131
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparison of the 1st Generation and 3rd Generation Wavefront-Guided LASIK for the Treatment of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

, ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 3579-3590 | Received 05 Aug 2023, Accepted 06 Nov 2023, Published online: 21 Nov 2023

References

  • Manche E, Roe J. Recent advances in wavefront-guided LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29(4):286–291. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000488
  • Kim A, Chuck RS. Wavefront-guided customized corneal ablation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(4):314–320. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e328302ccae
  • Jabbur NS, Kraff C, Visx Wavefront Study G. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using the WaveScan system for correction of low to moderate myopia with astigmatism: 6-month results in 277 eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(8):1493–1501. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.12.050
  • Partal AE, Manche EE. CustomVue laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Visx S4 excimer laser: efficacy, predictability, and safety. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(3):475–479. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.128
  • Schallhorn S, Brown M, Venter J, Teenan D, Hettinger K, Yamamoto H. Early clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided myopic LASIK treatments using a new-generation Hartmann-Shack aberrometer. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(1):14–21. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20131029-02
  • Smadja D, Santhiago MR, Tellouck J, et al. Safety and efficacy of wavefront-guided myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a new wavefront sensor technology: first 100 cases. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(8):1588–1593. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.11.053
  • Schallhorn SC, Venter JA, Hannan SJ, Hettinger KA. Outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using a new-generation Hartmann-Shack aberrometer in patients with high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(9):1810–1819. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.007
  • Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Randleman JB. JRS standard for reporting astigmatism outcomes of refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(10):654–659. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20140903-01
  • Waring GO, Reinstein DZ, Dupps WJ, et al. Standardized graphs and terms for refractive surgery results. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(1):7–9. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20101116-01
  • Summary of safety and effectiveness data: STAR S4 IRTM excimer laser system iDesign advanced wavescan studioTM system. Date of FDA Notice of Approval: 6th May, 2015. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/P930016S044B.pdf. Accessed March 21, 2023.
  • Summary of safety and effectiveness data: iDESIGN® refractive studio and STAR S4 IR® excimer laser systems. Date of FDA Notice of Approval: 9th September, 2019. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/P930016S057B.pdf. Accessed January 20, 2023.
  • Jung JW, Chung BH, Han SH, Kim EK, Seo KY, Kim TI. Comparison of measurements and clinical outcomes after wavefront-guided LASEK between iDesign and WaveScan. J Refract Surg. 2015;31(6):398–405. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20150521-06
  • Moshirfar M, Shah TJ, Skanchy DF, Linn SH, Kang P, Durrie DS. Comparison and analysis of FDA reported visual outcomes of the three latest platforms for LASIK: wavefront guided Visx iDesign, topography guided WaveLight Allegro Contoura, and topography guided Nidek EC-5000 CATz. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:135–147. doi:10.2147/opth.s115270
  • Moussa S, Dexl A, Krall EM, et al. Comparison of short-term refractive surgery outcomes after wavefront-guided versus non-wavefront-guided LASIK. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016;26(6):529–535. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000882
  • Prakash G, Srivastava D, Suhail M. Femtosecond laser-assisted wavefront-guided LASIK using a newer generation aberrometer: 1-year results. J Refract Surg. 2015;31(9):600–606. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20150820-05
  • Maloney RK, Kraff CR, Coleman SC. Wavefront-guided myopic laser in situ keratomileusis with a high-resolution Hartmann-Shack aberrometer and a new nomogram. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(7):847–854. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000539
  • Moussa S, Dexl AK, Krall EM, Arlt EM, Grabner G, Ruckhofer J. Visual, aberrometric, photic phenomena, and patient satisfaction after myopic wavefront-guided LASIK using a high-resolution aberrometer. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:2489–2496. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S108002
  • Duran JA, Gutierrez E, Atienza R, Pinero DP. Vector analysis of astigmatic changes and optical quality outcomes after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using a high-resolution aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(12):1515–1522. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.020
  • Smadja D, De Castro T, Tellouck L, et al. Wavefront analysis after wavefront-guided myopic LASIK using a new generation aberrometer. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(9):610–615. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20140815-01
  • Schallhorn JM, Seifert S, Schallhorn SC. SMILE, topography-guided LASIK, and wavefront-guided LASIK: review of clinical outcomes in premarket approval FDA studies. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(11):690–698. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190930-02
  • Schallhorn SC, Venter JA, Hannan SJ, Hettinger KA. Clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis to treat moderate-to-high astigmatism. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1291–1298. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S87887
  • Eydelman MB, Drum B, Holladay J, et al. Standardized analyses of correction of astigmatism by laser systems that reshape the cornea. J Refract Surg. 2006;22(1):81–95. doi:10.3928/1081-597X-20060101-16
  • Bullimore MA, Spooner G, Sluyterman G, Dishler JG. Correction of low levels of astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(8):1641–1649. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.12.060