Characterization of Corneal Biomechanics Using CORVIS ST Device in Different Grades of Myopia in a Sample of Middle Eastern Ethnicity

References

• Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036‐42. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. A quality of life comparison of people wearing spectacles or contact lenses or having undergone refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2006;22(1):19‐27. doi:10.3928/1081-597X-20060101-07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shams N, Mobaraki H, Kamali M, Jafarzadehpour E. Comparison of quality of life between myopic patients with spectacles and contact lenses, and patients who have undergone refractive surgery. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2015;27(1–2):32‐6. doi:10.1016/j.joco.2015.10.004
   Google Scholar
• Long Q, Wang JY, Xu D, Li Y. Comparison of corneal biomechanics in Sjögren’s syndrome and non‐Sjogren’s syndrome dry eyes by scheimpflug based device. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(5):711‐6. doi:10.18240/ijo.2017.05.08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):156‐62. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Zheng L, Zhao X, Xu Y, Chen S. Corneal biomechanics after small‐incision lenticule extraction versus Q‐value‐guided femtosecond laser‐assisted in situ keratomileusis. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016;28:181‐7. doi:10.1016/j.joco.2016.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Lazreg S, Mesplié N, Praud D, et al. Comparison of corneal thickness and biomechanical properties between North African and French patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(3):425‐30. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Herber R, Wang Y. Corneal biomechanics differences between Chinese and Caucasian healthy subjects. Front Med. 2022;9:834663. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.834663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilmi MR, Musa NH, Khairidzan MK, et al. Changes In Apical Corneal Curvature In Unilateral Primary Pterygium And Normal Adults Using Simulated-K And Corneal Irregularity Measurement. Int J Allied Health Sci. 2019;3(2):588–594.
   Google Scholar
• Che Arif FA, Hilmi MR, Kamal MK, et al. Comparison of Immediate Effects on Usage of Dual Polymer Artificial Tears on Changes in Tear Film Characteristics. Malaysian J Med Health Sci. 2021;17(3):252–258.
   Google Scholar
• Tang SM, Ma L, Lu SY, et al. Association of the PAX6 gene with extreme myopia rather than lower grade myopias. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(4):570–574. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedaghat MR, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Heravian J, et al. Detection ability of corneal biomechanical parameters for early diagnosis of ectasia. Eye (Lond)).2022;37:1665–1672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flockerzi E, Xanthopoulou K, Daas L, et al. Evaluation of Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters and the Biomechanical E-Staging After Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking in Keratoconus. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2022;11(6):514–520. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou K, Seitz B, Belin MW, et al. Reliability analysis of successive Corvis ST(R) measurements in keratoconus 2 years after accelerated corneal crosslinking compared to untreated keratoconus corneas. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;261(4):1055–1061. doi:10.1007/s00417-022-05881-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee R, Chang RT, Wong IYH, et al. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in myopes and emmetropes using the Corvis ST. Clin Exp Optom. 2016;99(2):157–162. doi:10.1111/cxo.12341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Wang W, Ding H, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in high myopia measured by dynamic scheimpflug imaging technology. Optom Vis Sci. 2017;94(12):1074‐80. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenia VP, Kenia RV, Pirdankar OH. Association between corneal biomechanical parameters and myopic refractive errors in young Indian individuals. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2020;10(1):45–53. doi:10.4103/tjo.tjo_15_19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han F, Li M, Wei P, et al. Effect of biomechanical properties on myopia: a study of new corneal biomechanical parameters. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):459. doi:10.1186/s12886-020-01729-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu Z, Ren Q, Chen M, et al. The relationship between axial length/corneal radius of curvature ratio and stress-strain index in myopic eyeballs: using Corvis ST tonometry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:939129. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.939129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao R, Ren Y, Li S, et al. Assessment of corneal biomechanics in anisometropia using Scheimpflug technology. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:994353. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.994353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu LL, Hu XJ, Yang Y, et al. Correlation of myopia onset and progression with corneal biomechanical parameters in children. World J Clin Cases. 2022;10:1548–1556. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v10.i5.1548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedaghat MR, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Azimi A, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in varying severities of myopia. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:595330. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.595330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Pang C, Ming S, et al. Effect of myopia and astigmatism deepening on the corneal biomechanical parameter stress strain index in individuals of Chinese ethnicity. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:1018653. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.1018653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, Rong H, Zhang P, et al. The effect of axial length elongation on corneal biomechanical property. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:777239. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.777239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Li Y, Jin Y, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in myopic eyes measured by a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:161869. doi:10.1155/2015/161869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long W, Zhao Y, Hu Y, et al. Characteristics of corneal biomechanics in Chinese preschool children with different refractive status. Cornea. 2019;38(11):1395–1399. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li DL, Liu MX, Yin ZJ, et al. Refractive associations with corneal biomechanical properties among young adults: a population-based Corvis ST study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023. doi:10.1007/s00417-023-06164-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Ding H, He H, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in healthy children measured by corneal visualization scheimpflug technology. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1):70. doi:10.1186/s12886-017-0463-x
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, He M, He H, Zhang C, Jin H, Zhong X. Corneal biomechanical metrics of healthy Chinese adults using Corvis ST. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40(2):97–103. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2016.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Ambrosio RJ, Elsheikh A, et al. Detection of Keratoconus with a new biomechanical index. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(12):803–810. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160629-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasy A, Chen KJ, Vinciguerra R, et al. Ex-vivo experimental validation of biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure measurements on human eyes using the CorVis ST. Exp Eye Res. 2018;175:98–102. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2018.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrósio R, Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, et al. Integration of scheimpflug based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(7):434–443. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170426-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Wang Y, Xie L, et al. The Relationship between Corneal Biomechanics and Corneal Shape in Normal Myopic Eyes. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;4(03):278. doi:10.4172/2155-9570.1000278
   Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Marshall J. A review of corneal biomechanics: mechanisms for measurement and the implications for refractive surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(12):2679–2690. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_2146_20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar