The non-territoriality of an eruv: ritual bearings in Jewish urban life

References

• Auerbach, S. Z. 1999. Minchat Shlomo, Vol. 2. Jerusalem: Otzarot Shlomo.
   Google Scholar
• Ballvé, T. 2011. Production of territory. Territorial masquerades [online], [cited 19 April 2017]. Available from Internet: http://territorialmasquerades.net/production-of-territory
   Google Scholar
• Bechhofer, Y. G. 1998. The contemporary eruv: eruvin in modern metropolitan areas. Jerusalem: Feldheim.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, E. 2002. The rewir or Jewish district and the eyruv, Studia Judaica 5(1): 85–97.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N.; Elden, S. 2009. Henri Lefebvre on state, space and territory, International Political Sociology 3(4): 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749–5687.2009.00081.x doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2009.00081.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousineau, J. 2005. Rabbinic urbanism in London: rituals and the material culture of the Sabbath, Jewish Social Studies, New Series 11(3): 36–57. https://doi.org/10.2979/JSS.2005.11.3.36
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R. 2005. The dictionary of urbanism. Chicago: Streetwise Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di-Trani, I. 1966. Piskei HaRid, Vol. 2. Jerusalem: Machon HaTalmud HaYisraeli HaShalem.
   Google Scholar
• Eliade, M. 1957. Das heilige und das profane: Vom wesen des religiősen. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
   Google Scholar
• Eruvin. 1959. Talmud Bavli [The Babylonian Talmud]. New York: Gur-Ary.
   Google Scholar
• Eruvin. 1970. Talmud Yerushalmi [The Jerusalem Talmud]. Jerusalem: B. B.
   Google Scholar
• Exodus. 1985. New Jewish Publication Society of America Tanakh [Bible]. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Feigenbaum, A.; Frenzel, F. 2013. Protest camps. London, GBR: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fonrobert, C. 2004. From separatism to urbanism: the Dead Sea scrolls and the origins of the rabbinic ‘eruv, Dead Sea Discoveries 11(1): 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851704323017430
   Google Scholar
• Fonrobert, C. 2005. Political symbolism of the eruv, Jewish Social Studies, New Series 11(3): 9–35. https://doi.org/10.2979/JSS.2005.11.3.9
   Google Scholar
• Fonrobert, C. 2009. The new spatial turn in Jewish Studies, AJS Review 33(1): 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0364009409000075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, I. 1993. The Jewish way: living the holidays. New York: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, R. D. 2007. Active versus passive pluralism: a changing style of civil religion?, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 612: 133–151. doi: 10.1177/0002716207301071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herz, M. 2008. “Eruv” urbanism: towards an alternative “Jewish Architecture” in Germany, in A. Nocke, A. Lipphardt, J. Anna, J. Brauch (Eds.). Jewish topographies: visions of space, traditions of place. London: Routledge, 43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, S. R. 2005. The Hirsch Chumash: Sefer Shemos. Jerusalem: Feldheim.
   Google Scholar
• Hutterer, B. 2016. Parashat ha’ibbur and the episode of the drawing: on eruv maps and their publication [online], [cited 19 July 2016]. Available from Internet: https://safranim.com
   Google Scholar
• Kayyara, S. 1888. Halachot Gedoloth. Berlin: M’kize Nirdamim.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. P. 2012. Torah in triclinia: the rabbinic banquet and the significance of architecture, Jewish Quarterly Review 102(3): 325–370. doi: 10.1353/jqr.2012.0024
   Google Scholar
• Lees, S. H. 2007. Jewish space in suburbia: interpreting the eruv conflict in Tenafly, New Jersey, Contemporary Jewry 27(1): 42–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02965546
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, N. 2004. Protecting Jewish observance in secular courts, Tradition: a Journal of Orthodox Jewish Thought 38(1): 95–111.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, B. E. 2012. Space and place in Jewish studies. Rutgers: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Megillah. 1959. Talmud Bavli [The Babylonian Talmud]. New York: Gur-Ary.
   Google Scholar
• Megillah. 1970. Talmud Yerushalmi [The Jerusalem Talmud]. Jerusalem: B. B.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. C. 2000. The Bishop’s palace: architecture and authority in Medieval Italy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, J. 2015. UCLA law prof says eruvim are unconstitutional [online], [cited 19 April 2017]. Available from Internet: http://www.odwyerpr.com/story/public/3840/2015–01–12/ucla-law-prof-says-eruvim-are-unconstitutional.html
   Google Scholar
• Olin, M. 2014. The materiality of the imperceptible, in S. M. Promey (Ed.). Sensational religion: sensory cultures in material practice. New Haven: Yale University Press, 183–202.
   Google Scholar
• Proverbs. 1985. New Jewish Publication Society of America Tanakh [Bible]. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, M. 2011. Creating place, creating community: the intangible boundaries of the Jewish “Eruv”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29(5): 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1068/d17509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Religion. 1972. The New York Times, 2 April 1972 [online], [cited 16 August 2016]. Available from Internet: http://www.nytimes.com/1972/04/02/archives/space-for-carrying-jews.html
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. 2013. The geography of international terrorism: an introduction to spaces and places of violent non-state groups. By Richard M. Medina and George F. Hepner. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2013. ISBN 978–1-4398–8686–1. Maps. Photographs. Sources cite. Index. Pp. Xiii, 244. $79.95, Journal of Strategic Security 6(4): 106–108. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944–0472.6.4.7
   Google Scholar
• Rotenstein, D. 2010. Mapping MoCo’s Jewish courtyards: the eruvim (updated) [online], [cited 19 July 2016]. Available from Internet: http://blog.historian4hire.net/2010/10/20/mapping-moco-eruvim
   Google Scholar
• Sack, R. D. 1986. Human territoriality: its theory and history. Cambridge (U.K.): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sack, R. D. 2010. Geography as a tool for developing the mind: a theory of place-making. Lewiston (N.Y.): Edwin Mellen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlör, J. 2007. Introduction, in J. Šiaučiūnaitė-Verbickienė, L. Lempertienė (Eds.). Jewish space in Central and Eastern Europe: day-to-day history. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Schnall, E. 2011. A tale of two cities? Shushan Purim in modern-day Yerushalayim [online], [cited 16 June 2016]. The Center for the Jewish Future, Yeshiva University. Available from Internet: http://www.yutorah.org/togo/Purim/articles/Purim_To_Go_-_5771_Rabbi_Schnall.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. 1995. The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slonim, Z. D. 1979. Sha’arei Halachah. Jerusalem: Machon Cheker Halachah.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. 2007. On place and space: the ontology of eruv, in C. Kanzian (Ed.). Cultures: conflict – analysis – dialogue. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 403–416.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, V. 2003. Drawing the line: Hasidic Jews, eruvim, and the public space of Outremont, Quebec, History of Religions 43(1): 18–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/381321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susman, A. L. 2009. Strings attached: an analysis of the eruv under the religion clauses of the first amendment and the religious land use and institutionalized persons act, University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion Gender and Class 9(1): 93–134.
   Google Scholar
• Temple, N. 2011. Renovatio urbis: architecture, urbanism and ceremony in the Rome of Julius II. 1st ed. Routledge, Hoboken.
   Google Scholar
• Temple, N. 2014. Rites of intent: the participatory dimension of the city, in K. Gulliver, H. Toth (Ed.). Cityscapes in history. Farnham: Ashgate, 153–178.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, P.; Warf, B. 2002. Eruvim: Talmudic places in a postmodern world, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 27(1): 30–51. doi: 10.1111/1475-5661.00040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar