136
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Personality Traits Associated with Treatment Choice with an Explicit Statistical Prediction After an Explanation in a Negative Context: A Study in Patients with Glaucoma

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 3685-3691 | Received 16 Aug 2023, Accepted 07 Nov 2023, Published online: 01 Dec 2023

References

  • Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262–267. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.081224
  • Yeaw J, Benner JS, Walt JG, Sian S, Smith DB. Comparing adherence and persistence across 6 chronic medication classes. JMCP. 2009;15(9):728–740. doi:10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.9.728
  • Nordstrom BL, Friedman DS, Mozaffari E, Quigley HA, Walker AM. Persistence and adherence with topical glaucoma therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(4):598.e1–598.e11. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.04.051
  • Peng J, Jiang Y, Miao D, Li R, Xiao W. Framing effects in medical situations: distinctions of attribute, goal and risky choice frames. J Int Med Res. 2013;41(3):771–776. doi:10.1177/0300060513476593
  • Nakano T, Kodaka F, Tsuneoka H. Differences in neuroticism between patients with glaucoma who have discontinued visits to ophthalmologists and those who make regular visits: implications for adherence to topical glaucoma medications. Ophthalmol Ther. 2016;5(2):207–214. doi:10.1007/s40123-016-0059-1
  • Lim MC, Watnik MR, Imson KR, Porter SM, Granier AM. Adherence to glaucoma medication: the effect of interventions and association with personality type. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(6):439–446. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31824cd0ae
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211(4481):453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683
  • Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann WB. A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. J Res Person. 2003;37(6):504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
  • Goldberg LR. An alternative “description of personality”: the big-five factor structure. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;59(6):1216–1229. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216
  • Oshio A, Abe S, Cutrone P. Development, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J). Japan J Person. 2012;21(1):40–52. doi:10.2132/personality.21.40
  • Bigman CA, Cappella JN, Hornik RC. Effective or ineffective: attribute framing and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81(Suppl):S70–76. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.08.014
  • Costa PT Professional manual for revised NEO personality inventory; 1992.
  • Shimonaka Y. Construction and factorial validity of the Japanese NEO-PI-R. Jpn J Pers. 1998;6:138–147.
  • Arthur W, Graziano WG. The five-factor model, conscientiousness, and driving accident involvement. J Pers. 1996;64(3):593–618. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00523.x
  • Raynor DA, Levine H. Associations between the five-factor model of personality and health behaviors among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2009;58(1):73–81. doi:10.3200/JACH.58.1.73-82
  • Booth-Kewley S, Vickers RR. Associations between major domains of personality and health behavior. J Pers. 1994;62(3):281–298. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00298.x
  • Fujino J, Fujimoto S, Kodaka F, et al. Neural mechanisms and personality correlates of the sunk cost effect. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):33171. doi:10.1038/srep33171