Prospective Study of Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy Performed by Trainees

References

• Saheb H, Ahmed II. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23(2):96–104. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff1e7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed II. MIGS and the FDA: what’s in a Name? Ophthalmology. 2015;122(9):1737–1739. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedde SJ, Lind JT, Wright MM, et al. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Suspect Preferred Practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(1):P151–P192. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown RH, Tsegaw S, Dhamdhere K, Lynch MG. Viscodilation of Schlemm canal and trabeculotomy combined with cataract surgery for reducing intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(4):644–645. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vold SD, Williamson BK, Hirsch L, et al. Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy with the OMNI System in Pseudophakic Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma: the ROMEO Study. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2021;4(2):173–181. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2020.10.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirsch L, Cotliar J, Vold S, et al. Canaloplasty and trabeculotomy ab interno with the OMNI system combined with cataract surgery in open-angle glaucoma: 12-month outcomes from the ROMEO study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(7):907–915. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson BK, Vold SD, Campbell A, et al. Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy with the OMNI System in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma: two-Year Results from the ROMEO Study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:1057–1066. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S407918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo MJ, Sarkisian SR, Vold SD, et al. Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy Combined with Phacoemulsification in Open-Angle Glaucoma: interim Results from the GEMINI Study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:481–489. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S296740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo MJ, Pyfer MF, Vold SD, et al. Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy Combined with Phacoemulsification for Glaucoma: 12-Month Results of the GEMINI Study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:1225–1234. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S362932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu G, Hildreth T, Phelan PS, Fraser SG. The relation of volume and outcome in trabeculectomy. Eye. 2007;21(7):921–924. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmunds B, Bunce CV, Thompson JR, Salmon JF, Wormald RP. Factors associated with success in first-time trabeculectomy for patients at low risk of failure with chronic open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(1):97–103. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavia C, Dallorto L, Maule M, Ceccarelli M, Fea AM. Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183142. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadgarov A, Dentice K, Aljabi Q. Real-World Outcomes of Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy Combined with Cataract Surgery in Eyes with All Stages of Open-Angle Glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:2609–2617. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S422132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleeker AR, Litchfield WR, Ibach MJ, et al. Short-Term Efficacy of Combined ab Interno Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy in Pseudophakic Eyes with Open-Angle Glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:2295–2303. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S367896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo MJ, Dhamdhere K, Dickerson JE. Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy Ab Interno Combined with Cataract Surgery: 12-Month Outcomes in Hispanic Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:905–908. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S358878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toneatto G, Zeppieri M, Papa V, et al. 360° Ab-Interno Schlemm’s Canal Viscodilation with OMNI Viscosurgical Systems for Open-Angle Glaucoma-Midterm Results. J Clin Med. 2022;11(1):259. doi:10.3390/jcm11010259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes T, Traynor M. Clinical Results of Ab Interno Canaloplasty in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:3641–3650. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S275087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klabe K, Kaymak H. Standalone Trabeculotomy and Viscodilation of Schlemm’s Canal and Collector Channels in Open-Angle Glaucoma Using the OMNI Surgical System: 24-Month Outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:3121–3129. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S325394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabska-Liberek I, Duda P, Rogowska M, et al. 12-month interim results of a prospective study of patients with mild to moderate open-angle glaucoma undergoing combined viscodilation of Schlemm’s canal and collector channels and 360° trabeculotomy as a standalone procedure or combined with cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022;32(1):309–315. doi:10.1177/1120672121998234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinod K, Gedde SJ. Safety profile of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2021;32(2):160–168. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor L, Lindfield D, Ghinelli F, et al. Systematic Literature Review of Clinical, Economic, and Humanistic Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery or Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty for the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma with or Without Cataract Extraction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:85–101. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S389406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilforushan N, Yadgari M, Astaraki A, Miraftabi A. Comparison of the long-term outcomes of resident versus attending performed trabeculectomy. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017;29(3):169–174. doi:10.1016/j.joco.2017.02.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwong A, Law SK, Kule RR, et al. Long-term outcomes of resident- versus attending-performed primary trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in a United States residency program. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(6):1190–1201. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.02.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thangamathesvaran L, Crane E, Modi K, Khouri AS. Outcomes of Resident-versus attending-performed Tube Shunt Surgeries in a United States Residency Program. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2018;12(2):53–58. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1245
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zheng CX, Copparam S, Lin MM, et al. Outcomes of trabecular microbypass surgery: comparison of resident trainees and attending surgeons. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(12):1704–1710. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.07.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillmann K, Bravetti GE, Mermoud A, Mansouri K. A Prospective Analysis of iStent Inject Microstent Positioning: schlemm Canal Dilatation and Intraocular Pressure Correlations. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(7):613–621. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillmann K, Mansouri K, Ambresin A, Bravetti GE, Mermoud A. A Prospective Analysis of iStent Inject Microstent Implantation: surgical Outcomes, Endothelial Cell Density, and Device Position at 12 Months. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(8):639–647. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujari A, Rakheja V, Dada T, et al. Gonioscopy and Angle-Based Glaucoma Surgical Training on Human Eyes in the Wet Lab. J Glaucoma. 2022;31(10):839–845. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarali S, Arora A, Ford B, et al. Cadaver corneoscleral model for angle surgery training. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(1):76–79. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora A, Nazarali S, Sawatzky L, et al. K-RIM (Corneal Rim) Angle Surgery Training Model. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(2):146–149. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang Y, Waxman S, Wang C, et al. Rapid learning curve assessment in an ex vivo training system for microincisional glaucoma surgery. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1605. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01815-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar