Scheimpflug-Derived Keratometric, Pachymetric and Pachymetric Progression Indices in the Diagnosis of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

References

• Kymes SM, Walline JJ, Zadnik K, Sterling J, Gordon MO. Changes in the Quality-of-Life of People with Keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(4):611–617.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto RDP, Abe RY, Gomes FC, et al. Quality of life in keratoconus: evaluation with keratoconus outcomes research questionnaire (KORQ). Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):12970. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-92346-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984;28(4):293–322. doi:10.1016/0039-6257(84)90094-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabti S, Tappeiner C, Frueh BE. corneal cross-linking in a 4-year-old child with keratoconus and down syndrome. Cornea. 2015;34(9):1157–1160. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández Pérez J, Valero Marcos A, Martínez Peña FJ. Early diagnosis of keratoconus: what difference is it making? Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(11):1465–1466. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sanctis U, Loiacono C, Richiardi L, Turco D, Mutani B, Grignolo FM. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(9):1534–1539. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.02.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muftuoglu O, Ayar O, Ozulken K, Ozyol E, Akıncı A. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(9):1348–1357. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñero DP, Alió JL, Alesón A, Vergara ME, Miranda M. Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(5):814–825. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goebels S, Eppig T, Wagenpfeil S, Cayless A, Seitz B, Langenbucher A. Staging of keratoconus indices regarding tomography, topography, and biomechanical measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(4):733–738.e3. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2015.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrósio R, Caiado ALC, Guerra FP, et al. Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus. J Refrac Surg. 2011;27(10):753–758. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20110721-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan JK, Belin MW, Borgstrom M. Assessing progression of keratoconus: novel tomographic determinants. Eye and Vision. 2016;3(1):6. doi:10.1186/s40662-016-0038-6
   Google Scholar
• Kovács I, Miháltz K, Kránitz K, et al. Accuracy of machine learning classifiers using bilateral data from a Scheimpflug camera for identifying eyes with preclinical signs of keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(2):275–283. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.09.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;29;n71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thulasidas M, Teotia P. Evaluation of corneal topography and tomography in fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients for early detection of subclinical keratoconus. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(11):2415–2420. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_2129_19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galletti JD, Ruiseñor Vázquez PR, Minguez N, et al. Corneal asymmetry analysis by pentacam scheimpflug tomography for keratoconus diagnosis. J Refrac Surg. 2015;31(2):116–123. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20150122-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo LL, Tian L, Cao K, et al. Comparison of the morphological and biomechanical characteristics of keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and normal corneas. Semin Ophthalmol. 2021;36(8):671–678. doi:10.1080/08820538.2021.1896752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy JC, Rapuano CJ, Cater JR, Suri K, Nagra PK, Hammersmith KM. Comparative evaluation of dual Scheimpflug imaging parameters in keratoconus, early keratoconus, and normal eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(4):582–592. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashem AO, Aziz BF, Wahba SS, Roshdy MM, Elawamry AI. Diagnostic accuracy of different keratoconus detection indices of pentacam in paediatric eyes. Eye. 2023;37(6):1130–1138. doi:10.1038/s41433-022-02070-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae GH, Kim JR, Kim CH, Lim DH, Chung ES, Chung TY. Corneal topographic and tomographic analysis of fellow eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients using pentacam. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(1):103–109.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan TCY, Biswas S, Yu M, Jhanji V. Comparison of corneal measurements in keratoconus using swept-source optical coherence tomography and combined Placido-Scheimpflug imaging. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(6):e486–94. doi:10.1111/aos.13298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienes L, Kránitz K, Juhász É, et al. Evaluation of intereye corneal asymmetry in patients with keratoconus. A scheimpflug imaging study. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e108882. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriquez MA, Izquierdo L, Belin MW. Intereye asymmetry in eyes with keratoconus and high ammetropia. Cornea. 2015;34(Supplement 10):S57–S60. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000608
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huseynli S, Salgado-Borges J, Alio JL. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28(5):521–534. doi:10.1177/1120672118760146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafarinasab MR, Feizi S, Karimian F, Hasanpour H. Evaluation of corneal elevation in eyes with subclinical keratoconus and keratoconus using Galilei double Scheimpflug analyzer. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013;23(3):377–384. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataria P, Padmanabhan P, Gopalakrishnan A, Padmanaban V, Mahadik S, Ambrósio R. Accuracy of Scheimpflug-derived corneal biomechanical and tomographic indices for detecting subclinical and mild keratectasia in a South Asian population. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(3):328–336. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.10.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosekahya P, Koc M, Caglayan M, Kiziltoprak H, Atilgan CU, Yilmazbas P. Repeatability and reliability of ectasia display and topometric indices with the Scheimpflug system in normal and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(1):63–70. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.10.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovács I, Miháltz K, Ecsedy M, Németh J, Nagy ZZ. The role of reference body selection in calculating posterior corneal elevation and prediction of keratoconus using rotating Scheimpflug camera. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89(3):e251–6. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02053.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Değirmenci C, Palamar M, Ismayilova N, Eğrilmez S, Yağcı A. Topographic evaluation of unilateral keratoconus patients. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2019;49(3):117–122. doi:10.4274/tjo.galenos.2018.90958
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henriquez MA, Izquierdo L, Mannis MJ. Intereye asymmetry detected by scheimpflug imaging in subjects with normal corneas and keratoconus. Cornea. 2013;32(6):779–782. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31827b14ae
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huseynova T, Abdulaliyeva F, Lanza M. Comparison of scheimpflug imaging parameters between steep and keratoconic corneas of caucasian eyes. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2016;603. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S102683
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krumeich JH, Daniel J, Knülle A. Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24(4):456–463. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80284-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc M, Tekin K, Kiziltoprak H, et al. Topometric and tomographic evaluation of subclinical keratoconus. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2020;27(4):289–297. doi:10.1080/09286586.2020.1741010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L LIM, Tan G, Hla Myint H, Lim HB. Comparison of keratometric and pachymetric parameters with Scheimpflug imaging in normal and keratoconic Asian eyes. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2014;8:2215. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S66598
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhang Y, Chen Y. Application of a scheimpflug-based biomechanical analyser and tomography in the early detection of subclinical keratoconus in Chinese patients. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021;21(1):339. doi:10.1186/s12886-021-02102-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miháltz K, Kovács I, Takács Á, Nagy ZZ. Evaluation of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation parameters of keratoconic corneas with pentacam. Cornea. 2009;28(9):976–980. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31819e34de
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderan M, Rajabi MT, Zarrinbakhsh P. Intereye asymmetry in bilateral keratoconus, keratoconus suspect and normal eyes and its relationship with disease severity. Bri J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(11):1475–1482. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicula CA, Bulboacă AE, Nicula D, Nicula AP, Horvath KU, Bolboacă SD. Performances of corneal topography and tomography in the diagnosis of subclinical and clinical keratoconus. Front Med Lausanne. 2022;9. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.904604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uçakhan ÖÖ, Çetinkor V, Özkan M, Kanpolat A. Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging parameters in subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, and normal eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(6):1116–1124. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.12.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orucoglu F, Toker E. Comparative analysis of anterior segment parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes generated by scheimpflug tomography. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:1–8. doi:10.1155/2015/925414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Xian Y, Han T, Wang X, Zhou X. Bilateral differential topography—a novel topographic algorithm for keratoconus and ectatic disease screening. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.772982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan TC, Wang YM, Yu M, Jhanji V. Comparison of corneal dynamic parameters and tomographic measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(1):42–47. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty R, Rao H, Khamar P, et al. Keratoconus screening indices and their diagnostic ability to distinguish normal from ectatic corneas. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;181:140–148. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.06.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg J, Aubke‐Schultz S, Frings A, et al. Correlation of the KISA% index and Scheimpflug tomography in ‘normal’, ‘subclinical’, ‘keratoconus‐suspect’ and ‘clinically manifest’ keratoconus eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(3):e199–207. doi:10.1111/aos.12590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiseñor Vázquez PR, Galletti JD, Minguez N, et al. Pentacam scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(1):32–40.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.03.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado MJ, Nieto JC, Piñero DP. Advances in technologies for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5(2):209–229. doi:10.1586/17434440.5.2.209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñero DP. Technologies for anatomical and geometric characterization of the corneal structure and anterior segment: a review. Semin Ophthalmol. 2015;30(3):161–170. doi:10.3109/08820538.2013.835844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñero DP, Nieto JC, Lopez-Miguel A. Characterization of corneal structure in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(12):2167–2183. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.10.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrósio R, Valbon BF, Faria-Correia F, Ramos I, Luz A. Scheimpflug imaging for laser refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24(4):310–320. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283622a94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavas-Martínez F, De la Cruz Sánchez E, Nieto Martínez J, Fernández Cañavate FJ, Fernández-Pacheco DG. Corneal topography in keratoconus: state of the art. Eye and Vision. 2016;3(1):5. doi:10.1186/s40662-016-0036-8
   Google Scholar
• Cui J, Zhang X, Hu Q, Zhou WY, Yang F. Evaluation of corneal thickness and volume parameters of subclinical keratoconus using a Pentacam Scheimflug system. Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(7):923–926. doi:10.3109/02713683.2015.1082188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes JAP, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, et al. Global Consensus on Keratoconus and Ectatic Diseases. Cornea. 2015;34(4):359–369. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGhee CNJ, Kim BZ, Wilson PJ. Contemporary treatment paradigms in keratoconus. Cornea. 2015;34(Supplement 10):S16–23. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlegel Z, Hoang-Xuan T, Gatinel D. Comparison of and correlation between anterior and posterior corneal elevation maps in normal eyes and keratoconus-suspect eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(5):789–795. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalbán R, Piñero DP, Javaloy J, Alió JL. Scheimpflug photography–based clinical characterization of the correlation of the corneal shape between the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces in the normal human eye. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(11):1925–1933. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.06.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalbán R, Piñero DP, Javaloy J, Alio JL. Correlation of the corneal toricity between anterior and posterior corneal surfaces in the normal human eye. Cornea. 2013;32(6):791–798. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31827bf898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomidokoro A, Oshika T, Amano S, Higaki S, Maeda N, Miyata K. Changes in anterior and posterior corneal curvatures in keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(7):1328–1332. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00159-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Meisler DM, Tang M, et al. Keratoconus diagnosis with optical coherence tomography pachymetry mapping. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(12):2159–2166. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens H, Watters GA. An evaluation of the keratoconic cornea using computerised corneal mapping and ultrasonic measurements of corneal thickness. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16(2):115–123. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.1996.95000178.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avitabile T, Marano F, Uva MG, Reibaldi A. Evaluation of central and peripheral corneal thickness with ultrasound biomicroscopy in normal and keratoconic eyes. Cornea. 1997;16(6):639–644. doi:10.1097/00003226-199711000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar