138
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Economic value of non-timber forest products utilized by the households adjacent to the South Nandi forest reserve in Kenya

, & ORCID Icon
 

ABSTRACT

Many rural dwellers in tropical regions depend on non-timber forest products (NTFPs) for their livelihood and income requirements. However, the link between the economic benefits of NTFPs and their resource base (including local availability and sustainability) and sources are poorly understood. Understanding the dependence on NTFPs requires an economic valuation to improve on sustainable utilization and planning of NTFP resources in the forest. Further, NTFPs are undervalued and not be included in the national accounts therefore lowers overall contribution of forests to the GDP. The current study, therefore, estimated the value NTFPs from The South Nandi forest reserve, using a combination of methods. Twenty-two NTFPs and associated plant species used were cited in Focused Group Discussion, but it was firewood, grazing and medicinal plants that were mostly utilized. The collection of NTFPs took 54.5% of the households’ productive time suggesting high dependence on them. The economic value of NTFP extraction household−1 yr−1 was US$ 579.51. The annual firewood extraction was 7 285.4 ± 1 586.9 kg household−1 and households spent an average of 2.9 ± 1.2 hours to collect a headload of firewood. The net economic value for grazing cattle in the forest yr−1 household−1 ranged from US$ 11.6 to US$ 205.0. NTFPs contributed between 32.7% and 48.7% to households’ income confirming the importance of NTFPs to their livelihoods. This forest should be managed based on the principles of sustainable forest management for continued provision of these benefits.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the logistical and financial support received from Kenya Forestry Research Institute. The assistance from Kenya Forest Service staff in Kobujoi Forest Station for providing information on South Nandi forest; the enumerators and the households who willingly participated in the household survey, transect walks and focused group discussions. Finally, we thank the anonymous reviewers whose comments improved the quality of the manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.