Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions and Sensorineural Hearing Loss

References

• Kemp D T. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386–1391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenner H P, Reuter G, Plinkert P K, Zimmermann V, Gitter A H. Outer hair cells possess acetylcholine receptors and produce motile responses in the organ of Corti;. Cochlear Mechanisms., J P Wilson, DT Kemp. Plenum Publishing, New York 1989; 93–98
   Google Scholar
• Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2027–2066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiedt R A, Adams J C. Stimulated acoustic emissions in the ear canal of the gerbil. Hear Res 1981; 5: 195–305
   Google Scholar
• Brown A M, Gaskill S A. Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 840–849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurek P M, Clark W W, Kim D O. The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal and damaged ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 72: 774–780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K, Probst R, Coats A C. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability. Hear Res 1987; 28: 173–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Harris F P, Stagner B, Hawkins M D, Martin G K. Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 3–14, 99/5(suppl 147)
   Google Scholar
• Moulin A, Collet L, Veuillet E, Morgon A. Interrelations between acoustic distortion products transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1993; 65: 216–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wier C C, Pasanen E G, Mc Fadden D. Partial dissociation of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and distortion product during aspirin use in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 230–237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R, Coats A C, Martin G K, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Spontaneous, click-, and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears. Hear Res 1986; 21: 261–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonfils P, Uziel A. Clinical applications of evoked acoustic emissions: Results in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98: 326–331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet L, Gartner M, Moulin A, Kauffman I, Disant F, Morgon A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions and sensorineural hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 115: 1060–1062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet L, Moulin A, Gartner M, Morgon A. Age-related changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 993–997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet L, Veuillet E, Berger-Vachon C, Morgon A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: Relative importance of age sex and sensorineural hearing loss using a mathematical model of the audiogram. Int J Neurosci 1992; 62: 113–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet L, Veuillet E, Chanal J M, Morgon A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: Correlates between spectrum analysis and audiogram. Audiology 1991; 30: 164–172
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strickland A E, Burns E M, Tubis A. Incidence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in children and infants. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 931–935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonfils P. Spontaneous acoustic emissions: Clinical interest. Laryngoscope 1989; 99/7: 752–756.
   Google Scholar
• Moulin A, Collet L, Delli D, Morgon A. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and sensorineural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991; 111: 835–841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B B, Harris F P, Stagner B, Hawkins M D, Martin G K. Distortion product emission in humans. II. Relations to acoustic immitance and stimulus frequency emissions in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99/5: 15–29, (suppl 147)
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk P, Wit H. Synchronization of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to a 2fl-f2 distortion product. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 88: 850–856
   Google Scholar
• Harris F P, Probst R. Growth functions of tone burst evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans;. Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing, P Dallos, C D Geisler, J W Matthews, M A Ruggero, CR Steele. Springer, New York 1990; 178–185
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E, Schloth E. Interrelation of different otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 75/4: 1148–1154.
   Google Scholar
• Furst M, Rabinowits W M, Zurek P M. Ear canal acoustic distortion at 2F1-F2 from human ears: Relation to other emissions and perceived combination tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 215–221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E, Harris F P. Psychoacoustical and ear canal cancellation of 2f 1 -f2 distortion products. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 87: 2583–2591
   Google Scholar
• Martin G K, Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Otoacoustic emissions in human ears: Normative findings. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 106–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris F P, Lonsbury-Martin B B, Stagner B, Coats A C, Martin G K. Acoustic distortion products in humans: Systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/fl ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 1
   Google Scholar
• Gaskill SAA, Brown A M. The behaviour of the acoustic distortion product, 2F1-F2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 821–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin G K, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Probst R, Sceinin S A, Coats A C. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure tone exposures. Hear Res 1987; 29: 191–208
   Google Scholar
• Brown A M, Kemp D T. Suppressibility of the 2fl-f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984; 13: 29–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Brown A M. An integrated view of cochlear mechanical nonlinearities observable from the ear canal;. Cochlear Mechanics., E De Boer, MA Viergever. Delft University Press, Delft 1983
   Google Scholar
• Martin G K, Ohlms L A, Harris F P, Franklin D J, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Distortion product emissions in humans. III. Influence of sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99/5(suppl 147): 30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 93–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R, Antonelli C, Pieren C. Method and preliminary results of measurements of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and pathological ears. Adv Audiol 1991; 7: 12
   Google Scholar
• Franklin D J, McCoy M J, Martin G K, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Test/retest reliability of distortion-product and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1992; 13: 417–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson D A, Kimberley B P. Distortion-product emissions an auditory sensitivity in human ears with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 1142–1159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Cutler W M, Martin G K. Evidence for the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 1749–1759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smurzynski J, Leonard G, Kim D O, Lafreniere D C, Jung M D. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired adult ears. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 116: 1309–1316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smurzynski J, Kim D O. Distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions of normally-hearing adults. Hear Res 1992; 58: 227–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonfils P, Avan P. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Values for clinical use. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118: 1069–1076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorka M P, Neely S T, Bergman B, Beauchaine K L, Kaminski J R, Peters J, Jesteadt W. Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing impaired subjects: Distortion product responses. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 2050–2060
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zwicker E, Schorn K. Delayed evoked otoacoustic emissions: an ideal screening test for excluding hearing impairment in infants. Au-diology 1990; 29: 241–251
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moulin A. Caractérisation des oto-émissions acoustiques et du système efférent cochléaire médian chez ľhumain; thèse Lyon 1993
   Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 144–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wit H P, Ritsma R J. Two aspects of cochlear acoustic emissions: Response latency and minimum stimulus energy;. Mechanics of Hearing., E De Boer, MA Viergever. Delft University Press, Delft 1983; 101–107
   Google Scholar
• Rutten W LC. Latency of stimulated acoustic emissions in normal human ears;. Psychophysical, Physiological and Behavioural Studies in Hearing., G Van der Brink, FA Bilsen. Delft University Press, Delft 1980; 68–71
   Google Scholar
• Probst R, Hauser R. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and hearing impaired ears. Am J Otolaryngol 1990; 11: 236–243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown A M, McDowell B, Forge A. Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear Res 1989; 42: 143–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K, Coats A C. Otoacoustic emissions in ears with hearing-loss. Am J Otolaryngol 1987; 8: 73–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet L, Levy V, Veuillet E, Truy E, Morgon A. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold in sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 2
   Google Scholar
• Horner K C, Lenoir M, Bock G R. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in hearing-impaired mutant mice. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 1603–1611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrott A, Puel J L, Rebillard G. Cochlear origin of 2fl-f2 distortion products assessed by using two types of mutant mice. Hear Res 1991; 52: 245–254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M L, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2fl-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbit. I. Differential physiological vulnerability. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 2662–2682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avan P, Bonfils P, Loth D, Ph Narcy, Trotoux J. Quantitative assessment of human cochlear function by evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1991; 52: 99–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton S J. Application of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions to pediatric populations. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 64–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulin A, Collet L, Duclaux R. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans. Hear Res 1993; 65: 193–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris F P, Probst R. Suppression of the 2fl-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans. Hear Res 1992; 64: 133–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avan P, Bonfils P. Frequency specificity of human distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Audiology 1993; 32: 12–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar