86
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Notes

Nutritional properties and in vitro gas production in cactus pear (Opuntia stricta) and cassava (Manihot esculenta) shoot silages

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 392-400 | Received 07 Oct 2022, Accepted 27 Jan 2023, Published online: 09 Mar 2023

References

  • Abdelnour SA, El-hack MEA, Swelum AA, Perillo A, Losacco C. 2018. The vital roles of boron in animal health and production: a comprehensive review. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 50: 296–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2018.07.018
  • Alves HKMN, Jardim AMRF, Souza LSB, Araújo Júnior GN, Alves CP, Araújo GGL et al. 2022.Integrated management of agronomic practices in the forage cactus: maximizing productivity, biological efficiency and economic profitability. Journal of the Professional Association for Cactus Development 24: 307–329. https://doi.org/10.56890/jpacd.v24i.514
  • AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 2016. Official methods of analysis (20th edn). Washington, DC: AOAC International.
  • Araújo JAS, Almeida JCC, Reis RA, Carvalho CAB, Barbero RP. 2020. Harvest period and baking industry residue inclusion on production efficiency and chemical composition of tropical grass silage. Journal of Cleaner Production 266: e121953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121953
  • Assis JR, Assis ACM, Fernandes GA. 2021. Mathematical modeling applied to ruminal digestion and gas production in vitro. Scientific Electronic Archives 13: 6–15. http://doi.org/10.36560/14420211317
  • Azevedo Júnior MS, Ferreira Neto M, Medeiros JF, Sá FVS, Lima YB, Lemos M. 2019. Produtividade e teor de nutrientes em palma forrageira irrigada com efluente de esgoto doméstico. Irriga 24: 830–842. http://doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2019v24n4p830-842
  • Azmat R, Masood S, Ahmed T, Ahmed W. 2021. Application of Mohr’s method for the determination of chloride in plant tissue extracts using the conductometric titration. Pakistan Journal of Chemistry 11: 28–32. https://doi.org/10.15228/2020.v11.i01-4.p05
  • Bilong EG, Abossolo-Angue M, Nanganoa LT, Anaba BD, Ajebesone FN, Madong BA, Bilong P. 2022. Organic manures and inorganic fertilizers effects on soil properties and economic analysis under cassava cultivation in the southern Cameroon. Scientific Reports 12: e20598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17991-6
  • Bueno ESB, Souza AM, Deak FLGB, Fagiani MAB, Oba E, Chiacchio SB, Reis LSLS. 2019. O manganês e suas interações antagônicas e sinérgicas entre os elementos minerais sobre a reprodução e o metabolismo de touros. Veterinária e Zootecnia 26: 90–101.
  • Campos FS, Araújo GGL, Simões WL, Gois GC, Machado Guimarães MJ, da Silva TGF et al. 2021. Mineral and fermentative profile of forage sorghum irrigated with brackish water. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 52: 1353–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2021.1885682
  • Carvalho CBM, Edvan RL, Nascimento KS, Nascimento RR, Bezerra LR, Jácome DLS et al. 2020. Methods of storing cactus pear genotypes for animal feeding. African Journal of Range & Forage Science 37: 173–179. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2020.1734084
  • de Souza Cunha D, da Conceição Rodrigues JM, de Jesus Pinheiro Costa C, da Silva Lima R, de Almeida Araújo C, de Oliveira GF, et al. 2022. Mineral profile, carbohydrates fractionation, nitrogen compounds and in vitro gas production of elephant grass silages associated with cactus pear. Bulletin of the National Research Centre 46: e257. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-022-00948-0
  • du Toit A, de Wit M, Osthoff G, Hugo A. 2018. Antioxidant properties of fresh and processed cactus pear cladodes from selected Opuntia ficus-indica and O. robusta cultivars. South African Journal of Botany 118: 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2018.06.014
  • Epifanio PS, Costa KAP, Severiano EC, Cruvinel WS, Bento JC, Perim RC. 2014. Fermentative and bromatological characteristics of Piata palisadegrass ensiled with levels of meals from biodiesel industry. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 35: 491–504. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n1p491
  • Gomes MLR, Alves FC, Silva Filho JRV, Souza CM, Silva MNP, Santana Jr RA et al. 2022. Maniçoba for sheep and goats – forage yield, conservation strategies, animal performance and quality of products. Ciência Rural 52: e20201096. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20201096
  • He L, Wang C, Xing Y, Zhou W, Pian R, Chen X, Zhang Q. 2020. Ensiling characteristics, proteolysis and bacterial community of high-moisture corn stalk and stylo silage prepared with Bauhinia variegate flower. Bioresource Technology 296: article 122336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122336
  • Henry PR, Miles RD. 2000. Interactions among the trace minerals. Ciência Animal Brasileira 1: 95–106.
  • Kumar S, Louhaichi M, Ram PD, Tirumala KK, Ahmad S, Rai AK et al. 2021. Cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) productivity, proximal composition and soil parameters as affected by planting time and agronomic management in a semi-arid region of India. Agronomy (Basel) 11: e1647. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081647
  • Kupczyński R, Bednarski M, Śpitalniak K, Pogoda-Sewerniak K. 2017. Effects of protein–iron complex concentrate supplementation on iron metabolism, oxidative and immune status in preweaning calves. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18: e1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071501
  • Licitra G, Hernandez TM, Van Soest PJ. 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminants feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57: 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00837-3
  • Liguori G, Gaglio R, Greco G, Gentile C, Settanni L, Inglese P. 2021. Effect of Opuntia ficus-indica mucilage edible coating on quality, nutraceutical, and sensorial parameters of minimally processed cactus pear fruits. Agronomy (Basel) 11: e1963. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11101963
  • Lima AES, Mota MO, Gois GC, Amorim JS, Menezes DR, Antonio RP, Voltolini TV. 2022. Chemical composition and morphophysiological responses of Manihot plants. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 43: 2237–2252. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.22v43n5p2237
  • Mabotja MB, Gerrano AS, Venter SL, du Plooy CP, Kudanga T, Amoo SO. 2021. Nutritional variability in 42 cultivars of spineless cactus pear cladodes for crop improvement. South African Journal of Botany 142: 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.06.022.
  • Magalhães ALR, Teodoro AL, Gois GC, Campos FS, Souza JSR, de Andrade AP, et al. 2019. Chemical and mineral composition, kinetics of degradation and in vitro gas production of native cactus. Journal of Agricultural Studies 7: 119–137. https://doi.org/10.5296/jas.v7i4
  • Magalhães ALR, Teodoro AL, Oliveira LP, Gois GC, Campos FS, de Andrade AP, et al. 2021. Chemical composition, fractionation of carbohydrates and nitrogen compounds, ruminal degradation kinetics, and in vitro gas production of cactus pear genotypes. Ciência Animal Brasileira 22: e69338. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v22e-69338
  • Malavolta E, Vitti GC, Oliveira SA. 1997. Avaliação do estado nutricional das plantas: princípios e aplicações (2nd edn). Piracicaba: POTAFOS.
  • Menezes DR, Santos JM, Oliveira CRN, Marcelino PDR, Pinheiro APMA, Carvalho DTQ et al. 2022. Rainfall variability affects the chemical composition, gas production and degradability of cacti. Revista Colombiana de Ciência Animal 14: e895. https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v14.n1.2022.895
  • Mertens DR. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 85: 1217–1240. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12477183
  • Mordenti AL, Giaretta E, Campidonico L, Parazza P, Formigoni A. 2021. A review regarding the use of molasses in animal nutrition. Animals 11: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010115
  • Navarro DMDL, Abelilla JJ, Stein HH. 2019. Structures and characteristics of carbohydrates in diets fed to pigs: a review. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 10: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0345-6
  • Novoa A, Flepu V, Boatwright JS. 2019. Is spinelessness a stable character in cactus pear cultivars? Implications for invasiveness. Journal of Arid Environments 160: 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2018.09.013
  • NRC (National Research Council). 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids and New World camelids. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
  • NRC (National Research Council). 2016. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle (8th edn). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Oberson JL, Probst S, Schlegel P. 2019. Magnesium absorption as influenced by the rumen passage kinetics in lactating dairy cows fed modified levels of fibre and protein. Animal 13: 1412–1420. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002963
  • Pessoa DV, de Andrade AP, Magalhães ALR, Teodoro AL, dos Santos DC, de Araújo GGL, et al. 2020. Forage nutritional differences within the genus Opuntia. Journal of Arid Environments 181: e104246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104243
  • Santos CB, de Pinho Costa KA, de Souza WF, e Silva VC, Soares Epifanio P, Sousa Santos H. 2019. Protein and carbohydrates fractionation in Paiaguas palisadegrass intercropped with grain sorghum in pasture recovery. Acta Scientiarum/Animal Sciences 41: e42693. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.42693
  • Schofield P, Pitt RE, Pell AN. 1994. Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. Journal of Animal Science 72: 2980–2991. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.72112980x
  • Sharma A, Mani V, Pal RP, Sarkar S, Datt C. 2020. Boron supplementation in peripartum Murrah buffaloes: the effect on calcium homeostasis, bone metabolism, endocrine and antioxidant status. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 62: e126623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2020.126623
  • Si M, Zhao C, Burkinshaw B, Zhang B, Wei D, Wang Y et al. 2017. Manganese scavenging and oxidative stress response mediated by type VI secretion system in Burkholderia thailandensis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114: 2233–2242. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614902114
  • Silva de Oliveira T, Magno Fernandes A, Fonsêca Processi E, Ferreira Baffa D, Camilo MG. 2022. Stoichiometric models for prediction of enteric methane production. Bioscience Journal 38: e38038. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-53647
  • Sniffen CJ, O’Connor JD, Van Soest PJ, Fox DG, Russell JB. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II – Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science 70: 3562–3577. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113562x
  • Thanni B, Merckx R, Bauw P, Boeraeve M, Peeters G, Hauser S, Honnay O. 2022. Spatial variability and environmental drivers of cassava–arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF) associations across southern Nigeria. Mycorrhiza 32: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-021-01058-x
  • Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, Mcallan AB, France J. 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology 48: 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6
  • Valente TNP, Detmann E, Queiroz AC, Valadares Filho SC, Gomes DI, Figueiras JF. 2011. Evaluation of ruminal degradation profiles of forages using bags made from different textiles. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40: 2565–2573. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011001100039
  • Van Soest PJ. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant (2nd edn). Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Villalba JJ, Ates S, MacAdam JW. 2021. Non-fiber carbohydrates in forages and their influence on beef production systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5: e566338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.566338
  • Wysocka D, Snarska A, Sobiech P. 2020. Iron in cattle health. Journal of Elementology 25: 1175–1185. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2020.25.2.1960
  • Ye Q, Park JE, Gugnani K, Betharia S, Pino-Figueroa A, Kim J. 2017. Influence of iron metabolism on manganese transport and toxicity. Metallomics 9: 1028–1046. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7mt00079k

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.