The Value of History-Taking, Physical Examination, and Computer Assistance in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Patients More Than 50 Years Old

References

• de Dombal F T. Ethics in gastroenterology. Leeds: University Press 1986; 11
   Google Scholar
• Telfer S, Fenyö G, Holt P R, de Dombal F T. Acute abdominal pain in patients over 50 years of age. Scand J Gastroenterol 1988; 23(Suppl 144)47–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fenyö G. Acute abdominal disease in the elderly. Experience from two series in Stockholm. Am J Surg 1982; 143: 751–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. Clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A prospective study of patients with acute abdominal pain. Theor Surg 1992; 7: 81–5
   Google Scholar
• Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. A computer-based diagnostic score to aid in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain. Theor Surg 1992; 7: 86–90
   Google Scholar
• Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. Sex-specific diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994; 29: 59–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Dombal F T. Acute abdominal pain—an OMGE survey. Scand J Gastroenterol 1979; 14(Suppl 56)29–43
   Google Scholar
• de Dombal F T. The OMGE acute abdominal pain survey. Progress report 1986. Scand J Gastroenterol 1988; 23(Suppl 144)35–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikonen J K, Rokkanen P U, Grönroos P, Kataja J M, Nykanen P, de Dombal F T, et al. Presentation and diagnosis of acute abdominal pain in Finland: a computer aided study. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1983; 72: 332–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Dombal F T. Diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 1991
   Google Scholar
• Galen R S, Gambino S R. Beyond normality: the predictive value and efficiency of medical diagnosis. Wiley, New York 1975; 49–51; 115–6
   Google Scholar
• Clarke J R, Hayward C Z. A scientific basis for surgical reasoning. I. Diagnostic accuracy—sensitivity, specificity, prevalence and predictive value. Theor Surg 1990; 5: 129–32
   Google Scholar
• Clarke J R. A scientific basis for surgical reasoning. II. Probability revision—odds ratios, likelihood ratios and Bayes' theorem. Theor Surg 1990; 5: 206–10
   Google Scholar
• Lavelle S M, Kanagaratnam B. The information value of clinical data. Int J Biomed Comput 1990; 26: 203–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Addiss D G, Shaffer N, Fowler B, Tauxe R. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132: 910–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. Diagnostic approaches in acute cholecystitis; a prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain. Theor Surg 1993; 8: 15–20
   Google Scholar
• Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. Contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and computer assistance to diagnosis of acute small-bowel obstruction. A prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994; 29: 715–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Dombal F T, Leaper D J, Horrocks J C, Staniland J R, McCann A P. Computer-aided diagnosis of abdominal pain. Br Med J 1972; 2: 9–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Dombal F T, Leaper D J, Horrocks J C, Staniland J R, McCann A P. Computer-aided diagnosis of abdominal pain: further report with emphasis on performance of clinicians. Br Med J 1974; 1: 376–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Way C W, III, Murphy J R, Dunn E L, Elerding S C. A feasibility study of computer aided diagnosis in appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982; 155: 685–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teicher I, Landa B, Cohen M, Kabnick L S, Wise L. Scoring system to aid in diagnoses of appendicitis. Ann Surg 1983; 198: 753–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams I D, Chan M, Clifford P C, Cooke W M, Dallos V, de Dombal F T, et al. Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study. Br Med J 1986; 293: 800–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnbjörnsson E. Scoring system for computer-aided diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The value of prospective versus retrospective studies. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1985; 74: 159–66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Dombal F T, Barnes S, Dallos V, Kumar P S, Sloan J, Chan M, et al. How should computer-aided decision-support systems present their predictions to practising surgeon?. Theor Surg 1992; 7: 111–6
   Google Scholar
• Myren J, Bouchier I AD, Watkinson G, Softley A, Clamp S, De Dombal F T. The OMGE multinational inflammatory bowel disease survey 1976–1986. A further report on 3175 cases. Scand J Gastroenterol 1988; 23(Suppl 144)11–9
   Google Scholar
• Sutton G C. How accurate is computer-aided diagnosis?. Lancet 1989; 2: 905–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt J. Computer-assisted diagnosis in acute abdominal pain [letter]. Lancet 1989; 2: 1102–3
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter D J, Knill-Jones R P. Statistical and knowledge-based approaches to clinical decision-support systems, with an application in gastroenterology. J R Statist Soc 1984; 147: 35–77
   Google Scholar
• Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. A multiparameter diagnostic score to aid in clinical diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. A prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain. Theor Surg 1993; 8: 90–4
   Google Scholar