Consistency in Standalone Canaloplasty Outcomes Using the iTrack Microcatheter

References

• Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(12):e1221–e1234. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham YCC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CYY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–2090. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldmann H, Schmidt T. Über Applanationstonometrie [Applanation tonometry]. Ophthalmologica. 1957;134(4):221–242. doi:10.1159/000303213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the early manifest glaucoma trial. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2002;120(10):1268–1279. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Glaucoma Society. European glaucoma society terminology and guidelines for glaucoma, 4th edition - Chapter 2: classification and terminology supported by the EGS foundation: part 1: foreword; introduction; glossary; Chapter 2 classification and terminology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(5):73–127. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-EGSguideline.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillunat LE, Erb C, Jünemann AG, Kimmich F. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS): a review of surgical procedures using stents. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1583–1600. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S135316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnljots TS, Economou MA. Kahook dual blade goniotomy vs istent inject: long-term results in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:541–550. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S284687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis BA, Singh K, Lin SC, et al. Novel glaucoma procedures: a report by the American Academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(7):1466–1480. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel M, Picciani RG, Lee RK, Bhattacharya SK. Aqueous humor dynamics: a review. Open Ophthalmol J. 2010;4(1):52–59. doi:10.2174/1874364101004010052
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathalone N, Hyams M, Neiman S, Buckman G, Hod Y, Geyer O. Long-term intraocular pressure control after clear corneal phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(3):479–483. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.06.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shingleton BJ, Pasternack JJ, Hung JW, O’Donoghue MW. Three and five year changes in intraocular pressures after clear corneal phacoemulsification in open angle glaucoma patients, glaucoma suspects, and normal patients. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(6):494–498. doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000212294.31411.92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo MJ. 36-month effectiveness of ab-interno canaloplasty standalone versus combined with cataract surgery for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022;5(5):476–482. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2022.02.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khaimi MA. Long-term medication reduction in controlled glaucoma with iTrack ab-interno canaloplasty as a standalone procedure and combined with cataract surgery. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021;13:251584142110457. doi:10.1177/25158414211045751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerber N, Ondrejka S. 6-year efficacy and safety of iTrack ab-interno canaloplasty as a standalone procedure and combined with cataract surgery in primary open-angle and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2023. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002311
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koerber NJ, Ondrejka S. 4-year efficacy and safety of iTrack ab-interno canaloplasty as a standalone procedure and combined with cataract surgery in open-angle glaucoma. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2022;2022:1
   Google Scholar
• Shaarawy TM, Sherwood MB, Grehn F. Guidelines on Design and Reporting of Surgical Trials. World Glaucoma Association; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ondrejka S, Koerber N, Dhamdhere K. Long term effect of canaloplasty on IOP and use of IOP-lowering medications in patients with open angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(12):1388–1393. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazerounian S, Zimbelmann M, Lörtscher M, Hommayda S, Tsirkinidou I, Müller M. Canaloplasty ab interno (AbiC) – 2-year-results of a novel Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) technique. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2020;238(10):1113–1119. doi:10.1055/a-1250-8431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Von Wolff K, Tetz M, et al. Canaloplasty: three-year results of circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm canal using a microcatheter to treat open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(4):682–690. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillmann K, Aref A, Niegowski LJ, Baumgartner JM. Combined Ab interno viscocanaloplasty (ABiC) in open-angle glaucoma: 12-month outcomes. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(10):3295–3301. doi:10.1007/s10792-021-01891-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davids AMM, Pahlitzsch M, Boeker A, Winterhalter S, Maier-Wenzel AKK, Klamann M. Ab interno canaloplasty (ABiC)—12-month results of a new minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(9):1947–1953. doi:10.1007/s00417-019-04366-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz KM, Gill MS, Murphy DA, Ding K, Khaimi MA. Surgical management of intraocular pressure with ab interno canaloplasty inPostkeratoplasty patients: 12-month results. Cornea. 2022;42(1):52–59. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000003009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price MO, Thompson RW, Price FW. Risk factors for various causes of failure in initial corneal grafts. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(8):1087–1092. doi:10.1001/archopht.121.8.1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong H, Gorantla V, Zhang Y, Freddo TF, Swain D Morphological changes in the distal outflow pathway of primary open angle glaucoma. In: Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wang K, Read AT, Sulchek T, Ethier CR. Trabecular meshwork stiffness in glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2017;158:3–12. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2016.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan SS, Oh DJ, Kang MH, Rhee DJ. Aqueous outflow: segmental and distal flow. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(8):1263–1272. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha EDK, Xu J, Gong L, Gong H. Variations in active outflow along the trabecular outflow pathway. Exp Eye Res. 2016;146:354–360. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2016.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allingham RR, de KATER AW, Ethier CR, Ethier RC. Schlemm’s canal and primary open angle glaucoma: correlation between Schlemm’s canal dimensions and outflow facility. Exp Eye Res. 1996;62(1):101–110. doi:10.1006/exer.1996.0012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hann CR, Vercnocke AJ, Bentley MD, Jorgensen SM, Fautsch MP. Anatomic changes in Schlemm’s canal and collector channels in normal and primary open-angle glaucoma eyes using low and high perfusion pressures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(9):5834–5841. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-14128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi RC. Aqueous outflow pathway in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972;56(3):157–174. doi:10.1136/bjo.56.3.157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craven ER, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Giamporcaro JE. Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(8):1339–1345. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer N, Garcia-Feijoo J, Martinez-De-La-Casa JM, et al. A randomized trial of a schlemm’s canal microstent with phacoemulsification for reducing intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(7):1283–1293. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saheb H, Le K. iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent for open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:1937. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S45920
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandão LM, Grieshaber MC. Update on Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) and new implants. J Ophthalmol. 2013;2013:1–12. doi:10.1155/2013/705915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed IIK, Fea A, Au L, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing Hydrus and istent microinvasive glaucoma surgery implants for standalone treatment of open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(1):52–61. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellik SR, Dale EA. A review of the iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stent: safety and efficacy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:677. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S57217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovic M, Campos-Moller X, Saheb H, Ahmed IIK. Efficacy and adverse event profile of the istent and istent inject trabecular micro-bypass for open-angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2018;12(2):67. doi:10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10008-1248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shalaby WS, Lam S, Arbabi A, et al. iStent versus iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification in open angle glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69(9):2488. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_308_21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziaei H, Au L. Manchester iStent study: long-term 7-year outcomes. Eye. 2021;35(8):2277–2282. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-01255-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guedes RAP, Gravina DM, Lake JC, Guedes VMP, Chaoubah A. One-year comparative evaluation of istent or istent inject implantation combined with cataract surgery in a single center. Adv Ther. 2019;36(10):2797–2810. doi:10.1007/s12325-019-01067-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning D. Real-world case series of iStent or iStent inject trabecular micro-bypass stents combined with cataract surgery. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8(4):549–561. doi:10.1007/s40123-019-00208-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitta K, Yamada Y, Morokado S, Sugiyama K. Istent trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation with cataract surgery in a Japanese glaucoma population. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:3381–3391. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S274281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozera M, Konopińska J, Mariak Z, Rękas M. Effectiveness of iStent trabecular micro-bypass system combined with phacoemulsification vs. phacoemulsification alone in patients with glaucoma and cataract depending on the initial intraocular pressure. Ophthalmic Res. 2020;64(2):327–336. doi:10.1159/000511456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson TW, Chang DF, Marquis R, et al. A schlemm canal microstent for intraocular pressure reduction in primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: the HORIZON study. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(1):29–37. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes DP, Clement CI, Nguyen V, et al. Comparative study of 2‐year outcomes for Hydrus or iStent inject microinvasive glaucoma surgery implants with cataract surgery. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;50(3):303–311. doi:10.1111/ceo.14048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hengerer FH, Auffarth GU, Conrad-Hengerer I. iStent inject trabecular micro-bypass with or without cataract surgery yields sustained 5-year glaucoma control. Adv Ther. 2022;39(3):1417–1431. doi:10.1007/s12325-021-02039-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salimi A, Watt H, Harasymowycz P. Long-term outcomes of two first-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents (iStent) with phacoemulsification in primary open-angle glaucoma: eight-year results. Eye Vis. 2021;8(1):43. doi:10.1186/s40662-021-00263-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar