Refractive Predictability of a Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer in Long and Short Eyes Implanted with Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses

References

• Schallhorn JM. Multifocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses: a comparison of data from the United States food and drug administration premarket approval trials. J Refract Surg. 2021;37(2):98–104. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20201111-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel A, Dick BH, Krummenauer F. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(12):1961–1968. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01214-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer KJ, Shammas JH, Savini G. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(4):644–648. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G, Huang J. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):62–67. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes-Mico R, Pastor-Pascual F, Ruiz-Mesa R, Tana-Rivero P. Ocular biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(6):802–814. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CM, Lim DH, Kim HJ, Chung TY. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223114. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett GD. An improved universal theoretical formula for intraocular lens power prediction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(6):713–720. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80339-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng H, Kane JX, Liu L, Li J, Cheng B, Wu M. Refractive predictability using the IOLMaster 700 and Artificial Intelligence-based IOL power formulas compared to standard formulas. J Refract Surg. 2020;36(7):466–472. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20200514-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melendez RF, Smits G, Nguyen T, Ruffaner-Hanson CD, Ortiz D, Hall B. Comparison of astigmatism prediction accuracy for toric lens implantation from two swept-source optical coherence tomography devices. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2022;16:3795–3802. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S378019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shammas HJ, Ortiz S, Shammas MC, Kim SH, Chong C. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):50–61. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Chen M, Ning R, et al. The precision of a new anterior segment optical coherence tomographer and its comparison with a swept-source OCT-based optical biometer in patients with cataract. J Refract Surg. 2021;37(9):616–622. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20210610-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shammas HJ, Taroni L, Pellegrini M, Shammas MC, Jivrajka RV. Accuracy of newer IOL power formulas in short and long eyes using sum-of-segments biometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(10):1113–1120. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shammas HJ, Shammas MC, Jivrajka RV, Cooke DL, Potvin R. Effects on IOL power calculation and expected clinical outcomes of axial length measurements based on multiple vs single refractive indices. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:1511–1519. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S256851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Cao D, Weikert MP, Koch DD. Calculation of axial length using a single group refractive index versus using different refractive indices for each ocular segment: theoretical study and refractive outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(5):663–670. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.12.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke DL, Cooke TL. Approximating sum-of-segments axial length from a traditional optical low-coherence reflectometry measurement. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(3):351–354. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale RP, Saldana M, Johnston RL, Zuberbuhler B, McKibbin M. Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery. Eye. 2009;23(1):149–152. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom M, Dickman M, Henry Y, et al. Risk factors for refractive error after cataract surgery: analysis of 282 811 cataract extractions reported to the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for cataract and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(4):447–452. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaldivar R, Shultz MC, Davidorf JM, Holladay JT. Intraocular lens power calculations in patients with extreme myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(5):668–674. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00367-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Shirayama M, Ma XJ, Kohnen T, Koch DD. Optimizing intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with axial lengths above 25.0 mm. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(11):2018–2027. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer KJ, Savini G. IOL power calculation in short and long eyes. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2017;6:330–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shammas HJ, Jabre JF. Validating e-norms methodology in ophthalmic biometry. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020;5(1):e000500. doi:10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omoto MK, Torii H, Masui S, Ayaki M, Tsubota K, Negishi K. Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):655. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42968-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar