Comparative Analysis of the Osmoprotective Effects of Daily Disposable Contact Lens Packaging Solutions on Human Corneal Epithelial Cells

References

• Cope JR, Collier SA, Nethercut H, Jones JM, Yates K, Yoder JS. Risk behaviors for contact lens-related eye infections among adults and adolescents - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(32):841–845. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6632a2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Willcox Nichols JJ, Willcox MDP, et al. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(11):TFOS7–TFOS13. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):276–283. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belmonte C, Nichols JJ, Cox SM, et al. TFOS DEWS II pain and sensation report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):404–437. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes JAP, Azar DT, Baudouin C, et al. TFOS DEWS II iatrogenic report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):511–538. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox MDP, Argüeso P, Georgiev G, et al. TFOS DEWS II tear film report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):366–403. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Dumbleton K, Theodoratos P, et al. Pre-contact lens and pre-corneal tear film kinetics. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019;42(3):246–252. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2019.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Maissa C. Contact lens wear affects tear film evaporation. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34(6):326–330. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31818c5d00
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JD, Craig JP, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II introduction. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):269–275. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW. An amplifying cascade of contact lens-related end-of-day hyperaemia and dryness symptoms. Curr Eye Res. 2018;43(7):839–847. doi:10.1080/02713683.2018.1457163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour RA. Fundamental principles of the thermodynamics and kinetics of protein adsorption to material surfaces. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020;191:110992. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.110992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Asbell MP, Sheppard MJ. Current and future pharmacological therapies for the management of dry eye. Eye Contact Lens. 2020;46(Suppl 2):S64–S69 doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000666.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemp MA. Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on clinical trials in dry eyes. CLAO J. 1995;21(4):221–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemp MA, Foulks GN. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007;5(2):75–92. doi:10.1016/S1542-0124(12)70081-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li DQ, Luo L, Chen Z, Kim HS, Song XJ, Pflugfelder SC. JNK and ERK MAP kinases mediate induction of IL-1beta, TNF-alpha and IL-8 following hyperosmolar stress in human limbal epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res. 2006;82(4):588–596. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2005.08.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panigrahi T, Shivakumar S, Shetty R, et al. Trehalose augments autophagy to mitigate stress induced inflammation in human corneal cells. Ocul Surf. 2019;17(4):699–713. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2019.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflugfelder SC, de Paiva CS, Li DQ, Stern ME. Epithelial-immune cell interaction in dry eye. Cornea. 2008;27 Suppl 1(0 1):S9–S11. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31817f4075
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Igarashi T, Fujimoto C, Suzuki H, et al. Short-time exposure of hyperosmolarity triggers interleukin-6 expression in corneal epithelial cells. Cornea. 2014;33(12):1342–1347. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Chen D, Chen X, et al. Autophagy activation protects ocular surface from inflammation in a dry eye model in vitro. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(23):8966. doi:10.3390/ijms21238966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favero G, Moretti E, Krajčíková K, Tomečková V, Rezzani R. Evidence of polyphenols efficacy against dry eye disease. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10(2):190. doi:10.3390/antiox10020190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ubels JL, Williams KK, Lopez Bernal D, Edelhauser HF. Evaluation of effects of a physiologic artificial tear on the corneal epithelial barrier: electrical resistance and carboxy fluorescein permeability. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1994;350:441–452.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pflugfelder SC, Bian F, De Paiv C. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 in the pathophysiology and diagnosis of dry eye syndrome. Metalloproteinases Med. 2017;4:37–46. doi:10.2147/MNM.S107246
   Google Scholar
• Khajavi N, Reinach PS, Skrzypski M, Lude A, Mergler S. L-carnitine reduces in human conjunctival epithelial cells hypertonic-induced shrinkage through interacting with TRPV1 channels. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;34(3):790–803. doi:10.1159/000363043
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khandekar N, Willcox MD, Shih S, Simmons P, Vehige J, Garrett Q. Decrease in hyperosmotic stress-induced corneal epithelial cell apoptosis by L-carnitine. Mol Vis. 2013;19:1945–1956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdan ED, Stuard WL, Titone R, Robertson DM. IGFBP-3 mediates metabolic homeostasis during hyperosmolar stress in the corneal epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2021;62(7):11. doi:10.1167/iovs.62.7.11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzmán M, Miglio M, Keitelman I, et al. Transient tear hyperosmolarity disrupts the neuroimmune homeostasis of the ocular surface and facilitates dry eye onset. Immunology. 2020;161(2):148–161. doi:10.1111/imm.13243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirata H, Mizerska K, Marfurt CF, Rosenblatt MI. Hyperosmolar tears induce functional and structural alterations of corneal nerves: electrophysiological and anatomical evidence toward neurotoxicity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:8125e40. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-18383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bron AJ, de Paiva CS, Chauhan SK, et al. TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):438–510. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massingale ML, Li X, Vallabhajosyula M, Chen D, Wei Y, Asbell PA. Analysis of inflammatory cytokines in the tears of dry eye patients. Cornea. 2009;28(9):1023–1027. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181a16578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Li Q, Ye M, Yu J. Tear Luminex analysis in dry eye patients. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:7595–7602. doi:10.12659/MSM.912010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Chen X, Ma Y, et al. Analysis of tear inflammatory molecules and clinical correlations in evaporative dry eye disease caused by meibomian gland dysfunction. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40(11):3049–3058. doi:10.1007/s10792-020-01489-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pena-Verdeal H, Garcia-Queiruga J, García-Resúa C, Yebra-Pimentel E, Giráldez MJ. Osmolality and pH of commercially available contact lens care solutions and eye drops. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021;44(4):101379. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2020.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton K, Subbaraman LN, Rogers R, Jones L. Physical properties of soft contact lens solutions. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(2):122–128. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318162261e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavet ME, Harrington KL, Ward KW, Zhang JZ. Mapracorat, a novel selective glucocorticoid receptor agonist, inhibits hyperosmolar-induced cytokine release and MAPK pathways in human corneal epithelial cells. Mol Vis. 2010;16:1791–1800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higuchi A, Kawakita T, Tsubota K. IL-6 induction in desiccated corneal epithelium in vitro and in vivo. Mol Vis. 2011;17:2400–2406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudouin C, Aragona P, Messmer EM, et al. Role of hyperosmolarity in the pathogenesis and management of dry eye disease: proceedings of the OCEAN group meeting. Ocul Surf. 2013;11(4):246–258. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2013.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Downie LE, Korb D, et al. TFOS DEWS II management and therapy report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):575–628. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrales RM, Luo L, Chang EY, Pflugfelder SC. Effects of osmoprotectants on hyperosmolar stress in cultured human corneal epithelial cells. Cornea. 2008;27(5):574–579. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e318165b19e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng R, Su Z, Hua X, Zhang Z, Li DQ, Pflugfelder SC. Osmoprotectants suppress the production and activity of matrix metalloproteinases induced by hyperosmolarity in primary human corneal epithelial cells. Mol Vis. 2014;20:1243–1252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua X, Su Z, Deng R, Lin J, Li DQ, Pflugfelder SC. Effects of L-carnitine, erythritol and betaine on pro-inflammatory markers in primary human corneal epithelial cells exposed to hyperosmotic stress. Curr Eye Res. 2015;40(7):657–667. doi:10.3109/02713683.2014.957776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan E, Valtink M, Reinach PS, et al. L-carnitine suppresses transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 activity and myofibroblast transdifferentiation in human corneal keratocytes. Lab Invest. 2021;101(6):680–689. doi:10.1038/s41374-021-00538-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Cano JJ, González-Cela-Casamayor MA, Andrés-Guerrero V, Herrero-Vanrell R, Benítez-Del-Castillo JM, Molina-Martínez IT. Combined hyperosmolarity and inflammatory conditions in stressed human corneal epithelial cells and macrophages to evaluate osmoprotective agents as potential DED treatments. Exp Eye Res. 2021;211:108723. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2021.108723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iturriaga G, Suárez R, Nova-Franco B. Trehalose metabolism: from osmoprotection to signaling. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10:3793–3810. doi:10.3390/ijms10093793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragona P, Colosi P, Rania L, et al. Protective effects of trehalose on the corneal epithelial cells. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:717835. doi:10.1155/2014/717835
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsuo T. Trehalose protects corneal epithelial cells from death by drying. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(5):610–612. doi:10.1136/bjo.85.5.610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovakimyan M, Ramoth T, Löbler M, et al. Evaluation of protective effects of trehalose on desiccation of epithelial cells in three dimensional reconstructed human corneal epithelium. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37(11):982–989. doi:10.3109/02713683.2012.700754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill-Bator A, Misiuk-Hojło M, Marycz K, Grzesiak J. Trehalose-based eye drops preserve viability and functionality of cultured human corneal epithelial cells during desiccation. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:292139. doi:10.1155/2014/292139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Chen D, Chen X, et al. Trehalose induces autophagy against inflammation by activating TFEB signaling pathway in human corneal epithelial cells exposed to hyperosmotic stress. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(10):26. doi:10.1167/iovs.61.10.26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett Q, Khandekar N, Shih S, et al. Betaine stabilizes cell volume and protects against apoptosis in human corneal epithelial cells under hyperosmotic stress. Exp Eye Res. 2013;108:33–41. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2012.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslan Bayhan S, Bayhan HA, Muhafız E, Bekdemir Ş, Gürdal C. Effects of osmoprotective eye drops on tear osmolarity in contact lens wearers. Can J Ophthalmol. 2015;50(4):283–289. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Jimenez E, Diz-Arias E, Peral A. Improving ocular surface comfort in contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2022;45(3):101544. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2021.101544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflugfelder SC. Tear dysfunction and the cornea: LXVIII Edward Jackson memorial lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(6):900–909.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 18369-1:2017. Ophthalmic optics. Contact lenses. Part 1: Vocabulary, classification system and recommendations for labelling specifications. International Organization for Standardization. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pence N. Thinking inside the blister. Cont Lens Spectrum. 2009;24(5):25.
   Google Scholar
• DAILIES TOTAL1® and DAILIES TOTAL1® Multifocal (delefilcon A) soft contact lenses for Daily Disposable Wear [package insert]. Fort Worth, TX: Alcon Laboratories, Inc.; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Package Insert for Alcon Precision1™ (verofilcon A) Soft Contact Lenses [package insert]. Fort Worth, TX: Alcon Laboratories, Inc.; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• BAUSCH + LOMB INFUSE® (kalifilcon A) One-Day Soft (Hydrophilic) Contact Lenses [package insert]. Rochester, NY: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• CLARITI 1 DAY CONTACT LENS [package insert]. Scottsville, NY: CooperVision; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA 510(k) Summary K191763. MyDay (stenfilcon A) Soft (Hydrophilic) Daily Disposable Contact Lens; 2019. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf19/K190965.pdf. Accessed August 8, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• 1-DAY ACUVUE® TruEye® Brand Contact Lenses with HYDRACLEAR® 1 Technology (narafilcon A). Visibility Tinted with UV Blocker for Daily Wear Single Use Only [package insert]. Jacksonville, FL: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (Jacksonville, FL). ACUVUE® oasys BRAND CONTACT LENS 1-Day with HydraLuxe™ [package insert]. Jacksonville, FL: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Cavet ME, Harrington KL, Vollmer TR, Ward KW, Zhang JZ. Anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects of the green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin gallate in human corneal epithelial cells. Mol Vis. 2011;17:533–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai TY, Chen TC, Wang IJ, et al. The effect of resveratrol on protecting corneal epithelial cells from cytotoxicity caused by moxifloxacin and benzalkonium chloride. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(3):1575–1584. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-15708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson A, Khanal S, Ramaesh K, Diaper C, McFadyen A. Tear film osmolarity: determination of a referent for dry eye diagnosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(10):4309–4315. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerdrum B, Gundersen KG, Lundmark PO, Aakre BM. Repeatability of OCT-based versus scheimpflug- and reflection-based keratometry in patients with hyperosmolar and normal tear film. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:3991–4003. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S280868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashbayev B, Utheim TP, Utheim ØA, et al. Utility of tear osmolarity measurement in diagnosis of dry eye disease. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5542. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-62583-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW. Conjunctival tear layer temperature, evaporation, hyperosmolarity, inflammation, hyperemia, tissue damage, and symptoms: a review of an amplifying cascade. Curr Eye Res. 2017;42(12):1574–1584. doi:10.1080/02713683.2017.1377261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Begley C, Chen M, et al. A link between tear instability and hyperosmolarity in dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(8):3671–3679. doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Nagarajan A, Uchil PD. Analysis of cell viability by the alamarBlue assay. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2018;2018(6). doi:10.1101/pdb.prot095489
   Google Scholar
• Fong PY, Shih KC, Lam PY, Chan TCY, Jhanji V, Tong L. Role of tear film biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of dry eye disease. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2019;9(3):150–159. doi:10.4103/tjo.tjo_56_19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kishimoto T. The biology of Interleukin-6. Blood. 1989;74(1):1–10. doi:10.1182/blood.V74.1.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggiolini M, Clark-Lewis I. Interleukin-8, a chemotactic and inflammatory cytokine. FEBS Lett. 1992;307(1):97–101. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(92)80909-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepp MA, Menko AS. Immune responses to injury and their links to eye disease. Transl Res. 2021;236:52–71. doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2021.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng L, Zhong J, Xiao Y, et al. Therapeutic effects of an anti-IL-6 antibody in fungal keratitis: macrophage inhibition and T cell subset regulation. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;85:106649. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakimoto T, Sugaya S, Ishimori A, Sawa M. Anti-inflammatory effect of IL-6 receptor blockade in corneal alkali burn. Exp Eye Res. 2012;97(1):98–104. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2012.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong RA, Davies LN, Dunne MC, Gilmartin B. Statistical guidelines for clinical studies of human vision. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(2):123–136. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00815.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insua Pereira E, Sampaio AP, Lira M. Effects of contact lens wear on tear inflammatory biomarkers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2022;45(5):101600. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2022.101600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández I, López-Miguel A, Martín-Montañez V, et al. Inflammatory status predicts contact lens discomfort under adverse environmental conditions. Ocul Surf. 2020;18(4):829–840. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2020.07.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton K, Woods CA, Jones LW, Fonn D. The impact of contemporary contact lenses on contact lens discontinuation. Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39(1):93–99. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e318271caf4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Montañez V, Enríquez-de-Salamanca A, López-de la Rosa A, et al. Effect of environmental conditions on the concentration of tear inflammatory mediators during contact lens wear. Cornea. 2016;35(9):1192–1198. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N. Contact lens wear is intrinsically inflammatory. Clin Exp Optom. 2017;100(1):3–19. doi:10.1111/cxo.12487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saliman NH, Morgan PB, MacDonald AS, Maldonado-Codina C. Subclinical inflammation of the ocular surface in soft contact lens wear. Cornea. 2020;39(2):146–154. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000002192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Brennan NA, Bright FV, et al. 2. Contact lens care and ocular surface homeostasis. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013;36(Suppl 1):S9–S13. doi:10.1016/S1367-0484(13)60004-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schafer J, Reindel W, Steffen R, Mosehauer G, Chinn J. Use of a novel extended blink test to evaluate the performance of two polyvinylpyrrolidone-containing, silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:819–825. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S162233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer J, Steffen R, Mosehauer G, Reindel W, Wygladacz K, Seyboth S Evaluation of the stability of surface water characteristics of contact lenses using refractive index shifts after wear of daily disposable lenses. Abstract presented at: the Global Specialty Lens Symposium; January 21–23; 2021; Virtual.
   Google Scholar
• Reindel W, Steffen R, Mosehauer G, et al. Performance of a silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lens among wearers with lens-related dryness. Open J Ophthalmol. 2023;17:e187436412303021. doi:10.2174/18743641-v17-230316-2022-57
   Google Scholar
• Menzies KL, Rogers R, Jones L. In vitro contact angle analysis and physical properties of blister pack solutions of daily disposable contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2010;36(1):10–18. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181c5b385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzies KL, Jones L. In vitro analysis of the physical properties of contact lens blister pack solutions. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(4):493–501. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ff9d39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorbet MB, Tanti NC, Jones L, Sheardown H. Corneal epithelial cell biocompatibility to silicone hydrogel and conventional hydrogel contact lens packaging solutions. Mol Vis. 2010;16:272–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy CK, Cho P, Boost MV. Cytotoxicity and effects on metabolism of contact lens care solutions on human corneal epithelium cells. Clin Exp Optom. 2012;95(2):198–206. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00687.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavet ME, VanDerMeid KR, Harrington KL, Tchao R, Ward KW, Zhang JZ. Effect of a novel multipurpose contact lens solution on human corneal epithelial barrier function. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33(Suppl 1):S18–S23. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2010.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montani G, Martino M. Tear film characteristics during wear of daily disposable contact lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:1521–1531. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S242422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorente-Velázquez A, García-Montero M, Gómez-Sanz FJ, Rico Del Viejo L, Hernández-Verdejo JL, Madrid-Costa D. Comparison of the impact of nesofilcon A hydrogel contact lens on the ocular surface and the comfort of presbyopic and non-presbyopic wearers. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019;12(4):640–646. doi:10.18240/ijo.2019.04.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pena-Verdeal H, Noya-Padin V, Losada-Oubiña M, Saborido-Rey M, Vilas-Alonso M, Giraldez MJ. Changes of symptomatology, tear film and ocular surface integrity one week during somofilcon-A and omafilcon-A lens wear. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2023;33(2):890–899. doi:10.1177/11206721221131131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapkota K, Franco S, Lira M. Daily versus monthly disposable contact lens: which is better for ocular surface physiology and comfort? Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41(3):252–257. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2017.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diec J, Papas E, Naduvilath T, Xu P, Holden BA, Lazon de la Jara P. Combined effect of comfort and adverse events on contact lens performance. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(7):674–681. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl U, Willcox M, Stapleton F. Role of hypo-osmotic saline drops in ocular comfort during contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33(2):68–75. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2010.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonge S, Jones L, Goodall S, Tighe B. The ex vivo wettability of soft contact lenses. Curr Eye Res. 2001;23(1):51–59. doi:10.1076/ceyr.23.1.51.5418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, McAuley A, Schilke KF, McGuire J. Molecular origins of surfactant-mediated stabilization of protein drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63(13):1160–1171. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2011.06.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin J, Mustafi D, Poellmann MJ, Lee RC. Amphiphilic copolymers reduce aggregation of unfolded lysozyme more effectively than polyethylene glycol. Phys Biol. 2017;14(1):016003. doi:10.1088/1478-3975/aa5788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Singh J. Effect of polyols on the conformational stability and biological activity of a model protein lysozyme. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2003;4(3):E42. doi:10.1208/pt040342
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kathuria A, Shamloo K, Jhanji V, Sharma A. Categorization of marketed artificial tear formulations based on their ingredients: a rational approach for their use. J Clin Med. 2021;10(6):1289. doi:10.3390/jcm10061289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman WG, Wilson G. Essential ions for maintenance of the corneal epithelial surface. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26(11):1484–1488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar