Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Biomechanical Analysis As A Predictor of Glaucoma in Eyes With High Myopia

References

• Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–2090. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):701–713. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.6.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivli A, Koliarakis I, Terzidou C, et al. Normal-tension glaucoma: pathogenesis and genetics. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17(1):563–574. doi:10.3892/etm.2018.7011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strouthidis NG, Girard MJ. Altering the way the optic nerve head responds to intraocular pressure-a potential approach to glaucoma therapy. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2013;13(1):83–89. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2012.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigal IA, Ethier CR. Biomechanics of the optic nerve head. Exp Eye Res. 2009;88(4):799–807. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2009.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts MD, Sigal IA, Liang Y, Burgoyne CF, Downs JC. Changes in the biomechanical response of the optic nerve head in early experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2010;51(11):5675–5684. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts MD, Liang Y, Sigal IA, et al. Correlation between local stress and strain and lamina cribrosa connective tissue volume fraction in normal monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2010;51(1):295–307. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satekenova E, Ko MWL, Kim JR. Investigation of the Optic Nerve Head Morphology Influence to the Optic Nerve Head Biomechanics - Patient Specific Model. Conference proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference; 2019:5370–5373. DOI: 10.1109/embc.2019.8856743.
   Google Scholar
• Ethier CR. Scleral biomechanics and glaucoma--a connection? Can J Ophthalmol. 2006;41(1):9–12. doi:10.1016/s0008-4182(06)80060-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoyne CF, Downs JC, Bellezza AJ, Suh JK, Hart RT. The optic nerve head as a biomechanical structure: a new paradigm for understanding the role of IOP-related stress and strain in the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic nerve head damage. Prog Retinal Eye Res. 2005;24(1):39–73. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard MJ, Suh JK, Bottlang M, Burgoyne CF, Downs JC. Biomechanical changes in the sclera of monkey eyes exposed to chronic IOP elevations. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2011;52(8):5656–5669. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Ren R, Lockwood H, et al. The connective tissue components of optic nerve head cupping in monkey experimental glaucoma part 1: global change. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2015;56(13):7661–7678. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-17624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grytz R, Meschke G, Jonas JB. The collagen fibril architecture in the lamina cribrosa and peripapillary sclera predicted by a computational remodeling approach. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2011;10(3):371–382. doi:10.1007/s10237-010-0240-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmy H, Leila M, Zaki AA. Corneal biomechanics in asymmetrical normal-tension glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:503–510. doi:10.2147/opth.S93725
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jonas JB, Berenshtein E, Holbach L. Lamina cribrosa thickness and spatial relationships between intraocular space and cerebrospinal fluid space in highly myopic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2004;45(8):2660–2665. doi:10.1167/iovs.03-1363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeoung JW, Yang H, Gardiner S, et al. Optical coherence tomography optic nerve head morphology in myopia I: implications of anterior scleral canal opening versus bruch membrane opening offset. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;218:105–119. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomão MQ, Hofling-Lima AL, Faria-Correia F, et al. Dynamic corneal deformation response and integrated corneal tomography. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(3):373–382. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_831_17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joda AA, Shervin MM, Kook D, Elsheikh A. Development and validation of a correction equation for Corvis tonometry. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng. 2016;19(9):943–953. doi:10.1080/10255842.2015.1077515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasy A, Chen KJ, Vinciguerra R, et al. Ex-vivo experimental validation of biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure measurements on human eyes using the CorVis ST. Exp Eye Res. 2018;175:98–102. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2018.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen KJ, Eliasy A, Vinciguerra R, et al. Development and validation of a new intraocular pressure estimate for patients with soft corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(9):1316–1323. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson D, Chauhan B, Johnson C, Katz J, Patella V, Drance S. Criteria for progression of glaucoma in clinical management and in outcome studies. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;130:827–829. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00665-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol. 1975;53(1):34–43. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1975.tb01135.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valbon BF, Ambrósio-Jr. R, Fontes BM, Alves MR. Effects of age on corneal deformation by non-contact tonometry integrated with an ultra-high-speed (UHS) Scheimpflug camera. J Arquivos Brasile de Oftalmol. 2013;76:229–232. doi:10.1590/S0004-27492013000400008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr JB, Zvirgzdina M, Wolffsohn J. The influence of age, ethnicity, eye/body size and diet on corneal biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2017;58(8):1131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asaoka R, Nakakura S, Tabuchi H, et al. The relationship between corvis ST tonometry measured corneal parameters and intraocular pressure, corneal thickness and corneal curvature. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140385–e0140385. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren R, Wang N, Li B, et al. Lamina cribrosa and peripapillary sclera histomorphometry in normal and advanced glaucomatous Chinese eyes with various axial length. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2009;50(5):2175–2184. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura Y, Akagi T, Hangai M, et al. Lamina cribrosa defects and optic disc morphology in primary open angle glaucoma with high myopia. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e115313. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlanetto RL, Park SC, Damle UJ, et al. Posterior displacement of the lamina cribrosa in glaucoma: in vivo interindividual and intereye comparisons. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2013;54(7):4836–4842. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-11530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik S, Pandav SS. Ocular response analyzer. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2012;6(1):17–19. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tubtimthong A, Chansangpetch S, Ratprasatporn N, et al. Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties among axial Myopic, Nonaxial Myopic, and Nonmyopic eyes. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8618615. doi:10.1155/2020/8618615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Li Y, Jin Y, Yang X, Zhao C, Long Q. Corneal biomechanical properties in myopic eyes measured by a dynamic scheimpflug analyzer. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:1–8. doi:10.1155/2015/161869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miki A, Yasukura Y, Weinreb R, et al. Dynamic scheimpflug ocular biomechanical parameters in untreated primary open angle glaucoma eyes. Investigat Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61:19. doi:10.1167/iovs.61.4.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Rehman S, Vallabh NA, et al. Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls. J Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(1):121–126. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomão MQ, Hofling-Lima AL, Gomes Esporcatte LP, et al. The role of corneal biomechanics for the evaluation of ectasia patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6):2113. doi:10.3390/ijerph17062113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jędzierowska M, Koprowski R. Novel dynamic corneal response parameters in a practice use: a critical review. Biomed Eng Online. 2019;18(1):17. doi:10.1186/s12938-019-0636-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valbon BR, Fontes B, Luz A, Roberts C, Alves M, Alves MR. Ocular biomechanical metrics by CorVis ST in healthy Brazilian patients. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:1–6. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20140521-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts C, Mahmoud A, Bons J, et al. Introduction of two novel stiffness parameters and interpretation of air puff–induced biomechanical deformation parameters with a dynamic scheimpflug analyzer. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:266–273. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20161221-03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Ambrósio R, Elsheikh A, et al. Detection of keratoconus with a new biomechanical index. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(12):803–810. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20160629-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasy A, Chen KJ, Vinciguerra R, et al. Determination of corneal biomechanical behavior in-vivo for healthy eyes using CorVis ST tonometry: stress-strain index. Front Bio Biotech. 2019;7:105. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bak-Nielsen S, Pedersen IB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Repeatability, reproducibility, and age dependency of dynamic Scheimpflug-based pneumotonometer and its correlation with a dynamic bidirectional pneumotonometry device. Cornea. 2015;34(1):71–77. doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000000293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth G, Hassan Z, Csutak A, Szalai E, Berta A, Modis L. Repeatability of ocular biomechanical data measurements with a Scheimpflug-based noncontact device on normal corneas. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(8):558–563. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20130719-06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar