607
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Rio Tinto and Indigenous Community Agreement Making in Australia

&
Pages 499-510 | Published online: 08 Jun 2015
 

Abstract

The common law and statutory recognition of Aboriginal land rights and native title in Australia have had a profound impact on the minerals industry. In particular, the High Court's recognition of native title in Mabo v Queensland (No 2)1 has changed the social landscape for mining company/indigenous agreement making in Australia. At the same time Rio Tinto has undertaken a programme of internal cultural change focused on improving community engagement, exemplified in its direct agreement-making with indigenous communities. The Argyle Participation Agreement, signed in September 2004 between Argyle Diamond Mine, local Aboriginal people and the Kimberley Land Council, and registered as an Indigenous Land Use Agreement in March 2005, illustrates this change. The agreement, herein described, is the most progressive, mining company/Aboriginal community agreement negotiated to date in Australia and represents a business-oriented and community-empowered approach that complements statutory consent for mining development.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.