64
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Pre-Cycloplegic Exam Benefit of Photoscreening and Accommodation-Relaxing Skiascopy

& ORCID Icon
Pages 833-846 | Received 11 Dec 2023, Accepted 21 Feb 2024, Published online: 18 Mar 2024

References

  • Wallace DK, Morse CL, Melia M, et al. Pediatric eye evaluations preferred practice pattern(R): I. Vision Screening in the Primary Care and Community Setting; II. Comprehensive Ophthalmic Examination. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(1):P184–P227.
  • Silbert DI, Matta NS, Andersen K. Plusoptix photoscreening may replace cycloplegic examination in select pediatric ophthalmology patients. J AAPOS. 2013;17(2):163–165. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.11.008
  • Eibschitz-Tsimhoni M, Friedman T, Naor J, Eibschitz N, Friedman Z. Early screening for amblyogenic risk factors lowers the prevalence and severity of amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2000;4(4):194–199. doi:10.1067/mpa.2000.105274
  • VIPS. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the vision in preschoolers study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(4):637–650. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.01.022
  • Guyton DL, O’Connor GM. Dynamic retinoscopy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1991;2(1):78–80. doi:10.1097/00055735-199102000-00012
  • Borish IM. Dynamic Skiametry. In: Borish IM, editor. Clinical Refraction. 3 ed. The Professional Press, Inc; 1970:697–713.
  • Bobier WR, Braddick OJ. Eccentric photorefraction: optical analysis and empirical measures. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985;62(9):614–620. doi:10.1097/00006324-198509000-00006
  • Kaakinen K. Simultaneous two flash static photoskiascopy. A simple method for screening of children with strabismus or high refractive errors by simultaneous static photographic skiascopy of the horizontal and vertical Meridian of both eyes and the documentation of the corneal and fundus reflexes in one photograph. Acta Ophthalmol. 1981;59(3):378–386.
  • Freedman H, Preston K. Polaroid photoscreening for amblyogenic factors. An improved technology. Ophthalmol. 1992;99(12):1785–1795. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31722-1
  • Angi MR, Pucci V, Forattini F, Formentin PA. Results of photorefractometric screening for amblyogenic defects in children aged 20 months. Behav Brain Res. 1992;49(1):91–97. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(05)80198-6
  • Arnold RW, Donahue SP, Silbert DI, et al. Uniform guidelines for pediatric vision screen validation 2021. J AAPOS. 2022;26(1):1.e1–1.e6. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.09.009
  • Levitt AH, Martin SJ, Arnold RW. Performance of glow-fixation GCK and 2WIN photoscreeners and Retinomax to uncover hyperopia. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:2237–2244. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S256991
  • Zhao L, Wen Q, Nasrazadani D, et al. Refractive accuracy and visual outcome by self-refraction using adjustable-focus spectacles in young children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023;141(9):853–860. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.3508
  • Miller JM. Clinical applications of power vectors. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(6):599–602. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a6a211
  • Arnold R, Martin SJ, Beveridge JR, et al. Ellipsoid spectacle comparison of PlusoptiX, Retinomax and 2WIN autorefractors. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:3637–3648. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S326680
  • Arnold RW, Beveridge JS, Martin SJ, Beveridge NR, Metzger EJ, Smith KA. Grading sphero-cylinder spectacle similarity. Clin Optom. 2021;13:23–32. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S289770
  • Chiu NN, Rosenfield M, Wong LC. Effect of contralateral fog during refractive error assessment. J Am Optom Assoc. 1997;68(5):305–308.
  • Bigsby W, Gruber J, Rosner J. Static retinoscopy results with and without a fogging lens over the non-tested eye. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984;61(12):769–770. doi:10.1097/00006324-198412000-00012
  • Arnold AW, Arnold SL, Sprano JH, Arnold RW. School bus accommodation-relaxing skiascopy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1841–1851. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S219031
  • Arnold RW. Digital values for alpha acuities. JPOS. 2021;58(2):132–135. doi:10.3928/01913913-20210111-02
  • Arnold RW, Silbert DI, Modjesky H. Instrument referral criteria for Plusoptix, SPOT and 2WIN targeting 2021 AAPOS guidelines. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:489–505. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S342666
  • Donahue SP, Arthur B, Neely DE, Arnold RW, Silbert D, Ruben JB. Guidelines for automated preschool vision screening: a 10-year, evidence-based update. J AAPOS. 2013;17(1):4–8. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.09.012
  • Donahue S, Arnold R, Ruben JB. Preschool vision screening: what should we be detecting and how should we report it? Uniform guidelines for reporting results from studies of preschool vision screening. J AAPOS. 2003;7(5):314–316. doi:10.1016/S1091-8531(03)00182-4
  • Rosenbaum AL, Bateman JB, Bremer DL, Liu PY. Cycloplegic refraction in esotropic children. Cyclopentolate versus atropine. Ophthalmology. 1981;88(10):1031–1034. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(81)80032-2
  • Turull-Mallofre A, Garcia-Guerra CE, Mestre C, Vilaseca M, Pujol J, Aldaba M. Influence of power and the time of application of fogging lenses on accommodation. Biomed Opt Express. 2023;14(10):5488–5498. doi:10.1364/BOE.486442
  • Musa MJ, Zeppieri M. Principles and technique of fogging during subjective refraction. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
  • Esteves Leandro J, Meira J, Ferreira CS, et al. Adequacy of the fogging test in the detection of clinically significant hyperopia in school-aged children. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:3267151. doi:10.1155/2019/3267151
  • Al-Thawabieh W, Al-Omari R, Abu-Hassan DW, Abuawwad MT, Al-Awadhi A, Abu Serhan H. Tropicamide versus cyclopentolate for cycloplegic refraction in pediatric patients with brown irides: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2023;257:218–226. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2023.09.022
  • Kizilay O, Akarsu Acar OP, Celik G. İki Farklı El Tipi Taşınabilir Otorefraktometre ile Pediatrik Yaş Grubunda Yapılan Sikloplejili ve Sikloplejisiz Refraksiyon Ölçümlerinin Karşılaştırılması: kesitsel, Gözlemsel Araştırma [Comparison of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction measurements in pediatric patients obtained with two different hand-held portable autorefractometers: cross-sectional, observational research]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol. 2024;33(1):15–21. Turkish.
  • Wang D, Jin N, Pei RX, et al. Comparison between two autorefractor performances in large scale vision screening in Chinese school age children. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020;13(10):1660–1666. doi:10.18240/ijo.2020.10.22
  • Gil A, Hernandez CS, Perez-Merino P, et al. Assessment of the QuickSee wavefront autorefractor for characterizing refractive errors in school-age children. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240933. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240933
  • Racano E, Alessi S, Pertile R. Comparison of 2Win and plusoptiX A12R refractometers with Retinomax handheld autorefractor keratometer. J AAPOS. 2019;23(5):276 e1–276 e5. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2019.05.017
  • Fledelius HC, Bangsgaard R, Slidsborg C, laCour M. The usefulness of the Retinomax autorefractor for childhood screening validated against a Danish preterm cohort examined at the age of 4 years. Eye. 2015;29(6):742–747. doi:10.1038/eye.2015.14
  • Maguire MG, Ying GS, Ciner EB, et al. Detection of significant hyperopia in preschool children using two automated vision screeners. Optom Vis Sci. 2022;99(2):114–120. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001837
  • Kinori M, Molina I, Hernandez EO, et al. The PlusoptiX photoscreener and the retinomax autorefractor as community-based screening devices for preschool children. Curr Eye Res. 2018;43(5):1–5.
  • Lowry EA, de Alba Campomanes AG. Efficient referral thresholds in autorefraction-based preschool screening. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(6):1180–1187 e3. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2015.02.012