Advanced search
Publication Cover
Clinical Ophthalmology Volume 17, 2023 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
132
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Assessing Agreement and Variability Among Alternative Devices for Intraocular Pressure Measurement: A Comparative Study

Chen-Wei Lin1 Department of Medical Education, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, 61363, Taiwan;2 Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, 61363, TaiwanORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7025-2770
ORCID Icon,
Jin-Jhe Wang2 Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, 61363, TaiwanCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Chien-Hsiung Lai2 Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, 61363, Taiwan;3 Department of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, 33302, Taiwan;4 Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi, 61363, Taiwan;5 School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, 33302, Taiwan
,
Chau-Yin Chen2 Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, 61363, Taiwan;3 Department of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, 33302, Taiwan
&
Ing-Chou Lai2 Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, 61363, Taiwan;3 Department of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, 33302, Taiwan;6 Department of Ophthalmology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, 83301, Taiwan
Pages 3453-3461 | Received 02 Sep 2023, Accepted 01 Nov 2023, Published online: 15 Nov 2023

References

  • Shiose Y. Intraocular pressure: new perspectives. Surv Ophthalmol. 1990;34(6):413–435. doi:10.1016/0039-6257(90)90122-C
  • Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):714–720. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.6.714
  • Gordon MO, Kass MA. What we have learned from the ocular hypertension treatment study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;189:xxiv–xxvii. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.02.016
  • Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(10):1268–1279. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268
  • Yao F, Peng J, Zhang E, et al. Pathologically high intraocular pressure disturbs normal iron homeostasis and leads to retinal ganglion cell ferroptosis in glaucoma. Cell Death Differ. 2023;30(1):69–81. doi:10.1038/s41418-022-01046-4
  • Biswas S, Jhanji V, Leung CK. Prevalence of glaucoma in myopic corneal refractive surgery candidates in Hong Kong China. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(5):298–304. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160229-01
  • Kim YW, Park KH. Exogenous influences on intraocular pressure. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(9):1209–1216. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313381
  • Biswas S, Biswas P. Relationship between diurnal variation in intraocular pressure and central corneal power. Optom Vis Sci. 2023;100(1):96–104. doi:10.1097/opx.0000000000001974
  • Chen M, Zhang L, Xu J, et al. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):1–10. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1236-5
  • Badakere SV, Chary R, Choudhari NS, Rao HL, Garudadri C, Senthil S. Agreement of intraocular pressure measurement of Icare ic200 with Goldmann applanation tonometer in adult eyes with normal cornea. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2021;4(3):238–243. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2021.04.002
  • Nakakura S, Asaoka R, Terao E, et al. Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. Eye and Vis. 2021;8(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/s40662-021-00249-z
  • Wu Y, Luttrell I, Feng S, et al. Development and validation of a machine learning, smartphone-based tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(10):1394–1398. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315446
  • Jose J, Ramesh SV, Pai HV, et al. Agreement and repeatability of Icare ic100 tonometer. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(10):2122. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_546_19
  • Nayak RR, Kandula P, Johri B, Pai SG, Kamath SJ. A comparative study of intraocular pressure measurement using tonopen and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Int J Sci Res. 2017;6(5):665–669.
  • Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(3):213–217. doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000212208.87523.66
  • Jansson U, Brautaset R, Cerviño A, Nilsson M. A comparison of the canon TX-20P™ non-contact tonometer and pachymeter in healthy eyes. Int J Ophthalmic Pract. 2012;3(3):96–102. doi:10.12968/ijop.2012.3.3.96
  • Tamçelik N, Atalay E, Cicik E, Özkök A. Comparability of Icare pro rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation and noncontact tonometer in a wide range of intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmic Res. 2015;54(1):18–25. doi:10.1159/000381781
  • Kutzscher AE, Kumar RS, Ramgopal B, et al. Reproducibility of 5 methods of ocular tonometry. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019;2(6):429–434. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2019.07.006
  • Kim KN, Jeoung JW, Park KH, Yang MK, Kim DM. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(5):e392–e396. doi:10.1111/aos.12109
  • Bao B, Diaconita V, Schulz DC, Hutnik C. Tono-pen versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparison of 898 eyes. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019;2(6):435–439. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2019.07.004

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.