Advanced search
Publication Cover
Clinical Ophthalmology Volume 18, 2024 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
100
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Evaluation of Fundus Image Interpretation Accuracy in Glaucoma Screening Among Different Physician Groups

Chiharu Wada-Koike1 Department of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanView further author information
,
Ryo Terauchi1 Department of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanView further author information
,
Kota Fukai2 Department of Preventive Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, JapanView further author information
,
Kei Sano1 Department of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanView further author information
,
Euido Nishijima1 Department of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanView further author information
,
Koji Komatsu1 Department of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanView further author information
,
Kyoko Ito3 Centre for Preventive Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanView further author information
,
Tomohiro Kato3 Centre for Preventive Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5878-5320View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Masayuki Tatemichi2 Department of Preventive Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, JapanView further author information
,
Yoshiaki Kabata4 Department of Ophthalmology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Daisan Hospital, Tokyo, JapanCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-5819-1126View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Tadashi Nakano1 Department of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3184-1991View further author information
ORCID Icon show all
Pages 583-589 | Received 06 Dec 2023, Accepted 19 Feb 2024, Published online: 26 Feb 2024

References

  • Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(11):844–851.
  • Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–2090. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
  • Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1641–1648. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.029
  • Yamada M, Hiratsuka Y, Nakano T, et al. Detection of glaucoma and other vision-threatening ocular diseases in the population recruited at specific health checkups in Japan. Clin Epidemiol. 2020;12:1381–1388. doi:10.2147/clep.S273016
  • Ikeda N, Saito E, Kondo N, et al. What has made the population of Japan healthy? Lancet. 2011;378(9796):1094–1105. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61055-6
  • Terauchi R, Wada T, Fukai K, et al. Age-related changes in intraocular pressure: japan ningen dock study. J Glaucoma. 2022;31(12):927–934. doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000002115
  • Terauchi R, Wada T, Ogawa S, et al. FDT perimetry for glaucoma detection in comprehensive health checkup service. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:4687398. doi:10.1155/2020/4687398
  • Abrams LS, Scott IU, Spaeth GL, Quigley HA, Varma R. Agreement among optometrists, ophthalmologists, and residents in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(10):1662–1667. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31118-3
  • Rossetto JD, Melo Jr LAS, Campos MS, Tavares IM. Agreement on the evaluation of glaucomatous optic nerve head findings by ophthalmology residents and a glaucoma specialist. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1281–1284. doi:10.2147/opth.S140225
  • Watanabe T, Hiratsuka Y, Kita Y, et al. Combining optical coherence tomography and fundus photography to improve glaucoma screening. Diagnostics. 2022;12(5):1.
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
  • Joseph S, Rajan RP, Sundar B, Venkatachalam S, Kempen JH, Kim R. Validation of diagnostic accuracy of retinal image grading by trained non-ophthalmologist grader for detecting diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. Eye. 2023;37(8):1577–1582. doi:10.1038/s41433-022-02190-4
  • Coan LJ, Williams BM, Krishna Adithya V, et al. Automatic detection of glaucoma via fundus imaging and artificial intelligence: a review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2023;68(1):17–41. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.08.005
  • Fukai K, Terauchi R, Noro T, et al. Real-time risk score for glaucoma mass screening by spectral domain optical coherence tomography: development and validation. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022;11(8):8. doi:10.1167/tvst.11.8.8
  • Tatemichi M, Nakano T. Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134(4):529–537. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01684-7
  • Arai K, Nishijima E, Ogawa S, et al. A novel visual field screening program for glaucoma with a head-mounted perimeter. J Glaucoma. 2023;32(6):520–525. doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000002199

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.