Why we need to “grasp” our surroundings: object affordance and prehension in architecture

References

• Alexander, C. 1979. The timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. 2001. The nature of order: the phenomenon of life. Berkeley, California: Center for Environmental Structure.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. 2002. The nature of order: the process of creating life. Berkeley, California: Center for Environmental Structure.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. 2005. The nature of order: a vision of a living world. Berkeley, California: Center for Environmental Structure.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. 2004. The nature of order: the luminous ground. Berkeley, California: Center for Environmental Structure.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C.; Ishikawa, S.; Silverstein, M.; Jacobson, M.; Fiksdahl-King, I.; Angel, S. 1977. A pattern language. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, S. 1995. How buildings learn. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, A.; Palti, I. (Eds.) 2017. Conscious cities: bridging neuroscience, architecture, and technology. Anthology No. 2., in the 2nd conscious conference, 3rd May 2017, London [online], [cited 1 September 2017]. Available from Internet: ccities.org/publications/conscious-cities-bridging-neuroscience-architecture-technology/
   Google Scholar
• Garrido-Vásquez, P.; Schubo, A. 2014. Modulation of visual attention by object affordance, Frontiers in Psychology, 6 February 2014 [online], [cited 1 September 2017]. Available from Internet: journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/ fpsyg.2014.00059/abstract
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1979. The theory of affordances, Chapter 8, in The Ecological Approach To Visual Perception. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jeannerod, M.; Arbib, M. A.; Rizzolatti, G.; Sakata, H. 1995. Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation, Trends in Neurosciences 18: 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166–2236(95)93921-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R.; Heerwagen, J.; Mador, M. (Eds.) 2008. Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, J.; Boy, F.; Husain, M.; Sumner, P. 2012. Automatic motor activation in the executive control of action, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 24 April 2012 [online], [cited 01 September 2017]. Available from Internet: journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00082/abstract
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehaffy, M. W.; Salingaros, N. A. 2015. Design for a living planet: settlement, science, and the human future. Portland: Sustasis Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pallasmaa, J. 1996. The eyes of the skin. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pallasmaa, J. 2009. The thinking hand. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Portugali, J. (Ed.) 1996. The construction of cognitive maps. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–0-585–33485–1
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S.; Pallasmaa, J. (Eds.) 2015. Mind in architecture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. A. 2006. A theory of architecture. Solingen, Germany: Umbau-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. A. 2011. Why monotonous repetition is unsatisfying, Meandering Through Mathematics, 2 September 2011 [online], [cited 01 September 2017]. Available from Internet: meandering-through-mathematics.blogspot.com/2011/09/ why-monotonous-repetition-is.html
   Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. A. 2014. Complexity in architecture and design, Oz Journal 36(May 2014): 180–25. https://doi.org/10.4148/2378–5853.1527
   Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. A. 2015. Biophilia and healing environments. Amherst, Massachusetts: Off the Common Books.
   Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. A. 2017. How neuroscience can generate a healthier architecture, Conscious Cities Journal 3(August 2017) [online], [cited 01 September 2017]. Available from Internet: ccities.org/publications/conscious-cities-journal-no-3/
   Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. A.; Masden, K. G. 2015. Architecture: Biological Form and Artificial Intelligence, updated version of older article with new sections added, A+U, Part 1 in 540(September 2015): 130–135, Part 2 in 541(October 2015): 152–155, Part 3 in 542(November 2015): 209–212, Part 4 in 543(December 2015): 124–129.
   Google Scholar
• Shemesh, A.; Talmon, R.; Karp, O.; Amir, I.; Bar, M.; Grobman, Y. J. 2016. Affective response to architecture – investigating human reaction to spaces with different geometry, Architectural Science Review 60(2): 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2016.1266597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, S. A. 2013. Privileging exploratory hands: prehension, apprehension, comprehension, Chapter 14, in Z. Radman (Ed.). The Hand, an organ of the mind [online], [cited 01 September 2017]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 329–347. Available from Internet: eprints.gla.ac.uk/60040/1/60040.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, A.; Hollander, J. B. 2015. Cognitive architecture. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, K.; Blower, J. 2014. Animating architecture: empathy and architectonic space, Art in Translation 6(4): 399–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2014.11425537
   Google Scholar