Design and Bioprinting of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for Skin Tissue Engineering

References

• Takeo M, Lee W, Ito M. Wound healing and skin regeneration. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015;5(1):a023267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tottoli EM, Dorati R, Genta I et al. Skin wound healing process and new emerging technologies for skin wound care and regeneration. Pharmaceutics 2020;12(8):735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eming SA, Martin P, Tomic-Canic M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014;6(265):265sr6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezvani Ghomi E, Khalili S, Nouri Khorasani S et al. Wound dressings: current advances and future directions. J. Appl. Poly. Sci. 2019;136(27):47738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearman BL, Boyce ST, Greenwood JE. Advances in skin tissue bioengineering and the challenges of clinical translation [mini review]. Front. Surg. 2021;8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouhan D, Dey N, Bhardwaj N et al. Emerging and innovative approaches for wound healing and skin regeneration: current status and advances. Biomaterials 2019;216:119267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarmin AM, El Moussaid N, Suntornnond R et al. Multi-scale analysis of the composition, structure, and function of decellularized extracellular matrix for human skin and wound healing models. Biomolecules 2022;12(6):837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth AJ, Hadley R, Cornett AM et al. Acellular normal and fibrotic human lung matrices as a culture system for in vitro investigation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2012;186(9):866–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L, Hu Y, Ullah MW et al. Cryogenic free-form extrusion bioprinting of decellularized small intestinal submucosa for potential applications in skin tissue engineering. Biofabrication 2019;11(3):035023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BS, Kwon YW, Kong J-S et al. 3D cell printing of in vitro stabilized skin model and in vivo pre-vascularized skin patch using tissue-specific extracellular matrix bioink: a step towards advanced skin tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2018;168:38–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen AM, Chou Z, Gillispie G et al. Decellularized skin extracellular matrix (dsECM) improves the physical and biological properties of fibrinogen hydrogel for skin bioprinting applications. Nanomaterials 2020;10(8):1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu Z, Fu J, Lin H et al. Development of 3D bioprinting: from printing methods to biomedical applications. Asian J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2020;15(5):529–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Fang H, Su Y et al. A 3D bioprinted decellularized extracellular matrix/gelatin/quaternized chitosan scaffold assembling with poly(ionic liquid)s for skin tissue engineering [Article]. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022;220:1253–1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashiri Z, Rajabi Fomeshi M, Ghasemi Hamidabadi H et al. 3D-printed placental-derived bioinks for skin tissue regeneration with improved angiogenesis and wound healing properties. Mat. Today Bio. 2023;20:100666.
   Google Scholar
• Groll J, Burdick JA, Cho DW et al. A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks. Biofabrication. 2019;11(1):013001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldin LT, Cramer MC, Velankar SS et al. Extracellular matrix hydrogels from decellularized tissues: structure and function. Acta Biomater. 2017;49:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saricilar EC, Huang S. Comparison of porcine and human acellular dermal matrix outcomes in wound healing: a deep dive into the evidence. Arch. Plast. Surg. 2021;48(4):433–439.
   Google Scholar
• Cicuéndez M, Casarrubios L, Feito MJ et al. Effects of human and porcine adipose extracellular matrices decellularized by enzymatic or chemical methods on macrophage polarization and immunocompetence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(8):3847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagher G. Quality matters: international standards for biobanking. Cell Prolif. 2022;55(8):e13282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malek A, Bersinger NA. Human placental stem cells: biomedical potential and clinical relevance. J. Stem Cells 2011;6(2):75–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pogozhykh O, Prokopyuk V, Figueiredo C et al. Placenta and placental derivatives in regenerative therapies: experimental studies, history, and prospects. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018:4837930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez ML, Castells-Sala C, López-Chicón P et al. Fast protocol for the processing of split-thickness skin into decellularized human dermal matrix. Tissue Cell 2021;72:101572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore MA, Samsell B, Wallis G et al. Decellularization of human dermis using non-denaturing anionic detergent and endonuclease: a review. Cell Tissue Bank. 2015;16(2):249–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn HM, Lee DH, Lee IJ. Ready-to-use micronized human acellular dermal matrix to accelerate wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective randomized pilot study. Adv. Skin Wound Care 2021;34(5):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mineta S, Endo S, Ueno T. Optimization of decellularization methods using human small intestinal submucosa for scaffold generation in regenerative medicine. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2023;104(6):313–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirsadraee S, Wilcox HE, Korossis SA et al. Development and characterization of an acellular human pericardial matrix for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(4):763–773.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirsadraee S, Wilcox HE, Watterson KG et al. Biocompatibility of acellular human pericardium. J. Surg. Res. 2007;143(2):407–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BS, Das S, Jang J et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks for engineering tissue- and organ-specific microenvironments. Chem. Rev. 2020;120(19):10608–10661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulan L, Léopold P. What determines organ size during development and regeneration? Development 2021;148(1):dev196063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzi G, Lander AD, Khammash M. Cell lineage branching as a strategy for proliferative control. BMC Biol. 2015;13(1):13.
   Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Shao A, Shan Y et al. A standardized quantitative method for detecting remnant alpha-Gal antigen in animal tissues or animal tissue-derived biomaterials and its application. Scient. Reports 2018;8(1):15424.
   Google Scholar
• Joziasse DH, Oriol R. Xenotransplantation: the importance of the Galα1,3Gal epitope in hyperacute vascular rejection. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) 1999;1455(2):403–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandrin MS, McKenzie IF. Gal alpha (1,3)Gal, the major xenoantigen(s) recognised in pigs by human natural antibodies. Immunol. Rev. 1994;141:169–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boneva RS, Folks TM, Chapman LE. Infectious disease issues in xenotransplantation. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001;14(1):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim M, Ayyoubi HS, Alkhairi LA et al. Fish skin grafts versus alternative wound dressings in wound care: a systematic review of the literature. Cureus 2023;15(3):e36348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson S, Baldursson BT, Kjartansson H et al. Regenerative and antibacterial properties of acellular fish skin grafts and human amnion/chorion membrane: implications for tissue preservation in combat casualty care. Milit. Med. 2017;182(Suppl. 1):383–388.
   Google Scholar
• Coppola D, Lauritano C, Palma Esposito F et al. Fish waste: from problem to valuable resource. Mar. Drugs 2021;19(2):116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng L, Ma J, Sun X et al. Comprehensive proteomic atlas of skin biomatrix scaffolds reveals a supportive microenvironment for epidermal development. J. Tissue Eng. 2020;11:2041731420972310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin RH, Cui YC, Chen HJ et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting of a full-thickness functional skin model using acellular dermal matrix and gelatin methacrylamide bioink. Acta Biomater. 2021;131:248–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawakatsu M, Urata Y, Goto S et al. Placental extract protects bone marrow-derived stem/progenitor cells against radiation injury through anti-inflammatory activity. J. Radiat. Res. 2013;54(2):268–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bak DH, Na J, Im SI et al. Antioxidant effect of human placenta hydrolysate against oxidative stress on muscle atrophy. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019;234(2):1643–1658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong JW, Lee WJ, Hahn SB et al. The effect of human placenta extract in a wound healing model. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2010;65(1):96–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igarashi K, Sugimoto K, Hirano E. Placental extract suppresses the formation of fibrotic deposits by tumor necrosis factor alpha and transforming growth factor beta-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in ARPE-19 cells. BMC Res. Notes. 2021;14(1):407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao Y, Ma DH, Hwang DG et al. Identification of antiangiogenic and antiinflammatory proteins in human amniotic membrane. Cornea 2000;19(3):348–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmi YP, Sigler L, Inge E et al. Antibacterial properties of human amniotic membranes. Placenta 1991;12(3):285–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan Q-W, Tang S-L, Zhang Y et al. Hydrogel from acellular porcine adipose tissue accelerates wound healing by inducing intradermal adipocyte regeneration. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2019;139(2):455–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pati F, Ha DH, Jang J et al. Biomimetic 3D tissue printing for soft tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 2015;62:164–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao G, Huang Y, Li K et al. Small intestinal submucosa: superiority, limitations and solutions, and its potential to address bottlenecks in tissue repair. J. Mat. Chem. B. 2019;7(33):5038–5055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDevitt CA, Wildey GM, Cutrone RM. Transforming growth factor-beta1 in a sterilized tissue derived from the pig small intestine submucosa. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2003;67(2):637–640.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magden GK, Vural C, Bayrak BY et al. Composite sponges from sheep decellularized small intestinal submucosa for treatment of diabetic wounds. J. Biomater. Appl. 2021;36(1):113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L, Ramsay S, Ermis R et al. In vitro and in vivo studies on matrix metalloproteinases interacting with small intestine submucosa wound matrix. Int. Wound J. 2012;9(1):44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capella-Monsonís H, Tilbury MA, Wall JG et al. Porcine mesothelium matrix as a biomaterial for wound healing applications. Mater. Today Bio. 2020;7:100057.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Witz CA, Montoya-Rodriguez IA, Cho S et al. Composition of the extracellular matrix of the peritoneum. J. Soc. Gynecol. Investig. 2001;8(5):299–304.
   Google Scholar
• Hoganson DM, Owens GE, O’Doherty EM et al. Preserved extracellular matrix components and retained biological activity in decellularized porcine mesothelium. Biomaterials 2010;31(27):6934–6940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crapo PM, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials 2011;32(12):3233–3243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF. Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials 2006;27(19):3675–3683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasertsung I, Kanokpanont S, Bunaprasert T et al. Development of acellular dermis from porcine skin using periodic pressurized technique. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2008;85(1):210–219.
   Google Scholar
• Reing JE, Brown BN, Daly KA et al. The effects of processing methods upon mechanical and biologic properties of porcine dermal extracellular matrix scaffolds. Biomaterials 2010;31(33):8626–8633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen RN, Ho HO, Tsai YT et al. Process development of an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 2004;25(13):2679–2686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funamoto S, Nam K, Kimura T et al. The use of high-hydrostatic pressure treatment to decellularize blood vessels. Biomaterials 2010;31(13):3590–3595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown BN, Valentin JE, Stewart-Akers AM et al. Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component. Biomaterials 2009;30(8):1482–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pati F, Jang J, Ha D-H et al. Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Nat. Commun. 2014;5(1):3935.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong W, Kim MK, Kang HW. Effect of detergent type on the performance of liver decellularized extracellular matrix-based bio-inks. J Tissue Eng. 2021;12:2041731421997091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtman DW, Pereira CA, Kashef V et al. Development of a pericardial acellular matrix biomaterial: biochemical and mechanical effects of cell extraction. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1994;28(6):655–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodnar E, Olsen EG, Florio R et al. Damage of porcine aortic valve tissue caused by the surfactant sodiumdodecylsulphate. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1986;34(2):82–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Ding Q, Dutta A et al. An injectable extracellular matrix derived hydrogel for meniscus repair and regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2015;16:49–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieder E, Kasimir MT, Silberhumer G et al. Decellularization protocols of porcine heart valves differ importantly in efficiency of cell removal and susceptibility of the matrix to recellularization with human vascular cells. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2004;127(2):399–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudorache I, Cebotari S, Sturz G et al. Tissue engineering of heart valves: biomechanical and morphological properties of decellularized heart valves. J. Heart Valve Dis. 2007;16(5):567–573; discussion 574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Fritze O, Schleicher M et al. Impact of heart valve decellularization on 3-D ultrastructure, immunogenicity and thrombogenicity. Biomaterials 2010;31(9):2549–2554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozeki M, Narita Y, Kagami H et al. Evaluation of decellularized esophagus as a scaffold for cultured esophageal epithelial cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2006;79(4):771–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MK, Jeong W, Lee SM et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix-based bio-ink with enhanced 3D printability and mechanical properties. Biofabrication 2020;12(2):025003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grauss RW, Hazekamp MG, van Vliet S et al. Decellularization of rat aortic valve allografts reduces leaflet destruction and extracellular matrix remodeling. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2003;126(6):2003–2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartmell JS, Dunn MG. Effect of chemical treatments on tendon cellularity and mechanical properties. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000;49(1):134–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roosens A, Somers P, De Somer F et al. Impact of detergent-based decellularization methods on porcine tissues for heart valve engineering. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2016;44(9):2827–2839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SJ, Lee JH, Park J et al. Fabrication of 3D printing scaffold with porcine skin decellularized bio-ink for soft tissue engineering. Materials 2020;13(16):9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han W, Singh NK, Kim JJ et al. Directed differential behaviors of multipotent adult stem cells from decellularized tissue/organ extracellular matrix bioinks. Biomaterials 2019;224:119496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Li Q, Yang Q et al. Three-dimensional cell printing of gingival fibroblast/acellular dermal matrix/gelatin–sodium alginate scaffolds and their biocompatibility evaluation in vitro [10.1039/D0RA02082F]. RSC Adv. 2020;10(27):15926–15935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang KS, Park SJ, Choi JJ et al. Therapeutic efficacy of artificial skin produced by 3D bioprinting. Materials (Basel) 2021;14(18):5177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Fu Q, Fu H et al. 3D-bioprinted human lipoaspirate-derived cell-laden skin constructs for healing of full-thickness skin defects. Int. J. Bioprint. 2023;9(4):718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu HW, Kim BS, Lee JY et al. Tissue printing for engineering transplantable human parathyroid patch to improve parathyroid engraftment, integration, and hormone secretionin vivo. Biofabrication 2021;13(3):035033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam H, Jeong H-J, Jo Y et al. Multi-layered free-form 3D cell-printed tubular construct with decellularized inner and outer esophageal tissue-derived bioinks. Scient. Rep. 2020;10(1):7255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim W, Kim GH. An intestinal model with a finger-like villus structure fabricated using a bioprinting process and collagen/SIS-based cell-laden bioink. Theranostics 2020;10(6):2495–2508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickman CTD, Russo V, Thain K et al. Functional characterization of 3D contractile smooth muscle tissues generated using a unique microfluidic 3D bioprinting technology. FASEB J. 2020;34(1):1652–1664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Chae S, Kim JY et al. Cell-printed 3D liver-on-a-chip possessing a liver microenvironment and biliary system. Biofabrication 2019;11(2):025001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan Y, Huang W, Zhan B et al. Bioink derived from human placenta supporting angiogenesis. Biomed. Mater. 2022;17(5):055009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badileanu A, Mora-Navarro C, Gracioso Martins AM et al. Fast automated approach for the derivation of acellular extracellular matrix scaffolds from porcine soft tissues. ACS Biomat. Sci. Engin. 2020;6(7):4200–4213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Lüchow M, Badria A et al. Placenta powder-infused thiol-ene PEG hydrogels as potential tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 2023;24(4):1617–1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi H, Ye K, Jin S. Proteomic analysis of decellularized pancreatic matrix identifies collagen V as a critical regulator for islet organogenesis from human pluripotent stem cells. Biomaterials 2020;233:119673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbell J. Matrix-bound growth factors in tissue repair. Swiss Med. Weekly 2006;136(25–26):387–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtovenko AA, Anwar J. Modulating the structure and properties of cell membranes: the molecular mechanism of action of dimethyl sulfoxide. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007;111(35):10453–10460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani F, Ekhtiari M, Moeini Chaghervand B et al. Detection of the residual concentration of sodium dodecyl sulfate in the decellularized whole rabbit kidney extracellular matrix. Cell Tissue Bank. 2022;23(1):119–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White LJ, Taylor AJ, Faulk DM et al. The impact of detergents on the tissue decellularization process: a ToF-SIMS study. Acta Biomater. 2017;50:207–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich EE, Lanier ST, Niknam-Bienia S et al. Residual sodium dodecyl sulfate in decellularized muscle matrices leads to fibroblast activation in vitro and foreign body response in vivo. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2018;12(3):e1704–e1715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guler S, Aydin HM, Lü LX et al. Improvement of decellularization efficiency of porcine aorta using dimethyl sulfoxide as a penetration enhancer. Artif. Organs 2018;42(2):219–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawazoye S, Tian SF, Toda S et al. The mechanism of interaction of sodium dodecyl sulfate with elastic fibers. J. Biochem. 1995;117(6):1254–1260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leive L. Release of lipopolysaccharide by EDTA treatment of E. coli. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1965;21(4):290–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girardeau-Hubert S, Lynch B, Zuttion F et al. Impact of microstructure on cell behavior and tissue mechanics in collagen and dermal decellularized extra-cellular matrices. Acta Biomat. 2022;143:100–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada S, Dubois V, Koenig A et al. Allograft recognition by recipient’s natural killer cells: molecular mechanisms and role in transplant rejection. Hla 2021;98(3):191–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu T, Yang B, Wang R et al. Xenotransplantation: current status in preclinical research. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:3060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Mutukuri TT, Wilson NE et al. Pharmaceutical protein solids: drying technology, solid-state characterization and stability. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021;172:211–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan WS, Duffy GP, Murphy BP. Optimum parameters for freeze-drying decellularized arterial scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2013;19(12):981–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zambon A, Vetralla M, Urbani L et al. Dry acellular oesophageal matrix prepared by supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2016;115:33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giobbe GG, Zambon A, Vetralla M et al. Preservation over time of dried acellular esophageal matrix. Biomed. Phys. Engin. Express 2018;4(6):065021.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin JJ, Walsh G. Medical Product Regulatory Affairs: Pharmaceuticals, Diagnostics, Medical Devices. Germany: Wiley; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Mohapatra S. Sterilization and disinfection. Essent. Neuroanesth. 2017;929–944.
   Google Scholar
• Heseltine P. Book Review: Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation, 5th ed. SS Block, ed.; Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001; 1504 pages. Infect. Contr. Hospital Epidemiol. 2002;23(2):109.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson AJ, Nayak S. Disinfection, sterilization and disposables. Anaesth. Inten. Care Med. 2013;14(10):423–427.
   Google Scholar
• Soares GC, Learmonth DA, Vallejo MC et al. Supercritical CO2 technology: the next standard sterilization technique? Mat. Sci. Engin. 2019;99:520–540.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell CR, Djonov V, Fellabaum C et al. Risks of using sterilization by gamma radiation: the other side of the coin. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2018;15(3):274–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrázová H, Koller J, Kubišová K et al. Comparison of structural changes in skin and amnion tissue grafts for transplantation induced by gamma and electron beam irradiation for sterilization. Cell Tissue Bank. 2016;17(2):255–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Versen-Hoeynck F, Steinfeld AP, Becker J et al. Sterilization and preservation influence the biophysical properties of human amnion grafts. Biologicals 2008;36(4):248–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosario DJ, Reilly GC, Ali Salah E et al. Decellularization and sterilization of porcine urinary bladder matrix for tissue engineering in the lower urinary tract. Regen. Med. 2008;3(2):145–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen T, Hietala O, Lindholm TS et al. Influence of ethylene oxide sterilization on the activity of native reindeer bone morphogenetic protein. Int. Orthop. 2004;28(2):97–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloff M, Janke HP, de Jonge PKJD et al. The impact of γ-irradiation and EtO degassing on tissue remodeling of collagen-based hybrid tubular templates. ACS Biomat. Sci. Engin. 2018;4(9):3282–3290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai Z, Ronholm J, Tian Y et al. Sterilization techniques for biodegradable scaffolds in tissue engineering applications. J. Tissue Eng. 2016;7:2041731416648810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boiano JM, Steege AL. Ethylene oxide and hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilization: precautionary practices in U.S. hospitals. Zentralsterilisation (Wiesb) 2015;23(4):262–268.
   Google Scholar
• Gosztyla C, Ladd MR, Werts A et al. A comparison of sterilization techniques for production of decellularized intestine in mice. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2020;26(2):67–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell N, Oliver RA, Walsh WR. The effect of sterilization methods on the osteoconductivity of allograft bone in a critical-sized bilateral tibial defect model in rabbits. Biomaterials 2013;34(33):8185–8194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols A, Burns D, Christopher R. Studies on the sterilization of human bone and tendon musculoskeletal allograft tissue using supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Orthopaed. 2009;6(2):e9.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu QQ, Leamy P, Brittingham J et al. Inactivation of bacterial spores and viruses in biological material using supercritical carbon dioxide with sterilant. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2009;91(2):572–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw J, Au L, Hull B et al. eds. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Sterilization Minimally Affects Human Allograft Skin Morphology and Biomechanics. ASME 2010 Summer Bioengineering Conference; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Balestrini JL, Liu A, Gard AL et al. Sterilization of lung matrices by supercritical carbon dioxide. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2016;22(3):260–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy RS, Jana S, Tefft BJ et al. Supercritical carbon dioxide-based sterilization of decellularized heart valves. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2017;2(1):71–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wehmeyer JL, Natesan S, Christy RJ. Development of a sterile amniotic membrane tissue graft using supercritical carbon dioxide. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2015;21(7):649–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won J-Y, Lee M-H, Kim M-J et al. A potential dermal substitute using decellularized dermis extracellular matrix derived bio-ink. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2019;47(1):644–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Li Z, Zheng Y et al. 3D-printed dermis-specific extracellular matrix mitigates scar contraction via inducing early angiogenesis and macrophage M2 polarization. Bioact. Mat. 2022;10:236–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou F, Hong Y, Liang R et al. Rapid printing of bio-inspired 3D tissue constructs for skin regeneration. Biomaterials 2020;258:120287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal PN, Delrot P, Loterie D et al. Volumetric bioprinting of complex living-tissue constructs within s. Advan. Mat. 2019;31(42):1904209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal PN, Bouwmeester M, Madrid-Wolff J et al. Volumetric bioprinting of organoids and optically tuned hydrogels to build liver-like metabolic biofactories. Advan. Mat. 2022;34(15):2110054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Wang M, Ma H et al. Stereolithography apparatus and digital light processing-based 3D bioprinting for tissue fabrication. iScience 2023;26(2):106039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Chen M, Fan X et al. Recent advances in bioprinting techniques: approaches, applications and future prospects. J. Translat. Med. 2016;14(1):271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li X, Liu B, Pei B et al. Inkjet bioprinting of biomaterials. Chem. Rev. 2020;120(19):10793–10833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boularaoui S, Al Hussein G, Khan KA et al. An overview of extrusion-based bioprinting with a focus on induced shear stress and its effect on cell viability. Bioprinting 2020;20:e00093.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao F, Cheng J, Sun M et al. Digestion degree is a key factor to regulate the printability of pure tendon decellularized extracellular matrix bio-ink in extrusion-based 3D cell printing. Biofabrication 2020;12(4):045011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton TJ, Jallerat Q, Palchesko RN et al. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci. Advan. 2015;1(9):e1500758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang L, Highley CB, Sun W et al. A generalizable strategy for the 3D bioprinting of hydrogels from nonviscous photo-crosslinkable Inks. Advan. Mater. 2017;29(8):1604983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira RF, Lourenco BN, Bartolo PJ et al. Bioprinting a multifunctional bioink to engineer clickable 3D cellular niches with tunable matrix microenvironmental cues. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021;10(2):e2001176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu H, Zhang D, Zeng J et al. Application of 3D-printed tissue-engineered skin substitute using innovative biomaterial loaded with human adipose-derived stem cells in wound healing. Int. J. Bioprint. 2023;9(2):674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir VG, Qazi TH, Weintraub S et al. Sticking together: injectable granular hydrogels with increased functionality via dynamic covalent inter-particle crosslinking. Small 2022;18(36):2201115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorj B, Won JE, Kim JH et al. Robocasting nanocomposite scaffolds of poly(caprolactone)/hydroxyapatite incorporating modified carbon nanotubes for hard tissue reconstruction. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2013;101(6):1670–1681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moura D, Pereira RF, Gonçalves IC. Recent advances on bioprinting of hydrogels containing carbon materials. Mater. Today Chem. 2022;23:100617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Chen X, Hong H et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: recent trends and emerging strategies in tissue engineering. Bioact. Mater. 2022;10:15–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solarte David VA, Güiza-Argüello VR, Arango-Rodríguez ML et al. Decellularized tissues for wound healing: towards closing the gap between scaffold design and effective extracellular matrix remodeling [review]. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022;10:821852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Gong Y, Zhang K et al. Recent advances in decellularized matrix-derived materials for bioink and 3D bioprinting. Gels. 2023;9(3):195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BS, Ahn M, Cho W-W et al. Engineering of diseased human skin equivalent using 3D cell printing for representing pathophysiological hallmarks of type 2 diabetes in vitro. Biomaterials 2021;272:120776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BS, Gao G, Kim JY et al. 3D cell printing of perfusable vascularized human skin equivalent composed of epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis for better structural recapitulation of native skin. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019;8(7):1801019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Han Y, Wang S et al. Three-dimensional printing bilayer membranous nanofiber scaffold for inhibiting scar hyperplasia of skin. Biomater. Adv. 2022;138:212951.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Wu B, Xiong Y et al. Cryogenic 3D printed hydrogel scaffolds loading exosomes accelerate diabetic wound healing. Chem. Engin. J. 2021;426:130634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaci A, Guvendiren M. Designing decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Advan. Healthc. Mat. 2020;9(24):2000734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Hsu S-h. Synthesis and biomedical applications of self-healing hydrogels [mini review]. Front. Chem. 2018;6:449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi YJ, Park H, Ha DH et al. 3D bioprinting of in vitro models using hydrogel-based bioinks. Polymers (Basel) 2021;13(3):366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri O, Gu L, Klumpers D et al. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat. Mat. 2016;15(3):326–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Heilshorn SC. Adaptable hydrogel networks with reversible linkages for tissue engineering. Advan. Mat. 2015;27(25):3717–3736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazur J, Detsch R, Karakaya E et al. Improving alginate printability for biofabrication: establishment of a universal and homogeneous pre-crosslinking technique. Biofabrication 2020;12(4):045004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khetan S, Guvendiren M, Legant WR et al. Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat. Mat. 2013;12(5):458–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira RF, Barrias CC, Bártolo PJ et al. Cell-instructive pectin hydrogels crosslinked via thiol-norbornene photo-click chemistry for skin tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia 2018;66:282–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan FLC, Moroni L, Baker MB. Dynamic bioinks to advance bioprinting. Advan. Healthc. Mater. 2020;9(15):1901798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin M, Galarraga JH, Kwon MY et al. Gallol-derived ECM-mimetic adhesive bioinks exhibiting temporal shear-thinning and stabilization behavior. Acta Biomat. 2019;95:165–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan FLC, Fernández-Pérez J, Moroni L et al. Tuning hydrogels by mixing dynamic cross-linkers: enabling cell-instructive hydrogels and advanced bioinks. Advan. Healthc. Mater. 2022;11(1):2101576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parenteau-Bareil R, Gauvin R, Berthod F. Collagen-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Materials 2010;3(3):1863–1887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behre A, Tashman JW, Dikyol C et al. 3D bioprinted patient-specific extracellular matrix scaffolds for soft tissue defects. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2022;11(24):e2200866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bin Y, Dongzhen Z, Xiaoli C et al. Modeling human hypertrophic scars with 3D preformed cellular aggregates bioprinting. Bioact. Mater. 2022;10:247–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Melo BAG, Jodat YA, Cruz EM et al. Strategies to use fibrinogen as bioink for 3D bioprinting fibrin-based soft and hard tissues. Acta Biomater. 2020;117:60–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen AM, Varkey M, Gorkun A et al. Bioprinted skin recapitulates normal collagen remodeling in full-thickness wounds. Tissue Eng. Part A 2020;26(9–10):512–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang MS, Kwon M, Lee SH et al. 3D printing of skin equivalents with hair follicle structures and epidermal-papillary-dermal layers using gelatin/hyaluronic acid Hydrogels. Chem. Asian J. 2022;17(18):e202200620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stichler S, Böck T, Paxton N et al. Double printing of hyaluronic acid/poly(glycidol) hybrid hydrogels with poly(ε-caprolactone) for MSC chondrogenesis. Biofabrication 2017;9(4):044108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong Y, Ma H, Lu Y et al. Investigation on repairing diabetic foot ulcer based on 3D bio-printing Gel/dECM/Qcs composite scaffolds. Tissue Cell 2023;85:102213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang B, Park Y, Hwang DG et al. Facile bioprinting process for fabricating size-controllable functional microtissues using light-activated decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks. Advan. Mater. Technolog. 2022;7(1):2100947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar