flap tears in superior quadrants. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2001;45(2):187–191. doi:10.1016/S0021-5155(00)00377-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshima Y, Yamanishi S, Sawa M, et al. Two-year follow-up study comparing primary vitrectomy with scleral buckling for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000;44(5):538–549. doi:10.1016/S0021-5155(00)00205-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarkar S, Gokhale VV, Raman R, et al. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Retinal Detachment after Pediatric Cataract Surgery. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(1):36–42. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltgen N, Weiss C, Wolf S, et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): recruitment list evaluation. Study report no. 2. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245(6):803–809. doi:10.1007/s00417-006-0399-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez MA, Flynn HW, Smiddy WE, et al. Surgery for retinal detachment in patients with giant retinal tear: etiologies, management strategies, and outcomes. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2013;44(3):232–237. doi:10.3928/23258160-20130503-04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr MR, Obeid A, Ryan EH, et al. RETINAL DETACHMENT WITH INFERIOR RETINAL BREAKS: primary Vitrectomy Versus Vitrectomy With Scleral Buckle (PRO Study Report No. 9). Retina. 2021;41(3):525–530. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter P, Hellmich M, Baumgarten S, et al. Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment: VIPER Study Report No 2-main results. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(6):712–718. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimann H, Zou X, Jandeck C, et al. Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of 512 cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244(1):69–78. doi:10.1007/s00417-005-0026-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziemssen F, Bartz-Schmidt KU. Vitrectomy with or without cerclage in the treatment of retinal detachment. Ophthalmologe. 2004;101(6):554–562. doi:10.1007/s00347-004-1041-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susskind D, Neuhann I, Hilgers R-D, et al. Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in pseudophakic eyes: 20-gauge versus 25-gauge vitrectomy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(8):824–828. doi:10.1111/aos.13133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang CW, TZE-ON CHEUNG B, LAM RF, et al. Primary 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2008;28(8):1075–1081. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e31817b98ba
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakili P, Boden KT, Szurman P, et al. Influence of the scleral indentation technique on the re-detachment rate following retinal detachment surgery. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2022;8(1):12. doi:10.1186/s40942-022-00362-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar