Diversity in Monographs: Selectors, Acquisitions, Publishers, and Vendors

Abstract

In 2020 the University of Kansas Libraries began a year-long diversity audit of the circulating monograph collection. The study, which utilized the checklist method evaluated the Libraries’ holdings based on a curated list of award winning and nominated titles. In addition to determining if specific titles were part of the collection, the study also sought to learn how these books were acquired. The study found that the library owned 60% of the 6,671 titles checked and of those with a known acquisitions method, 59% came via an approval plan. Titles and publishers not profiled by GOBI were significantly less likely to be in the collection as they were not included in the approval plan or highlighted by a slip notification. The Libraries’ reliance on GOBI and efficient and streamlined selection and acquisition processes has resulted in a less diverse collection.

Keywords:

• Collection assessment
• collection diversity
• acquisitions
• diversity audit
• literary awards
• academic libraries

Declaration of interest statement

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.