Development of occupational exposure limits for the Hanford tank farms

References

• American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). 2004. Documentation of the TLVs and BEIs with Other Worldwide Occupational Exposure Values 2004. CD-ROM. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH Worldwide.
   Google Scholar
• ACGIH. 2005a. ACGIH Operations Manual. Threshold Limit Values For Chemical Substance Committee. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Available at: http://www.acgih.org/TLV/OpsManual.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ACGIH. 2005b. TLVs and BEIs: Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson TJ. 2006. Occupational exposure evaluation of complex vapor mixtures at the Hanford Nuclear Waste Site, Washington. Presentation at the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL. May 13-18, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey WH. 2002. Dealing with uncertainty in formulating occupational and public exposure limits. Health Phys 83:402–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes DG, Dourson M. 1988. Reference dose (RfD): Description and use in health risk assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 8:471–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton GD, Clayton FE. 1982. Patty’s Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology: Volumes 2A, 2B, 2C: Toxicology. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley Sons, New York, 4740.
   Google Scholar
• CLS. 2000. Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations for Selected Airborne Concentrations, Volume 4. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craig DK, Davis JS, Hansen DJ, Petrocchi AJ, Powell TJ, Tuccinardi TE Jr. 2000. Derivation of Temporary emergency exposure limits (TEELs). J Appl Toxicol 20:11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump KS. 1984. A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 4:854–871.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deichman WB, LeBlanc TJ. 1943. Determination of the approximate lethal dose with about six animals. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 25:415–417.
   Google Scholar
• Dorne JL, Renwick AG. 2005. The Refinement of uncertainty/safety factors in risk assessment by the incorporation of data on toxicokinetic variability in humans. Toxicol Sci 86:20–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dourson ML, Hertzberg RC, Hartung R, Blackburn K. 1985. Novel methods for estimation of acceptable daily intake. Toxicol Ind Health 1:23–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dow Chemical Company. 2002. High production volume (HPV) chemical challenge program test plan. Submitted to the US Environmental Protection Agency. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/nitroalc/c14355tp.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Droppo JG. 2004. Characterization of the Near-Field Transport and Dispersion of Vapors Released from the Headspaces of Hanford Site Underground Storage Tanks. PNNL-14767. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2002. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). A Review of the Reference Dose and Reference Conference Process. Final report. EPA/639/P-02/002F.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2000. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Benchmark Dose Technical Guidance Document. EPA/630/R-00/001.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 1994. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Methods for Derivation of Inhalation Reference Concentration and Application of Inhalation Dosimetry. EPA/600/8-90/066F.
   Google Scholar
• Fillipsson AF, Sand S, Nilsson J, Victorin K. 2003. The benchmark dose method—Review of available models, and recommendations for application in health risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol 33:505–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foronda NM, Fowles J, Smith N, Taylor M, Temple W. 2007. A benchmark dose analysis for sodium monofluoroacetate (1080) using dichotomous toxicity data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 47:84–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Accounting Office (GAO). 2001. Chemical Risk Assessment, Selected Federal Agencies’ Procedures, Assumptions and Policies. GAO-01-810. Washington, DC: GAO.
   Google Scholar
• Haber LT, Maier A. 2002. Scientific criteria for the development of occupational exposure limits for metals and other mining-related chemicals. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 36:262–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Council of the Netherlands (HCN). 2000. Committee on Updating of Occupational Exposure Limits: Health-Based Reassessment of Administrative Occupational Exposure Limits. No. 2000/150SH/000. Amsterdam: Health Council of the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt ER. 1996. Tank Waste Remediation System Resolution of Potentially Hazardous Tank Vapor Issues. WHC-SD-TWR-RPT-001, Rev. 0. Richland, WA: Westinghouse Hanford Company.
   Google Scholar
• Honeyman JO, Meacham JE, Cash RJ, Sastry AM, Huckaby JL. 2004. Industrial Hygiene Chemical Vapor Technical Basis. RPP-22491, Rev. 0. Richland, WA: CH2MHILL Hanford Group, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Honeyman JO. 2005. Proposed Changes to the Chemicals of Potential Concern List and Characterization. Internal Memorandum 7F800-05-JOH-006 to SJ Eberlein and TJ Anderson dated July 6. Richland, WA: CH2MHILL Hanford Group, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). 1987. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans. Supplement 7. Lyon, France: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Krasavage WJ, O’Donoghue JL, Divincenzo GD. 1982. Ketones. pp 4709–4800. In: Clayton GD, FE Clayton FE, eds. Patty’s Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 3rd rev. ed., Vol. 2C, Toxicology. John New York: Wiley & Sons, 4722–4764.
   Google Scholar
• Mackerer CR. 2005. Preliminary Evaluation of Potential Inhalation Hazard from Exposure to Hydrocarbon Vapors Emitted by Underground Waste Storage Tanks at the Hanford Site. (Letter report to R. Cash dated February 8.) Pennington, NJ: C&C, Consulting in Toxicology.
   Google Scholar
• MAK. 2000. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft: Sensitizing Substances. In: List of MAK and BAT Values. Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area. Report No. 36. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH, 150–158.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences (NAS). 1994. National Research Council. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences (NAS). 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1984a. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Limits for Selected Airborne Contaminants. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1984b. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Limits for Selected Airborne Contaminants. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1984c. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Limits for Selected Airborne Contaminants. Vol. 3. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1984d. Toxicity Testing: Strategies to Determine Needs and Priorities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1985a. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Limits for Selected Airborne Contaminants, Vol. 4. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1985b. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Limits for Selected Airborne Contaminants. Vol. 5. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1986a. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Limits for Selected Airborne Contaminants. Vol. 6. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1986b. Criteria and Methods for Preparing Emergency Exposure Guidance Level (EEGL), Short-Term Public Emergency Guidance Level (SPEGL), and Continuous Exposure Guidance Level (CEGL) Documents. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1987. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Limits for Selected Airborne Contaminants. Vol. 7. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1988. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Limits for Selected Airborne Contaminants. Vol. 8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1992. Guidelines for Developing Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations for Space Station Contaminants. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1993. Guidelines for Developing Community Emergency Exposure Levels for Hazardous Substances. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1994. Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations for Selected Airborne Contaminants. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1996a. Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations for Selected Airborne Contaminants. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 1996b. Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations for Selected Airborne Contaminants. Vol. 3. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 2000a. Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations for Selected Airborne Contaminants. Vol. 4. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 2000b. Methods for Developing Spacecraft Water Exposure Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 2001a. Standing Operating Procedures for Developing Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Chemicals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 2001b. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 2002. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 2003. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals. Vol. 3. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 2004a, Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals. Vol. 4. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 2004b. Spacecraft Water Exposure Guidelines for Selected Contaminants. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 2006a. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals. Vol. 5. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council of the National Academies. 2006b. Spacecraft Water Exposure Guidelines for Selected Contaminants. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson KW, Ege JF Jr, Ross M. 1943. Sensory response to certain industrial solvent vapors. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 25:282–285.
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH. 1976. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. Christensen HE, Fairchild EJ, eds. Entry: MP03500. Washington, DC: National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, 586.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 1997. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 120.
   Google Scholar
• NTIS. 1995. Documentation for Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health Concentrations (IDLH): NIOSH Chemical Listing and Documentation of Revised IDLH Values (as of 3/1/95). NTIS Publication No. PB-94-195047.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2004. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Joint meeting of the Chemical Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology. Task Force on Harmonization of Classification and Labeling. Proposal for revision of chapter 3.1 on acute toxicity. ENV/JM/HCL(2004)7/REV.
   Google Scholar
• Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). 2006. Standard Operating Procedure for Developing Acceptable Occupational Exposure Limits (AOELs) for Tank Waste Exposures to Non-Carcinogens. TWS06.001. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Parham F, Portier C. 2005. Benchmark dose approach. In: Edler L, Kitsos CP, eds. Recent Advances in Quantitative Methods in Cancer and Human Health Risk Assessment. New York: Wiley and Sons. pp 239–254.
   Google Scholar
• Poet TS, Timchalk C. 2006. Proposed Occupational Exposure Limits for Non-Carcinogenic Hanford Waste Tank Vapor Chemicals. PNNL-15736. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Poet TS, Mast TJ, Huckaby JL. 2006. Screening Values for Non-Carcinogenic Hanford Waste Tank Vapor Chemicals that Lack Established Occupational Exposure Limits. PNNL-15640. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Sand S, Filipsson AF, Victorin K. 2002. Evaluation of the benchmark dose method for dichotomous data: Model dependence and model selection. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 36:184–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaper M. 1993. Development of a data base for sensory irritants and its use in establishing occupational exposure limits. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 54: 488–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL). 1999. Methodology for the Derivation of Occupational Exposure Limits: Key Documentation. Luxembourg: European Union, Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits.
   Google Scholar
• Sklarew DS, Mitroshkov AV. 2006. Review of Mass Spectroscopy Data from Waste Tank Headspace Analysis. PNNL-15673. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Stock LM, Huckaby JL. 2004. A Survey of Vapors in the Headspaces of Single-Shell Waste Tanks. PNNL-13366, Rev. 1. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• TFC-PLN-34. 2005. Industrial Hygiene Exposure Assessment Strategy. Richland, WA: CH2MHILL Hanford Group, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas RS, Allen BC, Nong A, Yang L, Bermudez E, Clewell HJ III, Andersen ME. 2007. A method to integrate benchmark dose estimates with genomic data to assess the functional effects of chemical exposure. Toxicol Sci 98:240–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TWINS. 2005. Tank Waste Information Network System. http://twins.pnl.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Jia Z, Wang W, Gift JS, Moser VC, Pierre-Louis BJ. 2005. Analyses of neurobehavioral screening data: Benchmark dose estimation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 42:190–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar