The Underutilization of Mental Health Care Services in the Lives of People with Blindness or Visual Impairment: A Literature Review on Rehabilitation Factors Toward Provision

References

• World Health Organization. Blindness and visual impairment; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Lundeen EA, Saydah S, Ehrlich JR, Saaddine J. Self-Reported vision impairment and psychological distress in U.S. adults. Ophthal Epidemiol. 2022;29(2):171–181. doi:10.1080/09286586.2021.1918177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi HG, Lee MJ, Lee SM. Visual impairment and risk of depression: a longitudinal follow-up study using a national sample cohort. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2083. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20374-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayro EL, Murchison AP, Hark LA, et al. Prevalence of depressive symptoms and associated factors in an urban, ophthalmic population. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(2):740–747. doi:10.1177/1120672120901701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Bullard KM, Cotch MF, et al. Association between depression and functional vision loss in persons 20 years of age or older in the United States, national health, and nutrition examination survey 2005–2008. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(5):573–581. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.2597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorrami-Nejad M, Sarabandi A, Akbari MR, Askarizadeh F. The impact of visual impairment on quality of life. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2016;5(3):96–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dhital A, Pey T, Stanford MR. Visual loss and falls: a review. Eye. 2010;24(9):1437–1446. doi:10.1038/eye.2010.60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojon-Azzi SM, Sousa-Poza A, Mojon DS. Impact of low vision on well-being in 10 European countries. Ophthalmologica. 2008;222(3):205–212. doi:10.1159/000126085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempen GI, Ballemans J, Ranchor AV, van Rens GH, Zijlstra GA. The impact of low vision on activities of daily living, symptoms of depression, feelings of anxiety and social support in community-living older adults seeking vision rehabilitation services. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(8):1405–1411. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0061-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunes A, B Hansen M, Heir T. Loneliness among adults with visual impairment: prevalence, associated factors, and relationship to life satisfaction. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1):24. doi:10.1186/s12955-019-1096-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brennan M, Horowitz A, Reinhardt JP, Stuen C, Rubio R, Oestreicher N. The societal impact of age-related macular degeneration: use of social support resources differs by the severity of the impairment. J Vis Impairment Blindness. 2011;105(1):5–19. doi:10.1177/0145482X1110500102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong WL, Su X, Li X, et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(2):e106–e116. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70145-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demmin DL, Silverstein SM. Visual impairment and mental health: unmet needs and treatment options. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:4229–4251. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S258783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees G, Tee HW, Marella M, Fenwick E, Dirani M, Lamoureux EL. Vision-Specific distress and depressive symptoms in people with vision impairment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(6):2891–2896. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-5080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou C-F, Beckles GLA, Zhang X, Saaddine JB. Association of socioeconomic position with sensory impairment among us working-aged adults. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(6):1262–1268. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrière I, Delcourt C, Daien V, et al. A prospective study of the bi-directional association between vision loss and depression in the elderly. J Affect Disord. 2013;151(1):164–170. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway EE, Sturrock BA, Lamoureux EL, Keeffe JE, Rees G. Depression screening among older adults attending low-vision rehabilitation and eye-care services: characteristics of those who screen positive and client acceptability of screening. Australas J Ageing. 2015;34(4):229–234. doi:10.1111/ajag.12159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyman SR, Gosney MA, Victor CR. Psychosocial impact of visual impairment in working-age adults. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(11):1427–1431. doi:10.1136/bjo.2009.164814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senra H, Balaskas K, Mahmoodi N, Aslam T. Experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy treatment and clinical levels of depression and anxiety in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;177:213–224. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arluke A, Gritzer G. The Making of Rehabilitation: A Political Economy of Medical Specialization, 1890–1980 (Comparative Studies of Health Systems and Medical Care). University of California Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson E. Literatures of Madness: Disability Studies and Mental Health. Palgrave Macmillan; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hiranandani V. Towards a critical theory of disability in social work. Crit Soc Work. 2019;6(1). doi:10.22329/csw.v6i1.5712
   Google Scholar
• Minich JA. Enabling whom? Critical disability studies now. Lateral. 2016;5(1). doi:10.25158/L5.1.9
   Google Scholar
• Stiker H-J. A History of Disability. University of Michigan Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Jürgen H. The Theory of Communicative Action. A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Beacon Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Ingstad B, Whyte SR. Disability and Culture. University of California Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Basic definition of disability, 20 C.F.R § 404.1505; 1980. Available from: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-20/chapter-III/part-404/subpart-P/subject-group-ECFRd3e28073a44a293/section-404.1505. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Bonaccio S, Connelly CE, Gellatly IR, Jetha A, Martin Ginis KA. The participation of people with disabilities in the workplace across the employment cycle: employer concerns and research evidence. J Bus Psychol. 2020;35(2):135–158. doi:10.1007/s10869-018-9602-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oi WY. Work for Americans with disabilities. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1992;523(1):159–174. doi:10.1177/0002716292523001014
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Labor. Disability resources; 2023. Available from: https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/disability. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. Persons with a disability [Data set]. Labor Force Characteristics. United States Department of Labor; 2023. Available from: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/disabl.pdf. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Workforce Innovation And Opportunity Act of. U.S.C. § 3101 et seq; 2014. Available from: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title29/chapter32&edition=prelim. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Division of Blind Services. Program Manual. Voc Rehab. Available from: https://dbs.fldoe.org/Voc-Rehab/Manual/. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Szasz TS. The Myth of Mental Illness. HarperPerennial; 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Albee GW. To thine own self be true. Am Psychol. 1975;30(12):1156–1158. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.30.12.1156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Anchor Books; 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–136. doi:10.1126/science.847460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow L. Including all of our lives: renewing the social model of disability. In: Barnes C, Mercer G, editors. Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability. Disability Press; 1996:5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Benning TB. No such thing as mental illness? Critical reflections on the major ideas and legacy of Thomas Szasz. BJPsych Bull. 2016;40(6):292–295. doi:10.1192/pb.bp.115.053249
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolfensberger W. The Principle of Normalization in Human Services. National Institute on Mental Retardation; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver M, Barnes C. The New Politics of Disablement. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver M. The Politics of Disablement. Macmillan; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattarai J, Bentley J, Morean W, Wegener ST, Pollack Porter KM. Promoting equity at the population level: putting the foundational principles into practice through disability advocacy. Rehabil Psychol. 2020;65(2):87–100. doi:10.1037/rep0000321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrman D, Papadimitriou C, Green B, LeFlore A, Magasi S. Relationships at work: integrating the perspectives of disability partners to enhance a peer navigation intervention. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022;3(1):876636. doi:10.3389/fresc.2022.876636
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iáñez Domínguez A, González Luna B. Disability in the Spanish press: from the paradigm of rehabilitation to the paradigm of personal autonomy. Commun Soc. 2019;32(1):77–90. doi:10.15581/003.32.1.77-90
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability, and health. IMB Community Foundation; 2001. Available from: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Community based rehabilitation guidelines: CBR: community based rehabilitation. NLM classification: WB 320; 2010. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241548052. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtaiş Y, Oztuna D, Küçükdeveci AA, Kutlay S, Hafiz M, Tennant A. Reliability, construct validity and measurement potential of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF. A comprehensive core set for osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12(255):1–12. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-12-255
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Devoogdt N, Van Kampen M, Geraerts I, Coremans T, Christiaens MR. Lymphoedema functioning, disability, and health questionnaire: reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 2011;91(6):944–957. doi:10.2522/ptj.20100087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinna F, Fiorillo A, Tusconi M, Guiso B, Carpiniello B. Assessment of functioning in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder with the mini-international classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF-Application: a validation study in Italy. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2015;9(37):1–10. doi:10.1186/s13033-015-0030-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva MR, Nobre MI, Carvalho KM, de Montilha R. Visual impairment, rehabilitation and international classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF. Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2014;73(5):291–301. doi:10.5935/0034-7280.20140063
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Mental disorders; 2022. Availabe from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disorders. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T, Kleine I. Educating health professionals about disability: a review of interventions. Health Soc Care Educ. 2013;2(2):20–37. doi:10.11120/hsce.2013.00026
   Google Scholar
• Mueller S, Weintraub L. The workforce innovation and opportunity act of 2014. Plain Language Series. Issue No. 4. University of Massachusetts – Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion; 2020. Available from: https://thinkcollege.net/sites/default/files/files/resources/PL4_WIOA_R.pdf. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Education. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act; 2023. Available from: https://sites.ed.gov/idea/. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Health and Human Services. Programs for people with disabilities; 2023. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/programs/social-services/programs-for-people-with-disabilities/index.html. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Rehabilitation act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq; 1973. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2010-title29/html/USCODE-2010-title29-chap16.htm. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. U.S.C. § 12101 et seq;1990:42. Available from: https://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.htm. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Dean D, Pepper JV, Schmidt R, Stern S. The effects of vocational rehabilitation services for people with mental illness. J Hum Resour. 2017;52(3):826–858. doi:10.3368/jhr.52.3.0114-6111R1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crudden A, Steverson A. Job retention: perspectives of individuals with blindness and low vision. J Vocat Rehabil. 2022;57(2):127–140. doi:10.3233/JVR-221204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce I, Baker M. Segmenting and targeting employed and unemployed people with sight problems. Int Congr S. 2005;1282:1125–1129. doi:10.1016/j.ics.2005.05.054
   Google Scholar
• Crudden A, Steverson AC. Job retention and career advancement: a survey of persons who are blind or have low vision. J Rehabil. 2021;87(2):28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Papakonstantinou D. Person-Related factors of people with disabilities affecting employers’ attitudes toward their vocational integration: a literature review of the top list. J Rehabil. 2022;88(2):11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Annual disability statistics compendium. Vocational rehabilitation—number of participants served, number of cases closed with and without employment by State Agency: 2016 [Data set]; 2021. Available from: https://disabilitycompendium.org/compendium/2021-annual-disability-statistics-compendium-A?page=19. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Paul S, Rafal M, Houtenville A. Annual Disability Statistics Compendium: 2021 (Table 14.1). University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener WR, Welsh RL, Blasch BB. Foundations of Orientation and Mobility. AFB Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• University of Alabama in Huntsville. Orientation and mobility concentration; 2023. Available from: https://www.uah.edu/education/departments/curriculum-and-instruction/graduate-programs/master-of-education/orientation-and-mobility-concentration. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Academy for Certification of Vision Rehabilitation and Education Professionals. Certifications; 2023. Available from: https://www.acvrep.org/certifications/landing. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Keay LJ, Chang KJ, Angell B, Rogers K, Jan S. Cost-benefit analysis of orientation and mobility programs for adults with vision disability: a contingent valuation study. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;45(5):857–865. doi:10.1080/09638288.2022.2044523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Federation of the Blind. Blindness statistics; 2019. Available from: https://nfb.org/resources/blindness-statistics. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Virgili G, Rubin G. Orientation and mobility training for adults with low vision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2010(5):1–23. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003925.pub3
   Google Scholar
• Fixsen A, Seers H, Polley M, Robins J. Applying critical systems thinking to social prescribing: a relational model of stakeholder “buy-in. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):580. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05443-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cmar JL, McDonnall MC. Characteristics, services, and outcomes of vocational rehabilitation consumers who are deaf-blind. J Am Deafness Rehabil Assoc. 2019;52(2):12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. Counselor policy manual. Rehab Works; 2018. Available from: https://www.rehabworks.org/_resources/docs/policies/manual/counselor-policy-manual.pdf. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Social Security Administration. Vocational rehabilitation providers’ handbook. Social Security Administration; 2020. Available from: https://yourtickettowork.ssa.gov/Assets/yttw/docs/vocational-rehabilitation/VR-Providers-Handbook-2020.pdf. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Bertalanffy LV. General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller Inc; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Slusser MM, García Luis I, Reed C-R, McGinnis PQ. Foundations of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in Health Care. Elsevier; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfellow EJ. Applying structural systems thinking to frame perspectives on social work innovation. Res Soc Work Pract. 2017;27(2):154–162. doi:10.1177/1049731516660850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies DA. Nursing Management: A Systems Approach. W B Saunders; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. List of official ICD-10 updates ratified. World Health Organization; 2006 [ cited February 17, 2024]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/icd-10-updates-2006. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Meaning of blindness as defined in the law, 20 C.F.R. § 404.1581; 1980. Available from: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-20/section-404.1581. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Guerette AR, Smedema SM. The relationship of perceived social support with well-being in adults with visual impairments. J Vis Impairment Blindness. 2011;105(7):425–439. doi:10.1177/0145482X1110500705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson CA, Hergenrather K, Jones WD. Empowering community voices: the influences of consumer race, disability, and poverty on public vocational rehabilitation service engagement. J Rehabil. 2021;87(1):40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgeois P, Green K, Hartley M, White M, Clarke B. Moral distress within rehabilitation counseling. Rehabil Res Policy Educ. 2021;35(2):117–128. doi:10.1891/RE-20-08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesen JM, Hierholzer A. Vocational rehabilitation services and employment for social security disability income beneficiaries with visual impairments. J Vocat Rehabil. 2016;44(2):175–189. doi:10.3233/JVR-150789
   Google Scholar
• Clapp CM, Pepper JV, Schmidt R, Stern S. Overview of vocational rehabilitation data about people with visual impairments: demographics, services, and long-run labor market trends. J Vis Impairment Blindness. 2020;114(1):43–56. doi:10.1177/0145482X20901380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnall MC, Lund EM. Employers’ intent to hire people who are blind or visually impaired: a test of the theory of planned behavior. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2019;63(4):206–215. doi:10.1177/0034355219893061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata MA. An exploratory study of general self-efficacy and employment in adults with retinitis pigmentosa. J Vis Impairment Blindness. 2020a;114(1):18–30. doi:10.1177/0145482X19900715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata MA. Disability affirmation predicts employment among adults with visual impairment and blindness. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2020b;65(2):120–128. doi:10.1177/0034355220957107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata MA. Mobility tool use relates to disability affirmation among adults with visual impairments. J Vis Impairment Blindness. 2021;115(5):382–392. doi:10.1177/0145482X211046684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata MA. Group identity in blindness groups predicts life satisfaction and lower anxiety and depression. Rehabil Psychol. 2022;67(1):42–52. doi:10.1037/rep0000432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata MA, Pearlstein JG. Disability self‐worth relates to lower anxiety and depression in people with visual impairment. J Clin Psychol. 2022;78(7):1491–1499. doi:10.1002/jclp.23308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnall MC, Cmar JL, McKnight Z. What predicts job quality of vocational rehabilitation consumers who are blind or have low vision? Rehabil Couns Bull. 2021;66(2):100–111. doi:10.1177/00343552211060012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund EM, Cmar JL. Factors related to employment outcomes for vocational rehabilitation consumers with visual impairments: a systematic review. J Vis Impairment Blindness. 2019;113(6):518–537. doi:10.1177/0145482X19885277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos K, Papakonstantinou D, Koutsoklenis A, Koustriava E, Kouderi V. Social support, social networks, and happiness of individuals with visual impairments. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2015;58(4):240–249. doi:10.1177/0034355214535471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnall MC, Cmar JL, McKnight ZS. Beyond employment rates: self-employment and other categories of work among people with visual impairments. J Vis Impair Blind. 2022;116(5):729–735. doi:10.1177/0145482X221128831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papakonstantinou D, Papadopoulos K. Forms of social support in the workplace for individuals with visual impairments. J Vis Impairment Blindness. 2010;104(3):183–187. doi:10.1177/0145482X1010400306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodabakhshi Koolaee A, Mosalanejad L, Mamaghanirad B. The effectiveness of group training of choice theory on quality of life and hope in blind people. Iran Rehabil J. 2017;15(3):199–206. doi:10.29252/nrip.irj.15.3.199
   Google Scholar
• Haegele JA, Zhu X, Healy S. Behavioral correlates of depression among adults with visual impairments. J Vis Impairment Blindness. 2021;115(5):403–413. doi:10.1177/0145482X211046696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes. 1991;50(2):179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin SE, Chan F, Bishop M, Miller SM. Psychometric validation of the sense of well-being inventory for program evaluation in rehabilitation. Prof Rehabil. 2003;11(2):54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Cimarolli VR, Boerner K. Social support and well-being in adults who are visually impaired. J Vis Impairment Blindness. 2005;99(9):521–534. doi:10.1177/0145482X0509900904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberg S, Ajzen I, Schmidt P. Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: the roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic Appl Soc Psychol. 2003;25(3):175–187. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2503_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suntornsan S, Chudech S, Janmaimool P. The role of the theory of planned behavior in explaining the energy-saving behaviors of high school students with physical impairments. Behav Sci. 2022;12(9):334. doi:10.3390/bs12090334
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagger MS, Hamilton K. Longitudinal tests of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2023;1–57. doi:10.1080/10463283.2023.2225897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn DS, Burcaw S. Disability identity: exploring narrative accounts of disability. Rehabil Psychol. 2013;58(2):148–157. doi:10.1037/a0031691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam M. Conceptualizing disability: developing a framework for political disability identity. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2005;16(3):188–198. doi:10.1177/10442073050160030601
   Google Scholar
• Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Löwe B. An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the patient health questionnaire-4. Psychosomatics. 2009;50(6):613–621. doi:10.1176/appi.psy.50.6.613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan F, Wang -C-C, Fitzgerald S, Muller V, Ditchman N, Menz F. Personal, environmental, and service-delivery determinants of employment quality for state vocational rehabilitation consumers: a multilevel analysis. J Vocat Rehabil. 2016;45(1):5–18. doi:10.3233/JVR-160806
   Google Scholar
• McDonnall MC, Cmar J. Employment outcomes and job quality of vocational rehabilitation consumers with deaf-blindness. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2019;63(1):13–24. doi:10.1177/0034355218769461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnall MC, Cmar JL, McKnight ZS. Service factors and personal characteristics associated with employment and job quality for vocational rehabilitation consumers with combined traumatic brain injury and visual impairment. J Vocat Rehabil. 2020;52(3):223–238. doi:10.3233/JVR-201073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameton A. Nursing Practice: The Ethical Issues. Prentice Hall; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer J, Gushwa M. Going Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Power, Antiracism DEIPAR Deeper: Developing and Incorporating a Social Justice Curricular Framework [ Manuscript submitted for publication]. DSW Program, Simmons University; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Arsel Z, Crockett D, Scott ML. Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the journal of consumer research: a curation and research agenda. J Con Res. 2022;48(5):920–933. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucab057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasser W. Choice Theory. HaperCollins Publishers; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• The WHOQOL Group. The Development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (the WHOQOL). In: Orley J, Kuyken W, editors. Quality of Life Assessment. International Perspectives. Springer; 1994. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-79123-9_4
   Google Scholar
• Walsh T. A right to inclusion? Homelessness, human rights and social exclusion. Aust J Hum Rights. 2006;12(1):185–204. doi:10.1080/1323238X.2006.11910818
   Google Scholar
• Lievrouw L. Alternative and Activist New Media. Polity Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda SM, Young AG, Yetgin E. Are social media emancipatory or hegemonic? Societal effects of mass media digitization in the Case of the SOPA Discourse. MIS Q. 2016;40(2):303–329. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.2.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein CR. The law of group polarization. J Pol Philos. 2002;10(2):175–195. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiernan MA, Mitchell BG, Russo PL. The power of podcasts: exploring the endless possibilities of audio education and information in medicine, healthcare epidemiology, and antimicrobial stewardship. Antimicrob Stewardship Healthc Epidemiol. 2023;3(1):e98, 1–3. doi:10.1017/ash.2023.178
   Google Scholar
• Tobin SJ, Guadagno RE. Why people listen: motivations and outcomes of podcast listening. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0265806. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland D, Thoma B, Tagg A, Woods J, Chan TM, Riddell J. What are the real-world podcast-listening habits of medical professionals? Cureus. 2021;13(7):e16240, 1–9. doi:10.7759/cureus.16240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horkheimer M. Traditional and Critical Theory. Continuum; 1937.
   Google Scholar
• Belkin-Martinez D. The liberation health model: theory and practice. In: Belkin Martinez D, Fleck-Henderson A, editors. Social Justice in Clinical Practice: A Liberation Health Framework for Social Work. Routledge; 2014:9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hall MC. Critical disability theory. Stanford Encycl Philos. Metaphysics Research Laboratory, Stanford University; 2019. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/disability-critical/. Accessed July 17, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Schalk S. Critical disability studies as methodology. Lateral. 2017;6(1):1–4. doi:10.25158/L6.1.13
   Google Scholar
• Onedera JD, Greenwalt B. Choice theory: an interview with Dr. William Glasser. Fam J. 2007;15(1):79–86. doi:10.1177/1066480706294150
   Google Scholar
• Kondrat ME. Actor-Centered social work: re-Visioning “person-in-environment” through a critical theory lens. Soc Work. 2002;47(4):435–448. doi:10.1093/sw/47.4.435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams M. Readings for Diversity and Social Justice [Introduction]. Castañeda C, Hackman H, Peters M, Zúñiga X, Blumenfeld W, editors. Routledge; 2010:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Adams M, Castañeda C, Hackman H, Peters M, Zúñiga X, Blumenfeld W. Readings for Diversity and Social Justice. Routledge; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hardiman R, Jackson B, Griffin P. Conceptual foundations for social justice education. In: Adams M, Bell L, Griffin P, editors. Teaching for Diversity and Social Justice. Routledge; 2007:35–66.
   Google Scholar
• Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford P. Radical social work and service users: a crucial connection. In: Lavalette M, editor. Radical Social Work Today: Social Work at the Crossroads. Policy Press; 2011:95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Burton M, Kagan C. Liberation social psychology: learning from Latin America. Community Appl Soc Psy. 2005;15(1):63–78. doi:10.1002/casp.786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire P. Education as the practice of freedom. In: Freire P, editor. Education for Critical Consciousness. Continuum; 1974:1–78.
   Google Scholar
• Forber-Pratt AJ, Mueller CO, Andrews EE. Disability identity and allyship in rehabilitation psychology: sit, stand, sign, and show up. Rehabil Psychol. 2019;64(2):119–129. doi:10.1037/rep0000256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulnik ST, Nikoletou D. A qualitative study of views on disability and expectations from community rehabilitation service users. Health Soc Care Community. 2017;25(1):43–53. doi:10.1111/hsc.12180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebolledo-Sanhueza J, Besoain-Saldaña Á, Manríquez-Hizaut M, Huepe-Ortega G, Aliaga-Castillo V. Experiencias y percepciones sobre discapacidad y participación social en centros de rehabilitación comunitaria de Chile. Saúde Soc. 2021;30(2):1–10. doi:10.1590/s0104-12902021200858
   Google Scholar
• Brooks NA. Self-empowerment among adults with severe physical disability: a case study. J Sociol Soc Welf. 1991;18(1):105–120. doi:10.15453/0191-5096.1971
   Google Scholar
• Brzuzy S. Deconstructing disability. J Pover. 1997;1(1):81–91. doi:10.1300/J134v01n01_06
   Google Scholar
• Quinn P. Social work education and disability. J Teach Soc Work. 1996;12(1–2):55–71. doi:10.1300/J067v12n01_05
   Google Scholar
• Hahn H. Paternalism and public policy. Society. 1983;20(3):36–46. doi:10.1007/BF02700073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackelprang RW, Salsgiver RO. People with disabilities and social work: historical and contemporary issues. Soc Work. 1996;41(1):7–14. doi:10.1093/sw/41.1.7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant JD. Becoming a liberation health social worker. In: Martinez DB, editor. Social Justice in Clinical Practice: A Liberation Health Framework for Social Work. Routledge; 2014:29–43.
   Google Scholar
• Moya P. What’s identity got to do with it? Mobilizing identities in the multicultural classroom. In: Alcoff LM, Hames-Garcia M, Mohanty SP, editors. Identity Politics Reconsidered. Palgrave Macmillan; 2006:96–117.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton JI. Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment. University of California Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Davis D, Evans M, Jadad A, et al. The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ. 2003;327(7405):33–35. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber J, Perry S, Downey P, Williamson A. Knowledge translation outcomes following innovative continuing education. J Phys Ther Educ. 2015;29(4):42–51. doi:10.1097/00001416-201529040-00007
   Google Scholar
• Rappolt S, Tassone M. How rehabilitation therapists gather, evaluate, and implement new knowledge. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002;22(3):170–180. doi:10.1002/chp.1340220306
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ketelaar M, Russell DJ, Gorter JW. The challenge of moving evidence-based measures into clinical practice: lessons in knowledge translation. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2008;28(2):191–206. doi:10.1080/01942630802192610
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor JM, Neimeyer GJ. The development of the professional competencies scale: foundational, functional, and continuing competencies. Train Educ Prof Psychol. 2022;16(2):112–120. doi:10.1037/tep0000383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhanga U, Chen W, Minor S, et al. Promoting transfer of learning to practice in online continuing professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2022;42(4):269–273. doi:10.1097/CEH.0000000000000393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucsera JV, Zimmaro DM. Comparing the effectiveness of intensive and traditional courses. Coll Technol. 2010;58(2):62–68. doi:10.1080/87567550903583769
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey A, Lovarini M. Providing education on evidence-based practice improved knowledge but did not change behavior: a before and after study. BMC Med Educ. 2005;5:40. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-5-40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Pajares F, Urdan T, editors. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. Information Age Publishing; 2006:307–337.
   Google Scholar
• Web accessibility initiative. Web content accessibility guidelines WCAG 2.2; 2023. Available rom: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/. Accessed March 22, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgois P, Holmes SM, Sue K, Quesada J. Structural vulnerability: operationalizing the concept to address health disparities in clinical care. Acad Med. 2017;92(3):299–307. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar