136
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CLINICAL TRIAL REPORT

The Significance of Dry Eye Signs on Preoperative Keratometry Measurements in Patients Scheduled for Cataract Surgery

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 151-161 | Received 17 Nov 2023, Accepted 08 Jan 2024, Published online: 16 Jan 2024

References

  • Davis G. The evolution of cataract surgery. Mo Med. 2016;113(1):58–62.
  • Jaycock P, Johnston RL, Taylor H, et al. The cataract national dataset electronic multi-centre audit of 55,567 operations: updating benchmark standards of care in the United Kingdom and internationally. Eye. 2009;23(1):38–49. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6703015
  • Ferreira TB, Hoffer KJ, Ribeiro F, Ribeiro P, O’Neill JG, Vavvas DG. Ocular biometric measurements in cataract surgery candidates in Portugal. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0184837. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184837
  • Sella R, Chou L, Schuster AK, Gali HE, Weinreb RN, Afshari NA. Accuracy of IOL power calculations in the very elderly. Eye. 2020;34(10):1848–1855. doi:10.1038/s41433-019-0752-0
  • Behndig A, Montan P, Stenevi U, Kugelberg M, Zetterström C, Lundström M. Aiming for emmetropia after cataract surgery: Swedish National Cataract Register study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(7):1181–1186. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.02.035
  • Alio JL, Grzybowski A, El Aswad A, Romaniuk D. Refractive lens exchange. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014;59(6):579–598. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.04.004
  • Moshirfar M, Thomson AC, Thomson RJ, Martheswaran T, McCabe SE. Refractive enhancements for residual refractive error after cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2021;32(1):54–61. doi:10.1097/icu.0000000000000717
  • Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(3):368–376. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.031
  • Kane JX, Chang DF. Intraocular lens power formulas, biometry, and intraoperative aberrometry: a review. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(11):e94–e114. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.010
  • Savini G, Di Maita M, Hoffer KJ, et al. Comparison of 13 formulas for IOL power calculation with measurements from partial coherence interferometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105(4):484–489. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316193
  • Fam HB, Lim KL. Improving refractive outcomes at extreme axial lengths with the IOLMaster: the optical axial length and keratometric transformation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(5):678–683. doi:10.1136/bjo.2008.148452
  • Reitblat O, Gali HE, Chou L, et al. Intraocular lens power calculation in the elderly population using the Kane formula in comparison with existing methods. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(11):1501–1507. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000308
  • Epitropoulos AT, Matossian C, Berdy GJ, Malhotra RP, Potvin R. Effect of tear osmolarity on repeatability of keratometry for cataract surgery planning. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(8):1672–1677. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.016
  • Gjerdrum B, Gundersen KG, Lundmark PO, Aakre BM. Repeatability of OCT-based versus scheimpflug- and reflection-based keratometry in patients with hyperosmolar and normal tear film. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:3991–4003. doi:10.2147/opth.S280868
  • Doğan A, Gürdal C, Köylü MT. Does dry eye affect repeatability of corneal topography measurements? Turk J Ophthalmol. 2018;48(2):57–60. doi:10.4274/tjo.10179
  • Kieval JZ, Al-Hashimi S, Davidson RS, et al. Prevention and management of refractive prediction errors following cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(8):1189–1197. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000269
  • Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):276–283. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008
  • Osmolarity Tests Cards. Instructions for Use. TearLab; 2016.
  • Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, et al. TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):539–574. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.001
  • Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003;22(7):640–650. doi:10.1097/00003226-200310000-00008
  • Oculus Optikergerate. Oculus Keratograph 5M User Guide.Wetzlar, Germany;2017.
  • Hagg-Streit Diagnostics. EYESTAR 900¨manual. Available from: https://haag-streit.com/2%20Products/Speciality%20diagnostics/Biometry/Eyestar%20900/Instructions%20for%20use/1500_7220686_04030_IFU_EYESTAR_900_01_en_web.pdf. Accessed 13 January 2024.
  • Gjerdrum B, Gundersen KG, Nilsen C, Gundersen M, Jensen P. Refractive predictability and biometry agreement of a combined swept source optical coherence and reflectometry biometer compared to an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and an SS-OCT biometer. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:1439–1452. doi:10.2147/opth.S408685
  • Barboza MN, Barboza GN, de Melo GM, et al. [Correlation between signals and symptoms of dry eye in Sjögren’s syndrome patients] Correlação entre sinais e sintomas de olho seco em pacientes portadores da síndrome de Sjögren. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008;71(4):547–552. Portuguese. doi:10.1590/s0004-27492008000400015
  • Graae Jensen P, Gundersen M, Nilsen C, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among individuals scheduled for cataract surgery in a Norwegian cataract clinic. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:1233–1243. doi:10.2147/opth.S407805
  • Lee JH, Kim CH, Choe CM, Choi TH. Correlation analysis between ocular surface parameters with subjective symptom severity in dry eye disease. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020;34(3):203–209. doi:10.3341/kjo.2019.0133
  • Hashemi H, Yekta A, Shokrollahzadeh F, et al. The distribution of keratometry in a population based study. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2021;33(1):17–22. doi:10.1016/j.joco.2019.06.004
  • Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(5):472–485. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00879.x
  • Willcox MDP, Argüeso P, Georgiev GA, et al. TFOS DEWS II tear film report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):366–403. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.03.006
  • Bron AJ, de Paiva CS, Chauhan SK, et al. TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):438–510. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.011