150
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CLINICAL TRIAL REPORT

Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes

, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 2815-2824 | Received 09 Aug 2023, Accepted 15 Sep 2023, Published online: 25 Sep 2023

References

  • Manche E, Roe J. Recent advances in wavefront-guided LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29(4):286–291. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000488
  • Tawfik A, Eid AM, Hasanen R, Moftah IA. Q-value customized ablation (custom-Q) versus wavefront optimized ablation for primary myopia and myopic astigmatism. Int Ophthalmol. 2014;34(2):259–262. doi:10.1007/s10792-013-9828-1
  • Myrowitz EH, Chuck RS. A comparison of wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided ablations. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20(4):247–250. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32832a2336
  • Stonecipher KG, Kezirian GM. Wavefront-optimized versus wavefront-guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the ALLEGRETTO WAVE: three-month results of a prospective FDA trial. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(4):S424–30. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20080401-20
  • He L, Liu A, Manche EE. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(6):1170–1178.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.02.037
  • Padmanabhan P, Mrochen M, Basuthkar S, et al. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(3):389–397. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.028
  • Holland S, Lin DT, Tan JC. Topography-guided laser refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24(4):302–309. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283622a59
  • Pasquali T, Krueger R. Topography-guided laser refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23(4):264–268. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e328354adf0
  • Wallerstein A, Gauvin M, Cohen M. Effect of anterior corneal higher-order aberration ablation depth on primary topography-guided LASIK outcomes. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(12):754–762. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20191021-02
  • Kim J, Choi SH, Lim DH, et al. Topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: surgical outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(7):959–965. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.01.031
  • Toda I, Ide T, Fukumoto T, Tsubota K. Visual outcomes after LASIK using topography-guided vs wavefront-guided customized ablation systems. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(11):727–732. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160718-02
  • Schallhorn JM, Seifert S, Schallhorn SC. SMILE, topography-guided LASIK, and wavefront-guided LASIK: review of clinical outcomes in premarket approval FDA studies. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(11):690–698. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190930-02
  • Alpins N. Astigmatism analysis by the Alpins method. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(1):31–49. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00798-7
  • Gauvin M, Wallerstein A. AstigMATIC: an automatic tool for standard astigmatism vector analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):255. doi:10.1186/s12886-018-0920-1
  • Wallerstein A, Gauvin M, Qi SR, et al. Primary topography-guided LASIK: treating manifest refractive astigmatism versus topography-measured anterior corneal astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(1):15–23. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20181113-01
  • Abdelwahab SM, Hamed AM, Bayoumy ASM, Elfayoumi MA. Topography-guided femto-LASIK in virgin eyes: treating manifest versus measured astigmatism. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:4423–4430. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S281736
  • Lobanoff M, Stonecipher K, Tooma T, et al. Clinical outcomes after topography-guided LASIK: comparing results based on a new topography analysis algorithm with those based on manifest refraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(6):814–819. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000176
  • Brunson PB, Mann Ii PM, Mann PM, Potvin R. Clinical outcomes after topography-guided refractive surgery in eyes with myopia and astigmatism - comparing results with new planning software to those obtained using the manifest refraction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:3975–3982. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S280959
  • Stulting RD, Durrie DS, Potvin RJ, et al. Topography-guided refractive astigmatism outcomes: predictions comparing three different programming methods. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:1091–1100. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S244079
  • Finger RP, Scholl HPN, Holz FG. Patient reported outcomes. Relevance and application in ophthalmology. Ophthalmologe. 2008;105(8):722–726. doi:10.1007/s00347-008-1804-1
  • Scheibler F, Finger RP, Grosselfinger R, Dintsios CM. Patient-reported and patient-weighted outcomes in ophthalmology. Ophthalmologe. 2010;107(3):235–240. doi:10.1007/s00347-009-2037-7
  • Hays RD, Tarver ME, Spritzer KL, et al. Assessment of the psychometric properties of a questionnaire assessing patient-reported outcomes with laser in situ keratomileusis (PROWL). JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(1):3–12. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4597
  • Eydelman M, Hilmantel G, Tarver ME, et al. Symptoms and satisfaction of patients in the patient-reported outcomes with laser in situ keratomileusis (PROWL) studies. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(1):13–22. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4587
  • Yu J, Chen H, Wang F. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK with the WaveLight platform. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(5):477–486.
  • Stulting RD, Lobanoff M, Mann PM, et al. Clinical and refractive outcomes after topography-guided refractive surgery planned using Phorcides surgery planning software. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(9):1010–1015. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000910
  • Rush S, Pickett CJ, Rush RB. Patient-reported dry eye outcomes after myopic femtosecond-LASIK: a 6-month prospective analysis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:2141–2147. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S421369
  • Lee MD, Leibold C, Manche EE. Patient-reported outcomes with wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (PROWL) study outcomes from a single institution. J Refract Surg. 2023;39(3):198–204. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20230103-01
  • Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Docket Number: FDA-2022-D-1253; 2022.
  • Toda I. Dry Eye After LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(14):DES109–DES115. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-23538
  • Wallerstein A, Gauvin M. Is Phorcides more likely to give better vision than treating the manifest refraction? J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(10):1451–1452. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000386
  • Yuan Y, Chen Y. Reply: does phorcides software yield inferior topography-guided LASIK accuracy versus targeting the manifest astigmatism? J Refract Surg. 2022;38(11):751. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20221026-02
  • Wallerstein A, Gauvin M. Does phorcides software yield inferior topography-guided LASIK accuracy versus targeting the manifest astigmatism? J Refract Surg. 2022;38(11):750. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20221026-01
  • Wallerstein A, Gauvin M. Comment on: clinical and refractive outcomes after topography-guided refractive surgery planned using Phorcides surgery planning software. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(12):1478–1479. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001068
  • Brunson P, Mann PM, Mann PM, Potvin R. Comparison of refractive and visual acuity results after Contoura® Vision topography-guided LASIK planned with the phorcides analytic engine to results after wavefront-optimized LASIK in eyes with oblique astigmatism. PLoS One. 2022;17(12):e0279357. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279357
  • Motwani M. Predictions of residual astigmatism from surgical planning for topographic-guided LASIK based on anterior corneal astigmatism (LYRA Protocol) vs the phorcides analytic engine. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:3227–3236. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S272085
  • El Awady HE, Ghanem AA, Saleh SM. Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography customized ablation in myopic LASIK: comparative study of higher order aberrations. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011;42(4):314–320. doi:10.3928/15428877-20110421-01